Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No they didn't, go onto F-16.net and search for airframe 84606:First of all you have failed to provide any proof of your interaction with Raytheon, thus there is no reason to believe you.
AMRAAM exploded, after it lost all kinetic energy after missing Sukhoi and hit ground
F-16.net which is run by a F-16 pilot and has close ties to USAF has admitted Sukhois successfuly escaped (they were outnumbered by 8 times).
No they didn't, go onto F-16.net and search for airframe 84606:
"During a combat air patrol, the aircraft was piloted by Sqn Ldr Hassan Siddiqui and was directed by PAF controllers to some Indian Su-30MKI fighters. The pilot fired an AIM-120C-5 missile but the Indian Sukhoi apparently escaped."
Clearly they are unsure of the outcome by the usage of the word "apparently", since there is no solid proof of the kill, like there is of Abhinandan's, so they simply went with the assumption he escaped as claimed by the Indian side. They seem to know as much as everyone else. No certainty at all, and not proof of anything you are trying to claim.
Actually if you go back a year ago, the site actually claimed the Su-30MKI was successfully hit. Pretty sure even Alan Warnes was shown radar tracking data by the PAF in person, you can find his interview online.
Kaiser Tufail mentions himself that it was a direct hit in his article.You visiting some air show is no proof that Raytheon said anything about AMRAAM to you. Issue a video or audio of it. Otherwise your claim has no credibility.
Anyways even Kaiser Tufail admitted that Su-30 escaped and theres no proof of Su-30 down.
AMRAAM simply disintegrated after hitting ground just like any other air to air missile.
Same thing also happened to a Turkish AMRAAM after it failed to hit a Su-22 which successfully used AMRAAM dodging tactics
Again no such event occured.
nopes. if it did survive, indians would've had a national rectal orgasm day by cheering that pilot about his flying skills and how he managed to bring the aircraft back...May be, it got hit, but survived and pilots were able to land it safely.
and even then, they couldn't make a dent in the western theater, heck they even lost some territory there.Dude, it took weeks for 250,000 men of indian army, 250,000 muktis all backed by armour, artillery, navy and air to take out 30k-40k pakistani soldiers in 1971 and he thinks he can win a fight against both china and pakistan? LOL!
I think it did briefly and crashed near base when it tried to escape after being hitMay be, it got hit, but survived and pilots were able to land it safely.
Thanks for admitting you have no proof of Raytheon statement on AMRAAM.No, I just go about recording selfie videos of talking to random people at events.
Must be something you do for your TikTok page.
Anyways, good luck trying to convince me or any other Pakistani of your narrative. You'll just be a laughing stock - just like your Military that seems to be getting hammered these days from all sides.
And please don't bring up the old events - which seems to be the only thing you guys have to escape debate.
Here is what I know...
Our economy sucks - yet we have the means to buy new Toys & your Maj. Gubar Arya is questioning where the money is coming from as if we give a f#*k.
You're celebrating that we have the 4th worst Passport - but we still don't give a f#*k.
You've got the money to buy C-17's,Chinooks, Rafales, S-400 etc - just because a economically challenged Nation gives you nitemare.
And you keep talking about F-16.net, Kaiser Tufail, Turkish AMRAAM. Why haven't you made a local call to Raytheon in India?
Whats the matter? Are you afraid that they'll give you the science of how an AMRAAM actually works?
Both sides lost territory on western front but Pakistan lost more as per assessment by US Army Colonel John Gilland even then, they couldn't make a dent in the western theater, heck they even lost some territory there.
Alan Warnes never said any thing about radar track, that was just an assumption by PDF posters.No they didn't, go onto F-16.net and search for airframe 84606:
"During a combat air patrol, the aircraft was piloted by Sqn Ldr Hassan Siddiqui and was directed by PAF controllers to some Indian Su-30MKI fighters. The pilot fired an AIM-120C-5 missile but the Indian Sukhoi apparently escaped."
Clearly they are unsure of the outcome by the usage of the word "apparently", since there is no solid proof of the kill, like there is of Abhinandan's, so they simply went with the assumption he escaped as claimed by the Indian side. They seem to know as much as everyone else. No certainty at all, and not proof of anything you are trying to claim.
Actually if you go back a year ago, the site actually claimed the Su-30MKI was successfully hit. Pretty sure even Alan Warnes was shown radar tracking data by the PAF in person, you can find his interview online.
He clearly says they "Survived" a direct hit and they managed to escape (an impressive feat in itself as they were outnumbered 8 to 1).Kaiser Tufail mentions himself that it was a direct hit in his article.
Since you want to follow Kaiser Tufail, then we should also agree with him that no F-16 was shot down either, right?
Pulwama: Two Years On - Pakistanpolitico
Kaiser Tufail As with any political party in power, the Indian election of 2019 was critical for the Bharatya Janata Party (BJP), for it wanted a stronger showing than before. The issues of rising unemployment, currency demonetization, farmers’ complaints of low remunerative prices, and, not...pakistanpolitico.com
"Meanwhile, the pair of patrolling Su-30s was completely shocked when it was targeted by an F-16 with an AIM-120 missile at long range. Having survived a direct hit, both Su-30s scampered out of the area, leaving the field to the Mirage 2000 pair."