What's new

Improved Security Measures Thwart Attack on Pakistani Airbases

Gryphon

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
2,687
Reaction score
44
August 15, 2014 | By USMAN ANSARI

bilde

Pakistani security personnel arrive to take positions after an attack by militants in Quetta on two military airbases in southwestern Pakistan. (BANARAS KHAN/ / AFP)

ISLAMABAD — An attack in the very early hours of Friday morning on two Pakistani air bases was thwarted largely due to improved security measures that show the military has learned lessons from previous attacks, say analysts.

Militants belonging to the Pakistan Taliban’s (TTP) Ghalib Mehsud faction’s suicide wing, the Fidayeen Islam, launched simultaneous attacks on the airbases of Khalid and Samungli near the provincial capital of Quetta in Balochistan.

Samungli is a Pakistan Air Force (PAF) base that shares a runway with Quetta International Airport, and Khalid is an Army aviation airbase that is 12 kilometers away.

Though the attackers, who are thought to have been of Uzbek origin, and some of the more feared operatives in or associated with the TTP, tried to storm the airbases using automatic weapons, grenades and rocket propelled grenades, they were beaten back.

Twelve were killed after gun battles with the defending police and security forces. Five suspected attackers have been apprehended.

Eleven of the defenders, who were from the Army, Air Force, Frontier Corps and Police, were injured.

Analyst, author and former Air Force pilot, Air Commodore Kaiser Tufail, says defenders learned their lesson from previous attacks.

“The security measures are based on several past experiences. The response was so swift that the intruders were stunned and shot in no time,” he said.

There had been “no damage to any asset whatsoever,” he said.

Analyst Haris Khan of the Pakistan Military Consortium think tank says a dedicated base protection force is being raised.

The Air Force is “in the process of raising a contingent of 7,500 personnel for the elite Special Services Wing [SSW] to protect the air bases, but it will take time to build this force,” he said.

“The SSW was established after the creation of Air Force’s Strategic Command, which is the custodian of nuclear weapons for the PAF. The SSW is responsible for protecting these assets.”

Khan says the new dedicated base protection force was born out of experience from previous attacks.

“After the attack on PNS Mehran and PAF Faisal [in 2011] in Karachi, and PAF Kamra [in 2012] the high command of PAF decided that bases can’t be protected and defended by serving officers and airmen.

“Therefore, the SSW has been expanded from 1,500 troops to 7,500.”

Though the new force will be used to protect static airbases, Khan says it will still be part of the elite SSW and the rest of Pakistan’s special forces community.

“SSW personal go through similar training and doctrine of force implementation as the Pakistan Army’s Special Services Group. SSW personnel receive training at Special Operation School, Cherat for six to eight weeks,” he said.

Khan highlights that on this occasion the defenders did well even in the absence of the dedicated base protection force, as “none of the terrorists entered the bases” and that they were “eliminated outside the base perimeters, including one terrorist who was cutting through the barbed wire.”

However, he says some of the perimeter measures may need to be improved and a more robust barrier erected as the current walls and barbed wire are decades old. ■

Improved Security Measures Thwart Attack on Pakistani Airbases | Defense News | defensenews.com
 
.
August 15, 2014 | By USMAN ANSARI

bilde

Pakistani security personnel arrive to take positions after an attack by militants in Quetta on two military airbases in southwestern Pakistan. (BANARAS KHAN/ / AFP)

ISLAMABAD — An attack in the very early hours of Friday morning on two Pakistani air bases was thwarted largely due to improved security measures that show the military has learned lessons from previous attacks, say analysts.

Militants belonging to the Pakistan Taliban’s (TTP) Ghalib Mehsud faction’s suicide wing, the Fidayeen Islam, launched simultaneous attacks on the airbases of Khalid and Samungli near the provincial capital of Quetta in Balochistan.

Samungli is a Pakistan Air Force (PAF) base that shares a runway with Quetta International Airport, and Khalid is an Army aviation airbase that is 12 kilometers away.

Though the attackers, who are thought to have been of Uzbek origin, and some of the more feared operatives in or associated with the TTP, tried to storm the airbases using automatic weapons, grenades and rocket propelled grenades, they were beaten back.

Twelve were killed after gun battles with the defending police and security forces. Five suspected attackers have been apprehended.

Eleven of the defenders, who were from the Army, Air Force, Frontier Corps and Police, were injured.

Analyst, author and former Air Force pilot, Air Commodore Kaiser Tufail, says defenders learned their lesson from previous attacks.

“The security measures are based on several past experiences. The response was so swift that the intruders were stunned and shot in no time,” he said.

There had been “no damage to any asset whatsoever,” he said.

Analyst Haris Khan of the Pakistan Military Consortium think tank says a dedicated base protection force is being raised.

The Air Force is “in the process of raising a contingent of 7,500 personnel for the elite Special Services Wing [SSW] to protect the air bases, but it will take time to build this force,” he said.

“The SSW was established after the creation of Air Force’s Strategic Command, which is the custodian of nuclear weapons for the PAF. The SSW is responsible for protecting these assets.”

Khan says the new dedicated base protection force was born out of experience from previous attacks.

“After the attack on PNS Mehran and PAF Faisal [in 2011] in Karachi, and PAF Kamra [in 2012] the high command of PAF decided that bases can’t be protected and defended by serving officers and airmen.

“Therefore, the SSW has been expanded from 1,500 troops to 7,500.”

Though the new force will be used to protect static airbases, Khan says it will still be part of the elite SSW and the rest of Pakistan’s special forces community.

“SSW personal go through similar training and doctrine of force implementation as the Pakistan Army’s Special Services Group. SSW personnel receive training at Special Operation School, Cherat for six to eight weeks,” he said.

Khan highlights that on this occasion the defenders did well even in the absence of the dedicated base protection force, as “none of the terrorists entered the bases” and that they were “eliminated outside the base perimeters, including one terrorist who was cutting through the barbed wire.”

However, he says some of the perimeter measures may need to be improved and a more robust barrier erected as the current walls and barbed wire are decades old. ■

Improved Security Measures Thwart Attack on Pakistani Airbases | Defense News | defensenews.com

It sounds like SSG of PAF will protect bases ^^, I thought always SSW is the special airborne infantry of the PAF for special operations in India or behind the enemy lines and not to protect bases and nuclear assets, it would be a waste of resources. To protect the bases they have to raise normal infantry Brigades like the Army have it ! Or what you guys think ?
 
Last edited:
. .
It sounds like SSG of PAF will protect bases ^^, I thought always SSW is the special airborne infantry of the PAF for special operations in India or behind the enemy lines and not to protect bases and nuclear assets, it would be a waste of resources. To protect the bases they have to raise normal infantry Brigades like the Army have it ! Or what you guys think ?
SSW will be deployed as Rapid Response Force ffor counter attack tactics - i doubt SSW will be physically deploying personnel at the gates for security
 
.
August 15, 2014 | By USMAN ANSARI

bilde

Pakistani security personnel arrive to take positions after an attack by militants in Quetta on two military airbases in southwestern Pakistan. (BANARAS KHAN/ / AFP)

ISLAMABAD — An attack in the very early hours of Friday morning on two Pakistani air bases was thwarted largely due to improved security measures that show the military has learned lessons from previous attacks, say analysts.

Militants belonging to the Pakistan Taliban’s (TTP) Ghalib Mehsud faction’s suicide wing, the Fidayeen Islam, launched simultaneous attacks on the airbases of Khalid and Samungli near the provincial capital of Quetta in Balochistan.

Samungli is a Pakistan Air Force (PAF) base that shares a runway with Quetta International Airport, and Khalid is an Army aviation airbase that is 12 kilometers away.

Though the attackers, who are thought to have been of Uzbek origin, and some of the more feared operatives in or associated with the TTP, tried to storm the airbases using automatic weapons, grenades and rocket propelled grenades, they were beaten back.

Twelve were killed after gun battles with the defending police and security forces. Five suspected attackers have been apprehended.

Eleven of the defenders, who were from the Army, Air Force, Frontier Corps and Police, were injured.

Analyst, author and former Air Force pilot, Air Commodore Kaiser Tufail, says defenders learned their lesson from previous attacks.

“The security measures are based on several past experiences. The response was so swift that the intruders were stunned and shot in no time,” he said.

There had been “no damage to any asset whatsoever,” he said.

Analyst Haris Khan of the Pakistan Military Consortium think tank says a dedicated base protection force is being raised.

The Air Force is “in the process of raising a contingent of 7,500 personnel for the elite Special Services Wing [SSW] to protect the air bases, but it will take time to build this force,” he said.

“The SSW was established after the creation of Air Force’s Strategic Command, which is the custodian of nuclear weapons for the PAF. The SSW is responsible for protecting these assets.”

Khan says the new dedicated base protection force was born out of experience from previous attacks.

“After the attack on PNS Mehran and PAF Faisal [in 2011] in Karachi, and PAF Kamra [in 2012] the high command of PAF decided that bases can’t be protected and defended by serving officers and airmen.

“Therefore, the SSW has been expanded from 1,500 troops to 7,500.”

Though the new force will be used to protect static airbases, Khan says it will still be part of the elite SSW and the rest of Pakistan’s special forces community.

“SSW personal go through similar training and doctrine of force implementation as the Pakistan Army’s Special Services Group. SSW personnel receive training at Special Operation School, Cherat for six to eight weeks,” he said.

Khan highlights that on this occasion the defenders did well even in the absence of the dedicated base protection force, as “none of the terrorists entered the bases” and that they were “eliminated outside the base perimeters, including one terrorist who was cutting through the barbed wire.”

However, he says some of the perimeter measures may need to be improved and a more robust barrier erected as the current walls and barbed wire are decades old. ■

Improved Security Measures Thwart Attack on Pakistani Airbases | Defense News | defensenews.com
Man we need to deploy snipers in all major buildings with night vision equipment and set 1KM parameter around important buildings and shoot who ever crosses that line
 
. .
Rented terrorists are on the run, but still these rented terrorists are continuing to get their scripts from foreign enemies of Pakistan. PA will have to launch an operation in Balochistan province against all rented terrorists & put an end to these rented terrorists once & for all.
 
.
Hi,

It is utterly stupid statement to say that we learnt from past experiences----. Why did you have to learn afterwards----when you had all the information to learn beforehand----before the first strike---you already knew the modus operandi----what is going to happen and how it is going to happen.
 
.
Hi,

It is utterly stupid statement to say that we learnt from past experiences----. Why did you have to learn afterwards----when you had all the information to learn beforehand----before the first strike---you already knew the modus operandi----what is going to happen and how it is going to happen.

We have cooperated with US and so have they, as Allies; we should have asked for the formula as to how they protect their foreign Airbases-Military bases like in Japan/S. Korea and Germany and learned from it. Sometimes we have to stop thinking we are too brilliant and really ask for help without prejudice.
 
Last edited:
.
We have cooperated with US and so have they, as Allies; we should have asked for the formula as to how they protect their foreign Airbases-Military bases like in Japan/S. Korea and Germany and learned from it. Sometimes we have to stop thinking we are too brilliant and really ask for help without prejudice.

Hi,

The problems with pak military and paf are that of pure arrogance---. There is a problem with learning ability within the hierarchy---ther is a problem in admitting that there is a problem ---there is a problem in making arrangements to face the problem head on---.
 
.
Hi,

The problems with pak military and paf are that of pure arrogance---. There is a problem with learning ability within the hierarchy---ther is a problem in admitting that there is a problem ---there is a problem in making arrangements to face the problem head on---.

That is a genuine concern the problem in admitting there is a problem former Maj Gen Athar Abbas exposed that...our soldiers are dying like ants ever now and than we hear attack on posts or they think they have harry potter invisible cloak. By the start of WOT Armed Forces should have better security around posts-Bases 13 years they never learned 25% of our soldiers died due to poor security.

Take FC and their dress in this day they should be better equipped and protected shalwar kamiz and chappal can't save them.
 
.
The S.O.P. is already in place and guidelines given on how to protect military assets. Problem is corruption and negligence, which we don't want to admit but is present (if not prevalent) in the military. When the military itself would allow civilian infrastructure close to the military installation what one can do? Remember Faisal base fiasco? Even marriage halls were allowed to be constructed, which were overlooking the base. It is still going on.
 
.
The S.O.P. is already in place and guidelines given on how to protect military assets. Problem is corruption and negligence, which we don't want to admit but is present (if not prevalent) in the military. When the military itself would allow civilian infrastructure close to the military installation what one can do? Remember Faisal base fiasco? Even marriage halls were allowed to be constructed, which were overlooking the base. It is still going on.
Yes you are true. But tell me any new attack this year???
 
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom