What's new

If India does a Surgical strike in Pakistan, how would/should Pakistan respond??

Status
Not open for further replies.
India and Surgical, that's an oxymoron. Besides they know they have internal problems and externalizing them will only hurt them more. That 56 inch chest is going to have to shrink a little.
 
. .
Now you are trolling your own thread.

Please quit spreading disinformation about Pak army.

Thank you



I most definitely read it, also Hameed Gul quoted it .


Round one: India Knocked Out – Pakistan gets a “Flawless Victory”.
Posted in India and Pakistan, India loses, Pakistan, Pakistan Military, Pakistan vs India, Politics with tags Can India attack Pakistan?, Did India ever think it could attack Pakistan?, Did India lose its balls? What happened to India now?, How Pakistan won a flawless victory against India's false propaganda?, India loses its balls, What can India do to Pakistan? - Nothing, who won the Mumbai attacks case?, Will Pakistan strike back if India attacks? on December 28, 2008 by pakistanization
With Mullen asking for a guarantee that PAF will not respond to Indian surgical strikes.

General Kiyani is said to have responded with showing Mullen a photograph of an IAF Mirage-2000 locked by Pakistan Air Forces’ F-16 taken on December 13th. ‘Next time, we’ll bring it down’, Mullen was told.

To make sure the message was loud and clear, Pakistan Air Force jets started patrolling the skies in hot mode and a red-alert was issued througout the country.

p02092302.jpg


  • Picture: The defeated Mukherjee.


With India and Pakistan standing eyeball to eyeball, it was India who blinked first, with its media and officials admitting defeat on the diplomatic front.

Times of India writes:

While the de-escalation should soothe the tense nerves of the international community, it was being feared that Islamabad, by raising the bogey of war, may have edged out India’s concerns. By feeding fears of an imminent conflict between two nuclear-armed rivals, it had ensured that the focus would shift towards conflict prevention. Indian security experts noted that Gilani made it a point to mention that “our friends are persuading India against aggression”.

While the government persisted with reminders to Islamabad about unkept promises, independent security experts sid Pakistan may have got away with almost no cost at all. “As of now, Pakistan has managed to divert attention from the Mumbai attacks to an India-Pak conflict,” said K Subrahmanyam.

It was diplomacy by fear, and Pakistan played it effectively. As it allowed passions to run high and let known terrorists join in the show of national belligerence, it was also playing victim. As part of the script, its foreign secretary, it now turns out, even summoned the Indian high commissioner in Islamabad, Satyabrata Pal, on Friday to lecture him on the need for India to bring down tensions.

The US and China had on Friday asked India – in a clear sign of Pakistan’s success – to engage in a dialogue with Pakistan. It’s becoming increasingly evident that India has so far nothing to show for all its diplomatic offensive in the aftermath of the Mumbai attacks.

How could things have gone so wrong, wonders Vir Sanghvi of theHindustan Times:

I am now coming round to the view that they’ve only gone wrong for us. They’ve gone very right for Pakistan. Islamabad has got exactly what it needs, and what it always wanted.

Consider what’s happening today. The operation in the tribal areas has stalled. The Taliban have sworn to back the Pakistan army against India. Troops have been moved to the Indian border. The incoming Obama administration is talking about appointing a special envoy for India and Pakistan.

And forget about acting against those who organised the Bombay attacks. Pakistan isn’t even willing to hand over Dawood Ibrahim or Masood Azhar. Moreover, Washington seems largely content with this state of affairs.

I don’t want to sound like a pessimist or a war-monger — especially since I have always applauded New Delhi’s moderation and restraint — but it is beginning to seem to me that Pakistan has out-manoeuvered both India and America.

M K Bhadrakumar writes at Asia Times Online:

By gently holding out the threat to the US that the Afghan operations would grievously suffer unless Washington restrained Delhi from precipitating any tensions on the India-Pakistan border, Islamabad seems to have neatly pole-vaulted over Rice to appeal straight to the Pentagon, where there is abiding camaraderie towards the Pakistani generals.

With Pakistan’s recalcitrance and Mullen’s veiled threat of reopening the Kashmir file, a sense of frustration is gripping Delhi.Pakistan has ignored India’s tough posturing. The faltering Indian security agencies, which have been in a state of appalling decline in recent years, seem to have failed to put together any hard evidence of a Pakistani involvement in the Mumbai attacks.

All indications are that Pakistan is not impressed by the Indian rhetoric. It seems to think Indian politicians are grandstanding in an election year. But, just in case Delhi may spring a surprise, Pakistani army chief General Ashfaq Kiani has warned that the armed forces would give an equal response “within few minutes” if India carried out any surgical military strikes. “The armed forces are fully prepared to meet any eventuality, and the men are ready to sacrifice for their country,” he reportedly said.

Just as we predicted, an all out war seems to have been averted and Indian media and officials are admitting defeat.

China, Saudi Arabia and Iran have come out strongly in the last couple of days which saw an intense diplomatic effort by all parties to make it clear to India that they not only remain unconvinced of Delhi’s allegations, but also that any attack could have serious consequences for India and the region as a whole.

Pranab Mukherjee was made to do an embarassing u-turn on India’s previous stance previously, admitting that terrorism – a global issue and not a bilateral one – should be fought jointly.

The Indian officials have also been made to back-track from their earlier claims of deploying troops along the border with Pakistan.

Times of India, December 22nd:
Even as India refused to take the military option off the table while asking Pakistan to rein in the terrorists, the Indian Army’s and IAF’s quick reaction teams (QRTs) were deployed along the borders in the Western Sector.

“Runways, hangars, main roads, ammunition stores and other sensitive places have been provided with additional cover. Sophisticated radars are installed at a few air bases and we are keeping watch on each and every cross-border activity,” said an IAF personnel.

Indian forces were on regular firing exercises at locations like Lathi Firing Range in Jaisalmer, Mahsan in Bikaner, Suratgarh and Ganganagar.

India Today, December 27th:
India has informed Pakistan that it has not engaged in any sort of troop build-up along the frontier

In response to the ‘deadline’ set by India and the threats from Sonia Gandhi and Pranab Mukherjee, Pakistan had gone on a diplomatic counter-offensive, briefing world powers and countries in the region on the deteriorating relations with India and the steps taken by it to address Indian concerns. Foreign Secretary Salman Bashir met ambassadors of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council — the US, Britain , China , France and Russia . He also met ambassadors of Italy , Japan , Germany , Saudi Arabia , Iran and Turkey soon after returning from France where he had gone for annual bilateral consultations. However, his most crucial meeting was with Indian High Commissioner Satyabrata Pal at the Foreign Office when he said that India should defuse tension.

Mr Pal was accompanied by his deputy Manpreet Vohra. The Indian side was categorically told that any ‘surgical strikes’ would be considered a declaration of war. India was urged to respond to Pakistan ’s proposal for joint investigation into the Mumbai attacks.

According to sources, the Indian diplomats looked sombre when they came out of the meeting.

As things stand, the possibility of war has been averted for now in which is being seen as a massive diplomatic victory for Pakistan.

This of course does not mean that we should let our guard down. In addition to the diplomatic counter-offensive, it was Pakistan Army’s seriousness that put India on the backfoot.

Once the realization set in that any further attempts to enter Pakistan Airspace will be punished severely by the PAF, the Indians had gone to plan B, with Mullen asking for a guarantee that PAF will not respond to Indian surgical strikes.

General Kiyani is said to have responded with showing Mullen a photograph of an IAF Mirage-2000 locked by Pakistan Air Forces’ F-16 taken on December 13th. ‘Next time, we’ll bring it down’, Mullen was told.

To make sure the message was loud and clear, Pakistan Air Force jets started patrolling the skies in hot mode and a red-alert was issued througout the country.

Failing to get that guarantee, the chance of an Indian strike was reduced significantly. For them it was never about a full war. A few surgical strikes on pre-agreed locations would have been enough to relieve some of the pressure the Indian Government faces domestically. Pakistan Army on the other hand made it clear that any action from India would be taken as a declaration of war, and the response would be swift and decisive.

India faces humiliation now on the diplomatic front having failed to achieve anything from this standoff.

In its attempts to isolate Pakistan by building what it saw as a definitive case, it is India that stands alone on the diplomatic front and is left with begging the Iranians and Chinese to put pressure on Pakistan.

We can now expect an intense and sustained terrorism campaign in Pakistani cities in an attempt to destabilize the country along ethnic / sectarian lines – New Delhi’s time-tested method.

On the diplomatic front India will be lobbying hard to have the ISI (and Pakistan Army) declared as terrorist organisations.

We can also not rule out another false flag attack in the next few weeks.

Pakistan needs to stay united.

Its not over yet.

Courtesy: PKKH.



Admin’s comment: India as usual under-estimated Pakistan, by threatening Pakistani Govt. of dire consequences soon after the Mumbai operation was carried out. Pakistan luckily had a rather castrated set of people running the state of affairs at the presidency. They bowed down to Indian pressure and began pursuing the path to destruction on Indian dictation. Pretty soon however, Indian Airforce made the mistake of provoking the Pakistan Army, that was simply observing the whole drama from the pavillion. When provoked, Pakistan Army came to the rescue and thrust behind these bloody politicians and locked horns with Indian forces, which after witnessing Pakistani muscle couldn’t do much except wet their pants. This led to the final results of this whole drama causing the barking from Indian side to be silenced as their Defence Minister made a conclusive statement that has been discussed in the article above.
 
.
Surgical strikes??? Have heared these words before....emmmm....ammmmmm... :lazy2::lazy2::lazy2: U got the answer :P
 
.
Shoot down/neutralize the strike force over/on Pakistani territory.

The Indian's don't have the stealth and EW capabilities of the US to blind Pakistani surveillance and countermeasures to a degree that results in their strike packages returning completely unscathed.


Because the Indian Coast Guard and Navy are more vigilant, to the extent of blowing up fishing/smuggling trawlers at the slightest suspicion?

Indians are not that foolish to do surgical strikes....there are other more effective methods at India's disposal. India will make the economic consequences of no peace - no war situation for Pakistan too heavy to bear such that Pakistan is in perpetual state of underdevelopment.
 
.
I know man we all will be pissed as f**k, but under gutless administrators like Zardari and Kiyani as COAS at the time of 26/11, USA actually told Pakistan not to respond if a surgical strike from India happens, they assumed we'd absorb it just like we absorb The Drone Strikes ..


So this question, came into my mind .

Your question was already answered at that very time. The same place which gave you the info on the USA's coercion would also give what Pakistan's response was, and it was very vocal too. It will also tell you why the said surgical strikes never happened.

And this is an archived NYT article,

Pakistan’s troop shift: India yet to find fitting response - Livemint
 
Last edited:
.
Guys,

One should never make fun of the enemy's efforts----. What if they strike and they succeed--then are you going to EXECUTE / KILL YOURSELVES OUT OF SHAME.

The cost of any war with Pakistan will be too heavy for India, moreover, India knows that threshold for Pakistan nuke is very low. The best response that India can impart is on economic front....make the no-war, no-talks, and no-peace situation for Pakistan too hard to bear. Prompt Pakistan to become a military state there by deprive Pakistan of its social and economic development.
 
. .
All you guy's stop being foolish and calm down. India is not going to carry out any strikes. It is nothing to do with our military. In a conventional war we would lose within 14 days.

The reason India will not launch any stupid strikes is the nuclear factor. If a guy was standing 10 feet away from you and was carrying 10 stones of explosives on his back would you dare shoot? If you did you might trigger off a explosion that might take him, you and half the street down.

And trust me nobody is going to help us. When crap hits the fan we will be left standing alone. Saudia helping us? Are you joking, they can't even help themselves.

WE do not want a war with India. Neither does India want a war with us. We both don't have the money for war. In 2 weeks both India and Pakistan would be counting and "load shedding" the bullets to the soldiers as funds start running out.

There has got to be some smart accountants here. Can one of you do maths and tell us how long Pakistan would be able pay for war? 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 2 months?

Pakistan and India are fake tigers. We have never had a real war. I hope we never do. We are fortunate both countries don't have the b*alls for real war which all in all is a good thing.
 
Last edited:
.
Have some self respect, stop insulting My country with such fucking stupid thoughts of your pea sized brain and sowing theses poisonous seeds of weakness in our thoughts. Stop assuming things as though india is a giant and Pakistan is a featherless chicken. Looking back at 70 years of indian history you should know they don't have balls to do that, they can only hire/support terrorists to fight for them. In fact it should be Indians who should be worried about what Pakistan is going to do next, where are they are going to hit next.

Post reported for idiocity.


Okay, lets for a moment assume that India somehow grow the balls to do a Surgical strike in Pakistan. I remember US one pressurized Pakistan to absorb and do nothing if India does a surgical strike in AJK.


How do you think Pakistan would/should respond? Will Pakistan bow down to the US/Indo pressure?


What are Pakistan's options??


Please don't turn this into a troll thread and this question is strictly to the Pakistani posters here.
 
.
Maybe we do need real war between Pakistan and India to get rid of the bad blood. What we need to do first is open a charity, save enough money for war and then go for it. When I said Pakistan and India have never had a war I meant it. Can somebody here add all military causalties in all the wars we have had with India and then give me the final number.

Then compare the nearly 70 years of Pak/India hostility with just one day of one battle in World War One. The Battle of Somme. Within one hour of 50,000 British soldiers charging nearly 20,000 were dead. Yes, that is 20,000 dead in one hour. Now how many of you big mouths want to go on the trenches and get shredded with bullets?

First day on the Somme - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
. .
Well i think we must reply hard but we lack high altitude air defence which we needed to buy a decade ago hope our mew chief look into it
 
.
Musharraf describes this best.

What is he going to do? The only thing he has is a big mouth. If only his brains were as big as his b*alls and only if they were as big as his mouth. This is a guy who ordered young Pakistani jawans into battle and then left them to face the entire Indian Army all alone, cut off in the freezing mountains. True to form those boys fought to the death to the last man. Men like Lalak Jan and Karnel Sher Khan.

But this loudmouth what exactly did he do. That Kargil plan was so poorly presented that even a Havildar could have told this "Jarneil" that this plan sucks. I mean the moment those boys occupy the heights what are the Indian's going to do?

1. They would attempt to recapture Kargil heights useing all assets.
2. If they struggled with (1) they would ease the pressure by making a full scale armoured attack on Lahore deja vue 1965.

So as the Indian's launch (1) Musharaf's b*alls curl up and go in hiding leaving our poor boys up on the mountains do die like heros against overwhelming odds. What for may I ask?

If I was the "Jarneil" who planned and executed this attack I would not leave those boys on top alone. If I did and Lalak Jan's mother came to me and said "why did my son die for" I could not look in her eye and give reply. If I had shred of honour I would pull my service holster and blow my brains.

The final ignominy being to refuse to accept they were our soldiers. Shame, shame and more shame.

16 years later the real heroes are forgotten except by their families but this ignoble loudmouth is still fumigating.
 
Last edited:
.
Indians are not that foolish to do surgical strikes....there are other more effective methods at India's disposal. India will make the economic consequences of no peace - no war situation for Pakistan too heavy to bear such that Pakistan is in perpetual state of underdevelopment.
How? The lack of economic ties between India and Pakistan means India has no economic leverage over Pakistan (in the traditional sense), which really only leaves open the option of Indian terrorism.

To 'keep a country the size of Pakistan in perpetual underdevelopment' would require Indian support for terrorism at levels that would be impossible to hide, especially with an Afghan government more interested in Afghan development rather than tearing Pakistan down. Indian support for terrorism at that scale would not go unnoticed globally, it would amount to an Indian declaration of war against Pakistan, and India would find little to no tangible international support when Pakistan would retaliate in the same manner and set India on fire.

India has no feasible long term options for inflicting massive damage on Pakistan without suffering significantly herself, overtly or covertly. An unstable Afghanistan was India's biggest asset to damage Pakistan, and that may not last for very long, and if it does, not at the levels seen between 2007 and 2013. Indian analysts need to wake up to this reality and work with Pakistan towards long term settlement of disputes and peace. Dreams of crushing Pakistan while riding on Modis 56 inch chest are just that, pipe dreams analogous to ancient Hindus mastering intergalactic travel.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom