What's new

If there was a war between India and Bangladesh who would win it?

Status
Not open for further replies.
. . . .
wowow. one(ME) vs many(Indians)...

This is the best example how could we win the battle.

And do you actually think that you are winning anything here?? :D

I am willing to be a traitor and join Bangladesh Army if they can give me better fish curry and rassogola than what i find in Kolkata.

And yeah misti dohi will be a bonus.

Ours are better for sure.. :)
 
.
And do you actually think that you are winning anything here?? :D



Ours are better for sure.. :)


No just making concern - Winning and lossing is different thing. EVERY time u have no neeed to wiiinnnnn.

we are not fighting with him... We like jim carry, Charlie Chaplin and major d1... best ever


Thx for ur nice appreciation. After coming India - i will kill my pet.

U guyz can help @Major d1 .. He is fighting alone ...


huur. so what happened?
 
.
On a serious note,Why would we attack a country with such a huge population which already tries to cross over to India and make the situation worse for our economy?

And even if we want to teach Bangladesh a lesson why would our thousands of tanks cross the border?

I think some of the Indian members have been really humble in assuming it will take 24 hours because with the airpower we have i see the whole airforce becoming extinct in a few hours followed by the whole economic zones being bombed by IAF and IN fighters.

It wont take more than 12 hours to:-

1.Destroy the entire AF and Navy.
2.Bomb all the dams and economic zone.
3.Put a naval blockade in the Bay of Bengal.

Its good to be patriotic but blind comparisons and things which are just stupid to feel proud of one country is pathetic.

Things like your culture,food,language,art should be making you proud.But some of you guys from Bangladesh really act retarded with your hatred for India.Not that i give a fock about it but it makes you look like an idiot.
 
. .
On a serious note,Why would we attack a country with such a huge population which already tries to cross over to India and make the situation worse for our economy?

And even if we want to teach Bangladesh a lesson why would our thousands of tanks cross the border?

I think some of the Indian members have been really humble in assuming it will take 24 hours because with the airpower we have i see the whole airforce becoming extinct in a few hours followed by the whole economic zones being bombed by IAF and IN fighters.

It wont take more than 12 hours to:-

1.Destroy the entire AF and Navy.
2.Bomb all the dams and economic zone.
3.Put a naval blockade in the Bay of Bengal.

Its good to be patriotic but blind comparisons and things which are just stupid to feel proud of one country is pathetic.

Things like your culture,food,language,art should be making you proud.But some of you guys from Bangladesh really act retarded with your hatred for India.Not that i give a fock about it but it makes you look like an idiot.

What BD fellows and especially @Major d1 is emphasizing is a strategy where by some means (not yet clearly defined) BD forces especially the ground force survives, the opening part of the campaign (opening missile strikes, air strikes, para dropping, naval blockade, declaration via TV, Radio etc that all installations are under India's control etc) and start the real campaign of flushing out the leftover BD troops who will use Guerrilla warfare tactics . Their hops lies with the fact that such a strategy will prolong the whole BD occupation to the extent that it will frustrate IA and finally they will sign a peace accord and move out instead of annexing BD.

Tell me the model number. Bcz u can't access heavy tank .



1.Destroy the entire AF and Navy.

AFirforce just can destroy Buildings. Winded ppls limitation is minimum. And NAvy Attack is old and wild dream. Ur Navy will be stuck in the Surdorban Area.

2-Bomb all the dams and economic zone.

The answer is given above.

3.Put a naval blockade in the Bay of Bengal.

Good Advantage for us. We can practice our shooting there.


The opening salvo of any war conflict sees the usage of precision strikes to take out High value target. In that scenario what @COLDHEARTED AVIATOR spelt out is something which every country will do. This is a standard procedure of isolating the enemy, crippling its infrastructure and stretch out is supply lines in order to break the enemy's unity, strength of mind and demoralize the troops to surrender quickly and thereby reducing casualties.

The airforce once it cripples the runways and related infra will just use the airspace to escort the fleet which paradrops specialists on the field and other troop command modules to start the second phase of the campaign

Populated zones may be out of the targeted places but dams, rivers, bridges, etc will be targeted by both sides. Especially to isolate and divide the country into zones and use it individually for own benefit of subjugating it and using information warfare.

Naval blockade does not need ships or IN to come near to BD. Rather isolating its sea lines of communication is enough to give a total blockade of area denial and anti access campaigns.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom