Imam-e-Kaaba lauds Pakistan’s role in fighting terror

[Moonlight]

still last imam will be from medina not from non Arab so do not speak against Arab ALLAH has chosen Arab even last day. There heart is batter then all non Arab

What on earth you are even saying??

 

[Manidabest]

I just know one thing. Pakistanis cannot even think in dreams any kind of destabilization in KSA......Reasons are known by everyone....

dont b an emotional fool ... no muslim will ever think of destabilizing Makkah and Madina and if any muslim does then he will surely burn in hell .. but governments come and go ...geopolitical situations keep changing .... Before present day KSA was Ottoman empire ruling the place and before the ottomans were ayoubids i guess , and before them abbasids . before abbasiad were fatimids & prior to fatimids were ummayads. also after Karbala incident hajaj bin Yousaf attacked Makkah and Madina and Qarmatians who were residing and ruling in eastern arabia also attacked these two places ... read the history

 

[RangeMaster]

What the hell are you talking about? God didnt give him this responsibility people did. A person who cant even keep his views balanced doesnt deserve to be at such an important post.

So you mean he is not good enough to lead prayers in Masjid e haram and people following him in prayers are wasting their prayers.What do you think it is just some ordinary job then you should not follow him when you are on Hajj beacause he is not a good enough to lead your prayers.Why the hell you don't start you prayer alone.You mean millions of people following him in prayers are wastiong their prayers.
A person having so much hate for KSA that he can't bear even Imam- e -Kaba who is not ruling KSA doesn't deserve to be at such an important post.

 

[Khanate]

For small country like Pakistan , these alliances are not suitable, cuz end of the day big fish swallow it down.

Pakistan is the 6th most populous country in the world and 36th in terms of area. By no measure are we small. We are a nuclear state so we can carve out a peaceful international role. But I agree with you caution must be exercised.

I am against any type of religious involvement in Pakistan state affairs

Alright, I can respect that.

 

[fitpOsitive]

U do realize the same opinion exists regarding Iran...U guys are so crying ***** that u never loses any opportunity to criticize Arabs even when the topic is different...

But let me tell you....A good number of Muslims may also criticize KSA but they don't hate KSA...

When ever some one uses the word Najdi for Saudis he/she must be from Ahl e Sunnat Wal Jamat a.k.a Green Tootay.

 

[HAIDER]

Pakistan is the 6th most populous country in the world and 36th in terms of area. By no measure are we small. We are a nuclear state so we can carve out a peaceful international role. But I agree with you caution must be exercised.




Alright, I can respect that.

But, here talking about economy size. What Pakistan can export to others. Balance of trade. Flow of foreign exchange etc ..Last time Ishaq Dar found manipulating numbers , a day before announcing budget. .

 

[Hammad Arshad Qureshi]

dont b an emotional fool ... no muslim will ever think of destabilizing Makkah and Madina and if any muslim does then he will surely burn in hell .. but governments come and go ...geopolitical situations keep changing .... Before present day KSA was Ottoman empire ruling the place and before the ottomans were ayoubids i guess , and before them abbasids . before abbasiad were fatimids & prior to fatimids were ummayads. also after Karbala incident hajaj bin Yousaf attacked Makkah and Madina and Qarmatians who were residing and ruling in eastern arabia also attacked these two places ... read the history

If I agree with your argument ,few months back Iranian backed houthi militia fired missile towards Makkah Mukarama. and it was intercepted just few 100 Km from Makkah. Now tell me is there any difference between those who attacked our holy site before and houthi/ iran? So why don't we deal with them with iron fist? I guess this is what Pakistani military establishment did when our super General Raheel Sharif joined 34 nations alliance.

 

[Manidabest]

If I agree with your argument ,few months back Iranian backed houthi militia fired missile towards Makkah Mukarama. and it was intercepted just few 100 Km from Makkah. Now tell me is there any difference between those who attacked our holy site before and houthi/ iran? So why don't we deal with them with iron fist? I guess this is what Pakistani military establishment did when our super General Raheel Sharif joined 34 nations alliance.

i dont support houthis or iranians but they denied the they aimed it at Makkah... soo pls be neutral and dont jump on conclusions

 

[Hammad Arshad Qureshi]

We are fine being non aligned , why we need to be party ? ...make all type of alliance , but no military alliance with anyone, neither Suaids nor Iranian. Stay away from Muslim world much as possible. They all are trouble for progress.

I read the entire thread and you are claiming most of the time that Pakistan should not support KSA because of our national interest. I say our national interest is in supporting KSA not iran because of following reasons:-

1) Iran is a backstabbing nation. did you forget what they did to us when Dr AQ khan tried to transfer technology to iran. They provided all the evidence against Pakistan to save their ***. So its better time we don't trust that nation anymore in any strategic or regional development

2) Iran is promoting sectarian violence in Pakistan. before the Iranian introduction of armed militia in Pakistan in early eighties there was no sectarian tension. it all started when Khomeini tried to make entire population of Pakistan to be shia.

3) History has shown us KSA has always backed us up when our back is against the wall. wheather in form of economic support or political support. can you elaborate how many times iran backed us up?

i dont support houthis or iranians but they denied the they aimed it at Makkah... soo pls be neutral and dont jump on conclusions

Lol I am staying neutral man. and I gave you my neutral analysis. I am currently in KSA. and I know the ground realities. the houthis and Iranian can deny whatever they want but it wont change the reality . And have you forgot what they have done in late seventies during hajj? When they caused violence and brought RDX to blow stuff in holy city of Makkah. if they don't respect the most sacred ritual of Islam then how can you expect to believe them that missile was not aimed at Makkah?

 

[Manidabest]

I read the entire thread and you are claiming most of the time that Pakistan should not support KSA because of our national interest. I say our national interest is in supporting KSA not iran because of following reasons:-

1) Iran is a backstabbing nation. did you forget what they did to us when Dr AQ khan tried to transfer technology to iran. They provided all the evidence against Pakistan to save their ***. So its better time we don't trust that nation anymore in any strategic or regional development

2) Iran is promoting sectarian violence in Pakistan. before the Iranian introduction of armed militia in Pakistan in early eighties there was no sectarian tension. it all started when Khomeini tried to make entire population of Pakistan to be shia.

3) History has shown us KSA has always backed us up when our back is against the wall. wheather in form of economic support or political support. can you elaborate how many times iran backed us up?


Lol I am staying neutral man. and I gave you my neutral analysis. I am currently in KSA. and I know the ground realities. the houthis and Iranian can deny whatever they want but it wont change the reality . And have you forgot what they have done in late seventies during hajj? When they caused violence and brought RDX to blow stuff in holy city of Makkah. if they don't respect the most sacred ritual of Islam then how can you expect to believe them that missile was not aimed at Makkah?

well brother who does what is a long debate if we start opening up then why look for 1970s why not go further down to 1924 when ottoman rule brought down in Makkah Madinah and what happpened afterwards... so pls dont tell me Makkah Madina is in danger nope they r not at all and pls read Quran and read Surah Fil with tafsir and if u still believe that Pakistan army is the defender of those places then we r living in a dream. Allah is the best Protector . SAAH YA AKHI?

 

[Mentee]

still last imam will be from medina not from non Arab so do not speak against Arab ALLAH has chosen Arab even last day. There heart is batter then all non Arab

His Arab highness just showed us point blank , our Ajmi okaat @The Sandman @Doordie @tps77 @2800 @Sinan

 

[Tps43]

My answer to these kid of people is they were worst people thats why allah send his messengers to them this really isn't any thing to be proud of!!!!

His Arab highness just showed us point blank , our Ajmi okaat @The Sandman @Doordie @tps77 @2800 @Sinan

 

[Hammad Arshad Qureshi]

well brother who does what is a long debate if we start opening up then why look for 1970s why not go further down to 1924 when ottoman rule brought down in Makkah Madinah and what happpened afterwards... so pls dont tell me Makkah Madina is in danger nope they r not at all and pls read Quran and read Surah Fil with tafsir and if u still believe that Pakistan army is the defender of those places then we r living in a dream. Allah is the best Protector . SAAH YA AKHI?

So you are going back in history we know where it will end and take us to in the time of Caliph Usman (R.A). So let not go there. I don't know about you but in 1924 neither me nor my father was in this world so we don't know what happened and what could go wrong. But currently we have to see the ground realities. Iran and its backed militia are trying to destabilize not only middle east but beyond. Not to mention the number of times they have back stabbed Pakistan. And you are absolutely right about that the protection of Holy places and Quran and entire humanity is in Allah hand. and we are nothing in front of his grace. No second thoughts on that. But don't you think we shouldn't sit down do nothing to protect our holy places. Take the Example of our Holy Prophet (PBUH) did he sit down and did nothing and thinking the protection is in hands of Allah Almighty? The Answer is no . But prepared himself at most he can for defense and sometimes offensive policy. That's why we have verses in Quran Suruh Anfal telling us to prepare ourselves to the best to face enemies .

 

[imadul]

I agree that Iran is not any better, but the topic is regarding KSA.

I don't understand why Pakistanis are so gullible.... the KSA government realizes their end is near, so suddenly Pakistan is the greatest thing since sliced bread?

please wake up brother! neither Iran nor KSA give hoots about Pakistan. If Pakistan was favored on basis of being a Muslim country today there wouldn't be Muslims being slaughtered in Palestine and Burma.

You earlier comments were unfortunate.

 

[Valar Dohaeris]

Interview only about non-nato ally reimbursement, military accounts issue, nothing to do foreign investment lost by Pakistan due to terrorism etc etc.

The point is to bring your attention on who is to be asked for the financial losses occurred to Pakistan during WoT. Is Mush asking or blaming KSA here ? Is Mushi implying that KSA is also a stake holder in the conflict which should reimburse Pakistan ?