We know exaclty who you are....in one word....a
Hybrid....
Yes, almost all of them had been killed.....few survived by converting.....know the History behind the
'Hindu Kush' mountains
?....if they were cowards and were ready to
'embrace slavery
', why were they mass murdered
?
The fact is, they were brave and sacrificed their life for their religion.....most of them refused to convert and were killed....
Now, the question is, why didn't they fight back
? There are two reasons...
Firstly, the North-Western parts of the subcontinent from where the invasions took place were
Buddhist dominated....and fortunately for the invaders and unfortunately for the Buddhists, their philosophy was of non-violence, spirituality and they were academically oriented.....so the
Persians(one of the first invaders) found it incredibly easy to defeat people(of the Gandhara Empire) who were engrossed in spirituality and academics, studying in universities and not practicing warfare....and thus could manage to get a foothold for the first time in the Indian subcontinent.....
Secondly, the Hindu kings did not unite effectively, they individually repelled many attacks like King
Porus(Purushottama) repelled the Greeks, the first invaders, but they didn't unite effectively to fight off invasions later....
This is what happens when they teach you false History, you get amazed by propaganda......
Your Madrassas are known to distort history to the extent that it no longer makes sense....but you don't realize it 'cause it is taught to you from your childhood.....
If you want to get a glimpse of how you're brainwashed, just go through the link below...
The murder of history in Pakistan
Due to your lack of knowledge, you think the History of India is few centuries old and it's a huge feat for the Muslims to
'subdue
' such a huge Hindu population for that period of time....
But if you get to learn actual history, you'll find that, no invader could subdue the entire population of the subcontinent at any time.....
The Persians, Arabs, Turks etc.
didn't rule us for centuries.....they were defeated many times by Hindu kings and managed to establish few small, short-lived Islamic kingdoms which were recaptured..........as a result they gave up fighting and engaged us in trade to increase their influence and make alliances...
History of India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Mughals managed to
'conquer
' much of India but they had to negotiate with existing Hindu kingdoms...and were defeated by the same Hindus
(Marathas) later......
secondly, you forget or you don't know that, the Hindu/Buddhist empires also ruled for centuries and When these kingdoms/dynasties were at their peaks, no foreign invader could attack, only when they became weak naturally after several centuries and were divided, could the invaders gain foothold....
for ex. even though the Persians gained foothold in the North-West, the
Mauryans kicked them out and established a kingdom which practically covered the entire subcontinent and during their rule of several centuries, NO
'brave
' invader dared to attack India....
It is unfortunate that the Empire weakened(due to King Ashoka's 'philosophical transformation') and got divided into several smaller kingdoms....even they ruled for several centuries.....
Regarding the
British, they not only ruled Hindus but Muslims too.....they defeated your so called
'brave
' Muslim rulers too before taking control of the subcontinent.
I say about their ancestors the same thing I'm saying about your ancestors....that doesn't mean I hate them, I don't hate you either...
......and what has respect got to do with ancestry.....unlike you, we're not running after Arab, Turk, Persian ancestry.....so we don't disrespect someone based on their ancestry....
