Gregor Clegane
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
- Messages
- 1,350
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
Yes, indeed.I think the sentence (from IHS Jane's) was referring to the Babur GLCM as having 700 km.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, indeed.I think the sentence (from IHS Jane's) was referring to the Babur GLCM as having 700 km.
Babur 2 has a range of 750 km and compromising 50 km worth of jet fuel give enough space for Nuclear warhead. Quoting low range was due to not alarming few other countries as a threat and thus provoking sanctions on Pakistan as long range Submarine launched stealthy Nuke is a threat to every country and every where.Babur 1 and 2 have range of 700 km but I guess they mistook Babur 3 has a range of 450 km ...I mean what does Pakistan achieve by stating a reduced range of 450 km..since 450 km is still more than the MTCR limit so they are not planning to export it and cThe range has been reduced due to technical reason though it may still be more than the 450 km stated.
Well they have already imposed sanctions against your organisations. so that' meaningless to hide and 700km does not make any other country insecure..the ranges that will alarm other countries are above 4000 km mark and if they have no problem with India testing K-4 SLCM with 3500 km range, Pakistan can always argue on the same logic... India has a much larger territory and Pakistan needs ranges above 4000 km ... The problem is our leadership is compromised and lacks a pair of testicles since they beg to get into power...otherwise it is not that difficult to voice the legitimate needs and sentiments of the nation.Babur 2 has a range of 750 km and compromising 50 km worth of jet fuel give enough space for Nuclear warhead. Quoting low range was due to not alarming few other countries as a threat and thus provoking sanctions on Pakistan as long range Submarine launched stealthy Nuke is a threat to every country and every where.
4000 is a range needed for land based systems not Sub based systems.Well they have already imposed sanctions against your organisations. so that' meaningless to hide and 700km does make any other country scared ..the rangethat will alarm other countries are above 4000 km mark and if they have no problem with India testing K-4 SLCM with 3500 km range, Pakistan can always argue on the same logic... India has a much larger territory and Pakistan needs ranges above 4000 km ... The problem is our leadership is compromised and lacks a pair of testicles since they beg to get into power...otherwise it is not that difficult to voice the legitimate needs and sentiments of the nation.
Makes perfect sense good point. That is why the range is not being fully disclosed and the very reason India is trying to learn about the missile through media conspiracy.It makes sense to hide actual range of a submarine launched missile so that enemy doesn't know where to look for the attacking submrine.
If Babur-3 exact range is disclosed, India will know exactly how much far into the ocean they have to look for our Agostas.
Well they have already imposed sanctions against your organisations. so that' meaningless to hide and 700km does make any other country scared ..the rangethat will alarm other countries are above 4000 km mark and if they have no problem with India testing K-4 SLCM with 3500 km range, Pakistan can always argue on the same logic... India has a much larger territory and Pakistan needs ranges above 4000 km ... The problem is our leadership is compromised and lacks a pair of testicles since they beg to get into power...otherwise it is not that difficult to voice the legitimate needs and sentiments of the nation.
It makes sense to hide actual range of a submarine launched missile so that enemy doesn't know where to look for the attacking submrine.
If Babur-3 exact range is disclosed, India will know exactly how much far into the ocean they have to look for our Agostas.
Low "RADAR CROSS SECTION" missile, it doesn't mean that it is totally invisible to radar and other sensorsRADAR stealth design
Post a new topic will reply you there. Relevant to RADAR and stealth.Low "RADAR CROSS SECTION" missile, it doesn't mean that it is totally invisible to radar and other sensors
Go child play your toys, their is no technology on earth that can totally hide Jets, helis and all other air vehicles from radars and other sensors but they reduce their "RADAR CROSS SECTION" significantly and i am reporting you for your illogical and baseless post with, without provePost a new topic will reply you there. Relevant to RADAR and stealth.
LOL stupid person.Go child play your toys, their is no technology on earth that can totally hide Jets, helis and all other air vehicles from radars and other sensors but they reduce their "RADAR CROSS SECTION" significantly and i am reporting you for your illogical and baseless post with, without prove
I prove my point that "radar can detect stealth vehicle", now it time to prove your point that " how can stealth vehicle completely invisible from radars" you have nothing to prove but you are just ranting about me not to the subject, again i am reporting you for your baseless rants kidLOL stupid person.
These are stealth. Radar cannot detect them now tell me how you will detect them