If India Attacks Pakistan What Pak Army Will Do – Watch Hameed Gul Respones

[cloud_9]

Is he out of containment,again ?

 

[Desert Fox]

From a military standpoint he actually makes a valid point. For an offensive posture india would have to concentrate her forces to achieve breakthrough but doing so would expose indian army troop concentrations to Pakistan's stand off weapons like Nasr and Babur.

 

[Psychic]

Did India ever threatened Pak with Nukes ?
Did we ever say that our ammunition are not show piece
Did we ever said Pak is acting like Israeli hitting hard
Did we ever complain over border retaliation
Did we ever go for begging for arm for stabilize the region.

Do something funny and you will see the reaction !! "Pakistan ko Mirchi lagi hai wo bhi Andra wali"

What Modi and Co have been saying is nothing like you mentioned. And do check when statements against Indian come from Pakistan. After Indians make dumb statments against Pakistan. Now you guys openly say that you use terrorism against Pak and you come up with this post like your leaders deliver phuljharian from their mouths when they speak about us.

 

[Nitin Goyal]

Pakistan army will start drafting instrument of surrender

 

[Windjammer]

I.A successfully did in the past not once ....but what is the point of Invading Pakistan now.

As for troops deployment after Mumbai,there is no point for a full scale invasion and waste Billions $... for just a terrorist attacks.

Rest assured we shall "Kantey se Kanta Nikala"

You keep repeating same in every thread that touches the subject.
Surely there must be another method of salvaging yourself other than repeatedly dragging the 40+ year old conspiracy without having the moral to take the adverse situation faced by the PA.....one being fighting a thousand miles away from home with several size bigger enemy on the border and elusive Mukti terrorists in the back yard.
As for the high lighted banter, even your loud mouth defence minister has promised himself to go into silent mode for six months, a good advise for you to follow .

 

[Desert Fox]

Have you thought what will happen to Pakistan, it will be part of India, we will still have a new start. we can always start but what happens to your end

You can have a new start in a uninhabitable radio active wasteland worse than Chernobyl.

We don't even have to fight india. We can kill indian soldiers without even firing a shot:

Almost 2000 Indian soldiers died in the last standoff

 

[HariPrasad]

They will soon find themselves back in the stone age.
Even india think about attack.

What happened in 1998 when we bombed your supply camps?

 

[Psychic]

I.A successfully did in the past not once ....but what is the point of Invading Pakistan now.

As for troops deployment after Mumbai,there is no point for a full scale invasion and waste Billions $... for just a terrorist attacks.

Rest assured we shall "Kantey se Kanta Nikala"

As I said earlier, IA will not attack Pakistan unless it is unaware of the consequences of doing so.

What happened in 1998 when we bombed your supply camps?

Kairay camps?

 

[AUz]

india doesn't have operational military capacity to invade Pakistan. Full Stop.

We know it, indians know it, entire world knows it.

The only option remains is of a nuclear war. Hindus are most welcome to try that.

Other than troll's embarrassing their shitty state of affairs, if any indian wants to know facts..here it is:

The Pakistan's Army assembles and comes into full war-time state much, much earlier than indian army (as proven in 1980's brasstack fiasco, 2001-02, 2008, etc). Its because of our smaller size and smaller army...and all our cantonments are much near to the border than indian cantonments.

The stated conventional doctrine of Pakistan military states that if assessed that india is assembling its forces to invade Pakistan, Pakistan Army will launch the war on india's assembling (NOT READY) forces--in hope to destroy most of them while they won't be in a position to fight off (as they are still assembling into their war-time mode).

This makes perfect military sense unless;

1- india assembles its forces before/at the same time as Pakistan.
2- Take a chance with a nuclear war.

The first option is impossible for indians to do as it has been demonstrated again and again (not only during actual events as stated above, but even during exercises...where Pakistani Military was able to assemble for hypothetical war in one-third of time what indian forces took in their latest exercises. Read about Azm-e-Nau III and corresponding indian war exercises on mass scale).

So any full-fledged war is out of options for india.

And please, do not bring Brahmos, Su-30MKIs or other weapons into it. Weapons alone are nothing. War needs an entire strategic spectrum. IAF...no matter how might...will never stop Pakistan from unleashing hell on "assembling" indian forces, as stated by Pakistan Army's war doctrine.

 

[HariPrasad]

india doesn't have operational military capacity to invade Pakistan. Full Stop.

We know it, indians know it, entire world knows it.

The only option remains is of a nuclear war. Hindus are most welcome to try that.

Other than troll's embarrassing their shitty state of affairs, if any indian wants to know facts..here it is:

The Pakistan's Army assembles and comes into full war-time state much, much earlier than indian army (as proven in 1980's brasstack fiasco, 2001-02, 2008, etc). Its because of our smaller size and smaller army...and all our cantonments are much near to the border than indian cantonments.

The stated conventional doctrine of Pakistan military states that if assessed that india is assembling its forces to invade Pakistan, Pakistan Army will launch the war on india's assembling (NOT READY) forces--in hope to destroy most of them while they won't be in a position to fight off (as they are still assembling into their war-time mode).

This makes perfect military sense unless;

1- india assembles its forces before/at the same time as Pakistan.
2- Take a chance with a nuclear war.

The first option is impossible for indians to do as it has been demonstrated again and again (not only during actual events as stated above, but even during exercises...where Pakistani Military was able to assemble for hypothetical war in one-third of time what indian forces took in their latest exercises. Read about Azm-e-Nau III and corresponding indian war exercises on mass scale).

So any full-fledged war is out of options for india.

And please, do not bring Brahmos, Su-30MKIs or other weapons into it. Weapons alone are nothing. War needs an entire strategic spectrum. IAF...no matter how might...will never stop Pakistan from unleashing hell on "assembling" indian forces, as stated by Pakistan Army's war doctrine.

After 4 defeat and partition of country, this is a good consolation.

 

[Bornubus]

You keep repeating same in every thread that touches the subject.
Surely there must be another method of salvaging yourself other than repeatedly dragging the 40+ year old conspiracy without having the moral to take the adverse situation faced by the PA.....one being fighting a thousand miles away from home with several size bigger enemy on the border and elusive Mukti terrorists in the back yard.
As for the high lighted banter, even your loud mouth defence minister has promised himself to go into silent mode for six months, a good advise for you to follow .

You must be the same insecure fellow who give your sources as queer magazines and random tweets.... Come out of your 1971 loosing syndrome.

Point out where did I mention 1971 ?

There are several other instances where IA successfully invaded Pakistan not necessarily 1971.

Siachen and Kargil .. Both are part of the republic.

 

[Windjammer]

r

Pakistan army will start drafting instrument of surrender

More Indian dead in dump trucks .

 

[AUz]

After 4 defeat and partition of country, this is a good consolation.

Pakistan is still there. Our continuous land-mass was never "divided". However, we did divide continuous land-mass of india into THREE and still maintain that status-quo.

West Pakistan (today's Pakistan) never lost a war to india. Only loss was East Pakistan...separated from us by thousand miles.

You can keep repeating the lie of giving us any defeats...if that soothes your humiliated reality of your motherland being destroyed, decimated, and ruled over for centuries by superior Islamic civilization. However, the status-quo itself is a piss on india's face. Its historical lands...continuous geography that is....stands divided into three.

For us, we never lost a war OR got our continuous land divided. What we "lost" was a similar loss that even British Empire/French Empire suffered. That is, losing a land you control...thousands of miles away from your mainland...and whose population has rise up in revolt and your enemy is fighting against you with the help of local populace.

Such losses mean nothing in military term. Its more of a political failure.

Even your generals accept that.

 

[HariPrasad]

Our continuous land-mass was never "divided".

This is very interesting. COntineous land mass never divide. Awesome.

 

[Windjammer]

You must be the same insecure fellow who give your sources as queer magazines and random tweets.... Come out of your 1971 loosing syndrome.

Point out where did I mention 1971 ?

There are several other instances where IA successfully invaded Pakistan not necessarily 1971.

Siachen and Kargil .. Both are part of the republic.

Insecure......... Indian who daily spends time on PDF chest thumping has the knack to call others insecure. Lol.
As for my contacts or sources, it's way beyond your ability to either comprehend or comment for those running this forum know well where I'm comming from.
And according to your teachings, India invaded Kargil.... or was it the other way around. !!