What's new

If China, Pakistan and Sri Lanka attack India at the same time, how long will it take them to defeat

Status
Not open for further replies.

$@rJen

BANNED
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
6,326
Reaction score
-21
Country
India
Location
Israel
If China, Pakistan and Sri Lanka attack India at the same time, how long will it take them to defeat India?
Friday, February 19, 2016
By: Debasish Pal - DefenceNews



There is such a lack of (say) faith of Indians in its armed forces, India is not still the India of the 60's but since you ask a question let me try to answer. Lets also assume no nuclear weapons are used (nuclear weapons don't leave much for any win scenarios or any point to this answer).

China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka (seriously SL!) join hands to defeat India. Lets see what can China do? The answer is not much.

China has only two points of entry for its ground force offensive against India (1st) through Ladakh (2nd) through Arunachal Pradesh and no not through Nepal (Nepal won't allow this and it's just not really possible for a massive ground force to get through the mountain ranges of Himalayas especially when there are no motor able roads). So in case of Ladakh they can be easily repealed by a handful of well placed regiments. Such is the nature of the Himalayas. It could be one of the most naturally defended place on Earth and the hardest to mount any meaningful offense, so Ladakh will become a slaughter house very fast as after a few bouts into the mountains it won't matter how many troops come in, they will be slaughtered.

Arunachal Pradesh has just recently started to develop infrastructure. It was not because India lacked the funds to build roads but because it was left to the wild as it is hardly defensible from our side and the perfect place for China to mount an offensive into India. So the basic strategy of India was if we can't exactly defend it let's make it hard for them to come in and this would delay the Chinese advance just enough to allow Indian Army to regroup in Sikkim and Bhutan (Yes, the Indian Army has a considerable presence in Bhutan) which happens to be the best place for the Indians to mount an offensive (towards the north-east) into China and cut off the logistical support lines of the Chinese troops in north-east India. This makes ground forces quite evenly matched.

Air forces of the two countries however are in no way evenly matched. China has the quantitative advantage and India's perceived advantage in quality is debatable (it's always assumed that China which is producing its jets at home are of lesser quality that could easily turn out to be false). India will have to compensate for it by deploying overwhelming no. of SAMs which would atleast ensure denial of air superiority to China. This leaves only one meaningful theater of war left that is between the two Navies and here too China enjoys an advantage in nos. But India enjoys the advantage of being the home team.

Two aircraft carrier battle groups which will be handy in the Bay of Bengal and their proximity to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands where due to its strategic location its fairly easy to fend off a larger Naval force from ever entering the Bay of Bengal. This choke point if used properly can potentially bring China to its knees. Also it helps us that most of nations in that region are not very fond of the Chinese either so they could be persuaded to provide intelligence.

Pakistan has no direct advantage with respect to India but still a sizable no. of Indian forces (Air,Navy and Army) will be engaged with China which makes it a bit harder to beat Pakistan but not really hard enough. Pakistan only holds one point of advantage in the Kashmir region which it will exploit and a sizable no. of its forces will engage the Indian Armed forces there whose objective will be to cut off our supply lines to our troops engaged with China in Ladakh. This will have to be defended until our ground forces can mount an offensive through Rajasthan and penetrate into Pakistan and with a population as volatile as of Pakistan it's quite possible to involve Balochistan rebels and Sindhi rebels into a freedom bid which will really be quite embarrassing for Pakistan.

China will not be able to reinforce Pakistan with troops as again it is not the best place for any significant Army to just pass through. Deployment of one of the Carrier Battle Group in the Arabian Sea will ensure the destruction of Pakistan's Navy and Ports and Air Strips. Air force of India has a stellar record of maintaining air superiority in all the wars involving Pakistan.

Sri Lanka (at risk of seeming cocky) will not consume more time than a day of rigorous bombing runs.


CONCLUSION ::

If all else fails we will arm every able bodied citizen of the country and send them to fight for their homeland(If Russia can defend itself against Hitler's Germany so can we) . I don't know about the rest but I think Indians after 800 years of sustained invasions by the Muslims and 200 years of British rule have lost their appetite to be invaded yet again.

I would rather fight than see my country and myself humiliated. It's my country and my future and I do intend to keep it that way. I'm not being a war monger but I just believe in 'hope for the best but be prepared for the worst' and if our history hasn't taught us this much then I don't know what will.
 
. . .
Rule of the thumb, to neutralize, the smaller enemy first, and play defensive fight with the PLA. The Role of IN would be gain superiority in the Indian Ocean, so that China could not fortified, the countries like Srilanka, Bangladesh, and Pakistan to open another front and stop all supplies including fuel and weapons. And IAF to quickly gain superiority over Srilanka, bangladesh, and Pakistan, and to provide CAS to the IA thrust over the Pakistan, and strengthering Air defence in North East and Northern area. The high plateau of Tibet and the mountaneous Himalayas terrain will not allow China to deploy heavy and large Strike Corp with armour thrust, so playing defensive, with China, and agressive with the rest should be the best strategy. Plus cutting the Chinese commercial shipping in the area near staigt of Malaka and the OCR region will attack indirectly over its economy. In short prolonging war with China, with Acess denial strategy, and agressive in other fronts.
 
.
Why the fucck would you read the article you know how indians article ends up, just read the the title and move on for your own good otherwise you will end up like the rest of indian
Okay.. I think you are too experienced to know what would be the end results of such Indian article ends... What will be the end if you were writing this...?

Why the fucck would you read the article you know how indians article ends up, just read the the title and move on for your own good otherwise you will end up like the rest of indian
Okay.. I think you are too experienced to know what would be the end results of such Indian article ends... What will be the end if you were writing this...?
 
.
Don't see a war coming in couple of Decades :P

Pakistan Is Fighting war currently with terrorists (operation Zarb E Azb and Karachi Opeartion) Plus focusing to get rid of Energy shortages

India is Focusing on Make in India Stuff and to Beat China in economy and power

China on the other hand is also focusing of Different trade routes and to reach top spot on the Global economy :D :D :D

SriLanka??? will they even attack India??
 
. .
its a hypothetical scenario.. and the author is too sensitive
so hypothetically tell you something more , Bharat will use 500+ mega ton hydrogen bomb's on china first and then smaller bombs to the other so called adversaries . bye for now
 
. . . . .
China has only two points of entry for its ground force offensive against India (1st) through Ladakh (2nd) through Arunachal Pradesh and no not through Nepal (Nepal won't allow this and it's just not really possible for a massive ground force to get through the mountain ranges of Himalayas especially when there are no motor able roads). So in case of Ladakh they can be easily repealed by a handful of well placed regiments. Such is the nature of the Himalayas. It could be one of the most naturally defended place on Earth and the hardest to mount any meaningful offense, so Ladakh will become a slaughter house very fast as after a few bouts into the mountains it won't matter how many troops come in, they will be slaughtered .

A Nut Job article at best. So lets discredit it. China has five options and not two - ladakh - garhwal - Sikkim - arunachal - Nagaland/Manipur (through North Myanmar), and all will be used. For gods sakes just see the Indian army orbat in North East. Even dumbest Indian can see that this is Indian army assessment.

For the red part - what will Nepal do? Complain? They have roads leading into Nepal. Indian army has based a Division each at Raipur as also Siliguri for these contingencies as also at Bareilly.

For the blue part - if they send a corps strength - keep slaughtering! They will break through faster than you can slaughter them!!!! LOL


It was not because India lacked the funds to build roads but because it was left to the wild as it is hardly defensible from our side and the perfect place for China to mount an offensive into India. So the basic strategy of India was if we can't exactly defend it let's make it hard for them to come in and this would delay the Chinese advance just enough to allow Indian Army to regroup in Sikkim and Bhutan (Yes, the Indian Army has a considerable presence in Bhutan) which happens to be the best place for the Indians to mount an offensive (towards the north-east) into China and cut off the logistical support lines of the Chinese troops in north-east India. This makes ground forces quite evenly matched.

What a load of crap. The rationale was not as mentioned here but in recognizing that the Chinese can field a massive standing army which will outnumber India immediately (in 50s and 60s) along with 6th Schedule of Constitution of India which was aimed at ensuring the tribes are nurtured (what a cockeyed idea) and allowed to thrive in natural surroundings 9advent of industries, tourism and foreign contact would have spoiled the lil darlings, you see)
And which army is there in Bhutan? IMTRAT - a training team and medical support team .. that's it. And where do you regroup in Sikkim and Bhutan? In Air? Does this guy seriously even know the area? The Chinese will just need to slice through Chumbi Valley (the trijunction of India-Bhutan-China) and cut India in Siliguri corridor .. forget regrouping. Crap.

Naval forces will be irrelevant for Chinese. They will not be relying on naval forces. Neither for India except against SL and Pakistan in this fantasy game. Airforce - IAF is screwed ...!!!


Pakistan has no direct advantage with respect to India but still a sizable no. of Indian forces (Air,Navy and Army) will be engaged with China which makes it a bit harder to beat Pakistan but not really hard enough. Pakistan only holds one point of advantage in the Kashmir region which it will exploit and a sizable no. of its forces will engage the Indian Armed forces there whose objective will be to cut off our supply lines to our troops engaged with China in Ladakh. This will have to be defended until our ground forces can mount an offensive through Rajasthan and penetrate into Pakistan and with a population as volatile as of Pakistan it's quite possible to involve Balochistan rebels and Sindhi rebels into a freedom bid which will really be quite embarrassing for Pakistan.

OMG!!!! Am speechless!!! They have a very competent and professional army. We will be hard pressed on their front .... at best, in a two front war. Forget anything beyond that. Rest is all fantasy

Sri Lanka (at risk of seeming cocky) will not consume more time than a day of rigorous bombing runs.

Yeah they are couple of kids right? They will wreak havoc on Indian defence infrastructure in south with just special forces ... forget anything more .... we are thin in south ... oh wait we have Tamil Nadu to activate ... lol


CONCLUSION ::

If all else fails we will arm every able bodied citizen of the country and send them to fight for their homeland(If Russia can defend itself against Hitler's Germany so can we) . I don't know about the rest but I think Indians after 800 years of sustained invasions by the Muslims and 200 years of British rule have lost their appetite to be invaded yet again.

I would rather fight than see my country and myself humiliated. It's my country and my future and I do intend to keep it that way. I'm not being a war monger but I just believe in 'hope for the best but be prepared for the worst' and if our history hasn't taught us this much then I don't know what will.

Praise be to this gentleman who you quote @sarjenprabhu seriously ..... wasted my time ... cant even laugh now

Is this a joke? :disagree:

YES!!! Please laugh now ....if can!
 
.
I don't have to read even a bit of article but I know the conclusion because I saw the author name.

The conclusion will be China have low quality over india very high quality (tejas and $h1ts).

Pakistan will be defeated using 10 step procedures as they have tiny defence force and every Pakistani is trying to make their house a new independent country (180 million Pakistanis = 180 million countries, indian mindset)

Srilanka can be defeated by Tamil addu police.

These articles from indians are not to be taken as serious as they are the food for the satisfaction of 98% (Katja described) indians.
 
.
It will take India 2 minutes to defeat Sri Lanka, 20 minutes to defeat Pakistan and 2 Hours to defeat China!

And 2 days for me to stop laughing after reading this ... lol ... good one

I don't have to read even a bit of article but I know the conclusion because I saw the author name.

The conclusion will be China have low quality over india very high quality (tejas and $h1ts).

Pakistan will be defeated using 10 step procedures as they have tiny defence force and every Pakistani is trying to make their house a new independent country (180 million Pakistanis = 180 million countries, indian mindset)

Srilanka can be defeated by Tamil addu police.

These articles from indians are not to be taken as serious as they are the food for the satisfaction of 98% (Katja described) indians.


Don't generalize your statements ...... laugh at this joke, its an effing joke of a post ..... don't get into personalized insults ...

thanks
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom