What's new

Ilham Aliev's addiction to Israeli made weapons

Cool... So is UAE, Bahrain, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Egypt, Qatar, Indonesia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Turkey, and Jordan,..... They all love Israeli tech and buy it. It's pretty cool.

So what if it's also Azerbaijan???

@Muhammed45. Don't you agree???
As long as the "love" Azerbaijan has for ISraeli weapons doesnt turn into a love for penchant to be aggressive against Iran, then there is no issue. Any Saddam-like intentions that are translated into action on the ground could lead to serious consequences. If you dont want no sh*t, dont start none then!
So Vatican is "Christian World" but Orthodox Russia is not?

Why does Iran have to fight against the Christian world? Is it mandatory? Is it an obligation? They have to be aggressive expansionist lunatics like some others?


So? If Azerbaijan acts bad,other muslims have to support Azerbaijan just because Azeris are muslims?

Azerbaijan may be Shia,but it's closer to Sunni Turkey than Iran. Closer culturally,ethnically maybe and politically.

If Iran sees Azerbaijan comitting atrocities against Armenians and doing things against international law in the area with roads and maps and land-grabbing and provocations against Iran,should they just say "Oh it's ok brother,you are muslim" ???


Now,when it comes to Azeris I understand why they buy Israeli weapons. The Israelis have some good stuff.

But I also understand why other muslim countries are annoyed by this and find Azerbaijan's friendship with Israel as scandalous. Remember,before 2010,that was Turkey's relation with Israel as well.

Now when it comes to Iran during the Iran-Iraq War...they were desperate for spare parts and ammo for their American aircraft,vehicles and systems. Israel saw Iran as the lesser of two evils and provided some stuff. It wasn't friendship between the two.

And it was all done through third channels,brokers and countries
By him saying "fight CHristians and ISrael", i translate to mean GENOCIDE Christians and Israelis. Meanwhile, his country has over 1000 companies in ISrael, supports Israel against Palestinians by starving Palestinians of the type of help they actually need, then they come on forums like PDF to tell us Iranians are in bed with xxx and xxx. blah blah...TALK IS CHEAP. here you go, just 1 that crossed me earlier today:
I would be critical of Azerbaijan and sympathetic towards Iran, if and only if Iran wasnt so close to India.
You think iran needs your measly "sympathy"? lmao...who do you think you are? you're just 1 opinion on a web page, radio button. Play diplomacy or get sorted out militarily, simple. lol.
 
Last edited:
.
İran always provoked Alawi population in Anatolia
We came to İran and gave a lesson to you


still İran create chaos in İraq,Syria,Lebanon,Yemen via shia population
who is the next ? Bahrain or S.Arabia ?

even İran use shia militias from Afghanistan and Pakistan to fight in Syria
TUrkey is supporting and managing ISIS, on behalf of OR/AND in collaboration with NATO, AKA WHITE MAN, so you're just saying all this BS to distract from that harsh fact. Turkey is more SEctarian than Iran, because TUrkey only works with Sunni groups but Iran has worked with Sunni, Shia, Zaydi different groups. Stop being a dirty hypocrite. ALways ranting about irrelevant and incorrect stuff.
 
.
TUrkey is supporting and managing ISIS, on behalf of OR/AND in collaboration with NATO, AKA WHITE MAN, so you're just saying all this BS to distract from that harsh fact. Turkey is more SEctarian than Iran, because TUrkey only works with Sunni groups but Iran has worked with Sunni, Shia, Zaydi different groups. Stop being a dirty hypocrite. ALways ranting about irrelevant and incorrect stuff.

OR You stop being dirty liar hypocrite


-- Turkey is only Country who fought ISIS in Syria
Turkish Army killed over 3.000 ISIS Terrorists and cleaned Azaz,Jarablus,Dabıq,Rai,Al Bab from ISIS Terrorists

-- 14 major terror attacks by ISIS in Turkey between 2015-2017


I am saying again İran use shia population and terror organizations like Hezolah , Hashdi Shabi ,etc to create chaos in İraq,Syria,Lebanon,Yemen

and İran backed terror organizations Hezolah , Hashdi Shabi ,etc killed more muslims than ISIS
shia İran killed more muslims than zionist İsrael


btw shia İran never helped sunni Turkey
but in 2010 , sunni Turkey and Brazil were only countries in the world that supported İran for nuclear program against İsrael-USA


TOPIC IS OVER ....
 
.
İsrael gave weapons to İran
1. That was in history.
2.Turkey is currently begging US for modern weapons today (new F16s in case). SO WHAT? (THis is after TUrkey has done NATO's dirty work of mobilizing ISIS For their regional objectives, and US still told Turkey - NO, get back to work boy!!)


Turks and Arabs fought Christians , Because of ISLAM
IN HISTORY!!!...we are living in and talking about modern times, stop changing the context of the discussion here. YOu are trying to revise us back to history so that you can assert a higher position than other Muslims, which is a shame.
even Turks and Arabs stoped Crusaders
pointless again.
on the other hand , İran always attacked Muslims
Where is your evidence? How can yo make sucha blank generalized statement against another Muslim country? Are you Saddam?
Half of the Ottoman military power always stayed in Anatolia when we fought Europe+Russia ,
because of İran always attacked the Ottoman Empire from behind
ANOTHER BLANK ACCUSATION With no proof. IN the dictionary, under "troll", your picture is there.


here another good example
so-called muslim İran support christian Armenia against muslim Azerbaijan since 1990s
That is a factual lie- Iran officially recognizes Karabkh as Azeri land, thats why Iran did nothing to stop Azerbaijan from getting it in the last war. Why such blanket accusations against Iran with no evidence provided. Turkey on the other hand has a docuemnted history of genociding Kurds and Armenian CHristians...why so heartless? Even the US had to formally recognize the latter--BUT HERE YOU ARE, accusing Iran of doing what you're country has actually done to others...so you thought you could just throw that under the rug and we would forget? LMAO.
this time Russia and İran could not support Armenia because Turkey was ready for joining to the war
Thats a lie- The reason was that itw as lawful Azerbaijani land, so russia and Iran stayed out hte way to let them settle their beef fairly and squarely. They only intervened after it was over.



İran can not blame Azerbaijan to buy weapons from İsrael
Iran never blamed Az for that, Iran blamed them for letting ISraeli agents get close to Iran's border with AZ. cant you comprehend?

1-- so-called muslim İran support christian Armenia against muslim Azerbaijan since 1990s
BOLD bnaket LIE again. Repeating this again wont change it, you already said this above. smfh. are you a machine?
2-- Nobody sell Weapons to Azerbaijan except İsrael
Thats not true- I just went through wikipedia's page on this and it shows Azerbaijani miliary in possession of weapons from at least 10-20 countries....wtf are you talking about again???



btw why muslim İran doesnt sell weapons to muslim Azerbaijan ?
İranians says we have our own weapons UCAVs , MLRS , Ballistic Missiles , Anti-Tank Missiles , MANPADS , Howitzers , and many more
Iran is willing to sell weapons to Azerbaijan, so why hasnt Azerbaijan made any request?
Azerbaijan liberated occupied lands with Turkish and İsraeli Weapons
And?
 
. . .
My bad i mixed up the safavids with Nader Shah. The Hotakis ended Safavids conquering all of persia whereas decades later Nader shah and Durrani defeated the Hotakis tho it later lead into a split between Nader and Durrani due political pogroms during nader shah asssination Durrani broke away immediately but the miraclous defeat was between hotaki and safavids
decades, just look at the defeat of Safavid and then the date of complete annihilation of afghans force at the hand of Nader shah it was not even a decade
 
.
decades, just look at the defeat of Safavid and then the date of complete annihilation of afghans force at the hand of Nader shah it was not even a decade

He himself didn't last 2 decades but the safavids were decimated by tiny tribe this is militarily fact get over it. The odds were like 10000 to 1.. The hotaki empire lasted 3 decades longer than nader
 
Last edited:
.
He himself didn't last 2 decades but the safavids were decimated by tiny tribe this is militarily fact get over it
a country is as strong as its leader , Safavid king at the time was shah Sultan Hussein , he literally didn't send any army to fight afghan force till they reached the gate of Isfahan . in short Afghans conquered (let me stress on the fact that it was conquering not ruling) when Iran didn't fight back less than a decade later Iran fought back and let not tell what happened.
and by the way afghans didn't ended Safavid dynasty , it was Nader himself who ended the dynasty, I taught you at least knew that these two Safavid king ruled Iran after throwing afghans out
in short Safavid dynasty officially ended in 1736 , Afghans utter and complete defeat happened in 1729 when Nader shah 20000 strong army defeated 60000 strong combined force of Afghan and Ottoman
 
.
a country is as strong as its leader , Safavid king at the time was shah Sultan Hussein , he literally didn't send any army to fight afghan force till they reached the gate of Isfahan . in short Afghans conquered (let me stress on the fact that it was conquering not ruling) when Iran didn't fight back less than a decade later Iran fought back and let not tell what happened.
and by the way afghans didn't ended Safavid dynasty , it was Nader himself who ended the dynasty, I taught you at least knew that these two Safavid king ruled Iran after throwing afghans out
in short Safavid dynasty officially ended in 1736 , Afghans utter and complete defeat happened in 1729 when Nader shah 20000 strong army defeated 60000 strong combined force of Afghan and Ottoman

You are wrong hotaki ended safavid there was no fight back.. Safavid as an empire ended there

The siege of Isfahan was a six-month-long siege of Isfahan, the capital of the Safavid dynasty of Iran, by the Hotaki-led Afghan army. It lasted from March to October 1722 and resulted in the city's fall and the beginning of the end of the Safavid dynasty.

Isfahan was besieged by the Afghan forces led by Shah Mahmud Hotaki after their decisive victory over the Safavid army at the battle of Gulnabad, close to Isfahan, on 8 March 1722. After the battle, the Safavid forces fell back in disarray to Isfahan. The Afghans lacked artillery to breach the city walls and blockaded Isfahan in order to bend Shah Sultan Husayn Safavi, and the city's defenders into surrender. Ill-organized Safavid efforts to relieve the siege failed and the shah's disillusioned Georgian vassal, Vakhtang VI of Kartli, refused to come to the Safavid aid. Shah Husayn's son, Tahmasp, and some 600 soldiers fled their way out of the city. The famine soon prevailed and the shah capitulated on 23 October, abdicating in favor of Mahmud, who triumphantly entered the city on 25 October 1722.[1][2][3]

NS used a child puppet for like 2-3 years and than decided against using him but as an empire the Safavids never recovered nor bounced back it was the end of an empire.. It was Safavids-->Hotaki--->Afsharid
 
Last edited:
.
I am saying again you are a liar as like FETO style

even needs more Libyan fighters to protect Tripoli
and you are saying Turkey deployed fighters to Syria
there are around 30.000 Turkish troops and 22.000+ Turkish Army trained SNA soldiers in Syria
no need Fighters from Libya


wtf is jihadis ? Syria is their country

go and cry terrorist USA-France-PKK/YPG or Russia-İran_Hezbolah who killed hundreds of thousands of Syrians
Listen...you must learn to stop calling others "liar" just because you can't understand what they're saying. It's obvious you're either willingly denying the truth or you haven't followed the events of the Syrian War from the beginning. You just can't be so indoctrinated.
You're as ignorant as they come. I suggest that you take a look,on wikipedia for example of the dozens and dozens of armed Salafi and harcore Sunni groups that where the opposition during the war. And then the dozens of groups supported by Turkey.
Do you know how many foreigners went to Syria? Arabs,Chechens,Bosniaks,Albanians,Turks,Uyghurs,Uzbeks,Afghans,Azeris,Pakistanis and muslims from around Europe and other parts of the world. Even southeast Asia. If you can't talk like a normal person and you don't know the basics of what has happened during a certain time period or conflict,then it's better for you to stick to your long lists of future Turkish superweapons.

Hadi,siktir git.
 
.
You are wrong hotaki ended safavid there was no fight back.. Safavid as an empire ended there
for god's sake go and read real history , you are talking with someone who start reading history books when in elementary school and started it by Beyhaqi History and the story of Civilization b y Will Durant.
i clearly mentioned name of two Safavid king who were king after Afghans .
Nadir was a nobody , a warlord in Khorasan who became somebody after joined King Tahmasp II (he was the son of the useless king Shah sultan Hussein you erroneously think as last Safavid king) in his fight against afghans
 
.
1. That was in history.
2.Turkey is currently begging US for modern weapons today (new F16s in case). SO WHAT? (THis is after TUrkey has done NATO's dirty work of mobilizing ISIS For their regional objectives, and US still told Turkey - NO, get back to work boy!!)



IN HISTORY!!!...we are living in and talking about modern times, stop changing the context of the discussion here. YOu are trying to revise us back to history so that you can assert a higher position than other Muslims, which is a shame.

pointless again.

Where is your evidence? How can yo make sucha blank generalized statement against another Muslim country? Are you Saddam?
Half of the Ottoman military power always stayed in Anatolia when we fought Europe+Russia ,

ANOTHER BLANK ACCUSATION With no proof. IN the dictionary, under "troll", your picture is there.



That is a factual lie- Iran officially recognizes Karabkh as Azeri land, thats why Iran did nothing to stop Azerbaijan from getting it in the last war. Why such blanket accusations against Iran with no evidence provided. Turkey on the other hand has a docuemnted history of genociding Kurds and Armenian CHristians...why so heartless? Even the US had to formally recognize the latter--BUT HERE YOU ARE, accusing Iran of doing what you're country has actually done to others...so you thought you could just throw that under the rug and we would forget? LMAO.

Thats a lie- The reason was that itw as lawful Azerbaijani land, so russia and Iran stayed out hte way to let them settle their beef fairly and squarely. They only intervened after it was over.




Iran never blamed Az for that, Iran blamed them for letting ISraeli agents get close to Iran's border with AZ. cant you comprehend?


BOLD bnaket LIE again. Repeating this again wont change it, you already said this above. smfh. are you a machine?

Thats not true- I just went through wikipedia's page on this and it shows Azerbaijani miliary in possession of weapons from at least 10-20 countries....wtf are you talking about again???




Iran is willing to sell weapons to Azerbaijan, so why hasnt Azerbaijan made any request?

And?
Listen,just report him. The guy is impossible. He's either a troll or just too dumb to even debate properly. He's been banned twice and here he is again doing the exact same thing.
 
.
KSA didn't normalize with Usrael..

They have behind closed doors....

I am not pro-israel or for Arab normalization.... I'm just saying what the facts are on the ground... Arabs have given up on the Palestinian cause. If you still like to believe in and put your hopes is Arab opposition to Israel.... All the best to you..
There is no Indonesia in the article, so why you put Indonesia on it ??????

Exact my point... Most Muslim nations are in bed with Israel... So why does the article single out Azerbaijan???... That's my whole point.

It seems to me Hypocritical to only point fingers at Azerbaijan when the problems is more systematic...
 
.
You are wrong hotaki ended safavid there was no fight back.. Safavid as an empire ended there

The siege of Isfahan was a six-month-long siege of Isfahan, the capital of the Safavid dynasty of Iran, by the Hotaki-led Afghan army. It lasted from March to October 1722 and resulted in the city's fall and the beginning of the end of the Safavid dynasty.

Isfahan was besieged by the Afghan forces led by Shah Mahmud Hotaki after their decisive victory over the Safavid army at the battle of Gulnabad, close to Isfahan, on 8 March 1722. After the battle, the Safavid forces fell back in disarray to Isfahan. The Afghans lacked artillery to breach the city walls and blockaded Isfahan in order to bend Shah Sultan Husayn Safavi, and the city's defenders into surrender. Ill-organized Safavid efforts to relieve the siege failed and the shah's disillusioned Georgian vassal, Vakhtang VI of Kartli, refused to come to the Safavid aid. Shah Husayn's son, Tahmasp, and some 600 soldiers fled their way out of the city. The famine soon prevailed and the shah capitulated on 23 October, abdicating in favor of Mahmud, who triumphantly entered the city on 25 October 1722.[1][2][3]

NS used a child puppet for like 2-3 years and than decided against using him but as an empire the Safavids never recovered nor bounced back it was the end of an empire.. It was Safavids-->Hotaki--->Afsharid
Anyway we ruled u for 2500 years
 
.
Back
Top Bottom