What's new

IDN TAKE: THE PSYCHOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF INS ARIHANT

Ain't this the one whose super duper "secrets got stolen? Why don't you learn to keep things quiet before trying to act like a supa phawa! :lol:
No that was Scorpene class.
And in terms of capabilities, Arihant is daddy scorpenes.:lol:

All subs can be detected but Nuclear subs are more noisy as compared to Diesel subs.
But they will fire SLBMs from thousands of kilometres away where noise doesn't matter.
 
well you claims to have TNW in nasar , you havr any pic/ video of TNW installed in nassar to backup yours claims?

do claim to have nuclear bombs, do you have any pic of your bombs to backup your claims? what if you bought 5 from china ready made n u ended those...

US also do not release its OBL oic/ video etc
Are you really that naive or pretending to be one? Does anyone dispute Pakistan's nuclear capabilities including India? If indeed we only bought 5 bombs (by the way they were six) why does the US and others engage Pakistan on nuclear issues? Why does India not call Pakistan's nuclear bluff and attack with all its conventional might? Isnt Pakistan accused of using nuclear card as a black mail tactic? We must be damn good if we are making the entire world a fool over our fake nuclear weapons.:hitwall:
As for OBL, do learn the difference between the two. We are talking about surgical strikes here. There is plenty of evidence to suggest the raid took place. Where is the Indian evidence? US chopper was downed during OBL raid which is another proof that the raid actually happened unless you think Pakistanis themselves put the wreckage there with the help of the US? I mean come on.
My contention with Indian version of sir gi kal strike is that India claims it struck inside Pakistan and killed more than two dozen terrorists or militants whatever. India also claims that its special forces had real time intelligence gathering and support with spy birds for the 1st time. Now this begs the question that if indeed the spy birds were providing real time intelligence than they also must be recording and broadcasting live of whats going on on the ground? Why than the Indian government is so hesitant to show the entire world what it achieved and to name and shame Pakistan like Indians famously put? Every Indian so proudly displays pictures of Pakistani surrender in 71, am i to assume that Indians are now only content with what their government claims and does not like to belittle Pakistan and Pakistanis when the best opportunity has presented itself? Please!
Your comment on nasir is stupidity as best which is why there is no need for me to reply.
 
India dont have capablities to launch nuclear missiles or bombs from air
 
India dont have capablities to launch nuclear missiles or bombs from air
sorry to burst your bubble but it does and since 1990s when it got M2K and Mig29 both of which can carry neuklear missile/ bomb to enemy territory and now even jaguar D-2 and D3 can do it so can MKI and with latest tech evolve in SOMs we got from france and israel even smaller planes like :CA can drop low yield (upto1-5kton) neuclear bombs from air

while Prahar , Prithvi ,Agni series and Bhrmos can diliver neuclear tipped warheads from ground and even Pinaka -2 MRBL can do the same till 60+Km
 
sorry to burst your bubble but it does and since 1990s when it got M2K and Mig29 both of which can carry neuklear missile/ bomb to enemy territory and now even jaguar D-2 and D3 can do it so can MKI and with latest tech evolve in SOMs we got from france and israel even smaller planes like :CA can drop low yield (upto1-5kton) neuclear bombs from air

while Prahar , Prithvi ,Agni series and Bhrmos can diliver neuclear tipped warheads from ground and even Pinaka -2 MRBL can do the same till 60+Km
Prithvi agni pinaka all of them land based weapons and fighter jets cant carry or fire billistic missile you need to update your knowledge and yet india is unable to tip brahmos with nuclear warhead
 
Prithvi agni pinaka all of them land based weapons and fighter jets cant carry or fire billistic missile you need to update your knowledge and yet india is unable to tip brahmos with nuclear warhead
no fighter jets carry very compact and lightwieght low yield nuecs often housed in SOM bodies of stealth missiles like storm shadow of delihilah/popey even bhrmos ACML or nirbhay ACML is the same thing even a LGB can be modified for the same job also buy using a LGB kit on a low yield compact(arty shell shaped neuclear weapon)
india unlike some countries is into researche of neuclear technologies since early 1950s and conducted our first test as early as 1974 so we have been designing our warheads for almost all major offensive weapons we have inclueding Pinaka , Prithvi , Prahar and Bhramos or now the new gen series of sub launched small , medium and long range billistic missiles which all have neuclear warheads on them

but as usual i can change your pre concieved notions please do keep beleveing what you want does not change the ground realities
 
no fighter jets carry very compact and lightwieght low yield nuecs often housed in SOM bodies of stealth missiles like storm shadow of delihilah/popey even bhrmos ACML or nirbhay ACML is the same thing even a LGB can be modified for the same job also buy using a LGB kit on a low yield compact(arty shell shaped neuclear weapon)
india unlike some countries is into researche of neuclear technologies since early 1950s and conducted our first test as early as 1974 so we have been designing our warheads for almost all major offensive weapons we have inclueding Pinaka , Prithvi , Prahar and Bhramos or now the new gen series of sub launched small , medium and long range billistic missiles which all have neuclear warheads on them

but as usual i can change your pre concieved notions please do keep beleveing what you want does not change the ground realities
Well ground realties are that india dont have air launched capabilties they do have have platforms but no munitiin like pakistan do poses air launched nuke but have no platform to deliver them so both countries atm only rely on ground based dettrence mean while india will have sea based becus of there nuke subs
 
@ISI. @Robinhood Pandey @Skull and Bones
REFRAIN from posting flaming posts about religion and stop directing insults at others religions. ALL OF YOU.

Next time i wont stop at merely reporting and deleting the posts.

All others, when you see such posts, rather then quoting them and replying them, even with a sensible post like you did @ pakistanipower JUST REPORT THEM please. When you quote a troll post you make the job of MODs as the filth of the original troll post remain in you post and thus that too have to be handled. I hope you will understand.
what is religion thing in @I S I post..
it was their DM who had claimed their army is Hanuman..
@I S I is right to question, so that in future if something happens in coastal area of Pakistan we should not ask for Proof.
 
well you claims to have TNW in nasar , you havr any pic/ video of TNW installed in nassar to backup yours claims?

do claim to have nuclear bombs, do you have any pic of your bombs to backup your claims? what if you bought 5 from china ready made n u ended those...

US also do not release its OBL oic/ video etc
their was an army helicopter bombed up there and an attack site and bla bla bla...nothing about the hanuman raid
 
Well ground realties are that india dont have air launched capabilties they do have have platforms but no munitiin like pakistan do poses air launched nuke but have no platform to deliver them so both countries atm only rely on ground based dettrence mean while india will have sea based becus of there nuke subs
What sort of hidden "ground realities"?:crazy:
It's only Pakistan who doesn't have nuclear triad, not India and we have tested those platforms for conventional means too. @GURU DUTT stop arguing, it's with wrong person.
 
what is religion thing in @I S I post..
it was their DM who had claimed their army is Hanuman..
@I S I is right to question, so that in future if something happens in coastal area of Pakistan we should not ask for Proof.

You and I both know better than that. Plus it is not that i have some personal fight with @I S I so if he had any problem he will let me know himself. No bad blood between us.

The message have been convened to the concerned and i hope going forward we wont have such problems.

Regards!
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom