meray Munna enough of your rant.
please provide a link to your claimed JOINT INVESTIGATION regarding MUMBAI DRAMA.
just because India said Pakistanis were involved we should believe you?
Jara Jara tum bhi sharam karo. GUJRAT MODI WALKS FREE
BABRI MASJID BAL TCHKREY WALKS FREE
Hell salman khan runs over a man and walks free!!!!! this is your justice system??
and then you talk about your judical system???
please spare us Bharaaat rakshaaaaaak nonsense.
indians are scared of our PERMANU HATYAR THAT WE HAVE PREPARED FOR YOU KETANUS. that is why india did not dare cross the border in 2002 or after 2008 drama.
MERE MULLAH
Now you are talking like the Pakistani Govt. you asking for the link and pakistan govt asking of proof. Why should I give you the link I asked you to think with the open and unbiased mind without any religion involved.
Either you so dumb to understand it or donot want to understand it.
1.Gujrat Massacre investigation does not bring Modi involvement. In April 2014, the Supreme Court expressed satisfaction over the SIT's investigations in nine cases related to the violence, and rejected as "baseless" a plea contesting the SIT report. You seems hurt to see the death of the 790 Muslims though they are not from your country but you don't feel anything for the death of 254 Hindus killed in the riot. You feels hurt how muslims are massacred but you don't feel anything when 54 people were burned in the train. Mullah Mian it was RIOT and in RIOT the people gets killed and victims are mainly the innocient people which happens in Indian state called Gujrat and you are very much concerned in it instead of the turmoil in which your country is entrapped.
2. Babri Masjid I don't why you named Bal Thakey leaving RSS and BJP. Now I tell you the story of Babri Masjid which is not from any Bharatrakshak(I don't visit ). In Ayodhya there was the mosque called babri masjid which even the people of Ayodhya don't know exists prior to the issues arises. It was old, building, and abandoned. Some people believes that it was build on the site after demolishing the hindu temple of Rama which could be true because history speaks lot of instance like this. When the issue arises there was the talk of building the temple again. Some of the Muslims leaders were alarmed and they started to protest. This whole situation gives the political party like BJP an agenda and they started a nation wide campain to gain the sympathy of the Hindus Majority.
In a small time span the BABRI Masjid which no body knows and whom even muslims don't care and were not aware of comes to the Limelight and becomes the most important news and headlines.
When some of the Muslim intellects and the Hindus mahant decided in the meeting that Hindus will provide another land and help in building Babri Masjid elsewhere the Hindu party like BJP and the Muslim parties were alarmed that they are taking away their main Ajenda which these political parties don't wants. The political parties wants to gain from the sympathy of religions for the power game. After the demolition of the babri masjid in which the opposing parties made a claims for the involvememnt of all the major leaders of the BJP and Shiv Sena there is a procedure in our juditial systems and the investigation is done by CBI in which the specific name of the leader which you want to speak like Advani could not be verified thats why they are set free not because of the inability of Law or your baseless claims.
First of all the conflicts and the issue over this particular site is not the first one but there is a long history with the first recorded history in 1853.
Efforts in 1883 to construct a temple on this chabootra were halted by the Deputy Commissioner who prohibited it on 19 January 1885. Raghubir Das, a
mahant, filed a suit before the Faizabad Sub-Judge. Pandit Harikishan was seeking permission to construct a temple on this chabootra measuring 17 ft. x 21 ft., but the suit was dismissed. An appeal was filed before the Faizabad District Judge, Colonel J.E.A. Chambiar who, after an inspection of spot on 17 March 1886, dismissed the appeal. A Second Appeal was filed on 25 May 1886, before the Judicial Commissioner of Awadh, W. Young, who also dismissed the appeal. With this, the first round of legal battles fought by the Hindus came to an end.
The Faizabad District Judge on a complaint filed by Mahant Raghubar Das gave a judgment on 18 March 1886. Though the complaint was dismissed, the judgment brought out two relevant points:
"I found that Masjid built by Emperor Babur stands on the border of the town of Ayodhya. It is most unfortunate that Masjid should have been built on land specially held sacred by the Hindus, but as that event occurred 358 years ago, it is too late now to remedy the grievance. All that can be done is to maintain the parties in status quo. In such a case as the present one any innovation would cause more harm and derangement of order than benefit."
I don't know why are you very concerned about Babri Masjid also because this like the Gujrat is situated in India.
3. Leave aside Salman Khan because I don't watch Movies nor I like Salman Khan.
4. As far as the Nuclear Weapons is concerned your way of childish over claims does not justify a responsible nuclear state mindset and should be strip from the nuclear weapons ASAP. The nuclear weapons are not the toys and about the deterant which which reminds me how despite Pakistan nuclear deterrant started Operation Vijay by Indian Army, Operation Safed Sagar by IAF and Operation Talwar by IN during Kargil conflicts does not help from bieng started. Infact I don't wan't to say this but I tell what I believe that there is no Nuclear weapon possesed by Pakistan but only nuclear weapon provided by the Chinese and in the control of chinese. A country which cannot designed a bycycle chain or a moped cannot manufacture the complicated and technologically critical core and triggring device.
Hope this must have enlightened you my friend
