What's new

ICJ rejects India’s plea for acquittal, repatriation of Kulbhushan - Updates, News & Discussion

So we can give death penalty after we provide him with consular? Cool :coffee:
===================================================================
Furthermore:

Article 36 addresses communications between consular officers and nationals of the sending state. The Convention provides that "consular officers shall be free to communicate with nationals of the sending State and to have access to them."

So we only failed to prove that Article 36 is not valid for espionage....not an entire loss we will review with consular and then award death penalty to indian officer involved in terrorism in Pakistan! :agree:

Also check this:

"It is not the conviction and sentence or Mr Jhadav which are to be regarded as a violation of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention"

D_rnR_gWkAAaym9 (1).jpg


ICJ has clearly stated that Jhadav's death sentence cant be contested or annulled. In other words ICJ is ok with us hanging the monkey.
 
. . .
They might have few reservations on military court process

But still his death sentence by military court not annulled

Pakistan not stopped from retrial even in a military court
The day you start his retrial in military court quote me.
Till then I believe their are still few people in pakistan who can comprehend a verdict.
 
.
You wanted acquittal.. NOT granted..
You wanted repatriation.. NOT granted..
You wanted military courts decision to be annulled NOT entertained..

Please tell me, will you send the lawyers to represent Jadhav in Pakistani military court, or we will have to bear the costs of his lawyers again? :-)
Given consular access, we'll appoint a lawyer for our guy. Lets see if all bravado you are showing if the handsome PM can even show a half of it.
 
.
That is why I always suggested that we should start reading & update ourselves first and later jump to conclusive questions. For a starter, he was not even a Kulbhashan Jadhav at first per indian say but later turned out to be the same person in Voter List etc. Furthermore, India finally not denying the fact before ICJ rather wanted to manipulate the case so that India's name can be dimmed from support to terrorism list. As the final hour is arriving, ICJ will announce verdict and we will find out as where it went throughout the whole proceeding.

The real question is "Can ICJ enforce her ruling over Pakistan under such circumstances/case and establish the jurisdiction?"
That doesnt prove in any freaking way that he did terrorist activity, it shouldnt be so hard to provide evidence for it. You guys didnt give any in ICJ. Or else u would have won it. Dont spin it anymore.Thats why u needed to use military court. It doesnt matter, lets have a civil court see his case and lets see all the "evidence" u have.
 
.
We will once again go to icj saying that his human rights are voilated and once again court will ask you to provide him fair trail .. also so that you do not treat him unfairly our counsel and will keep a check on him regularly

Your request has been set aside in ICJ...All you can do is to check on him occasionally whether he is alive or not...! Rest we know our obligations as per Vienna convention. Summed up isn't it.
 
. .
Now we will hang him at the time & place of our choice u modi & co scumbags cant stop us :lol:
 
.
ICJ rejects India’s plea for Jadhav's return, grants consular access
Dawn.com | AFP
July 17, 2019




5d2eb9056c708.png



Jadhav — a serving commander of the Indian Navy associated with Indian spy agency Research and Analysis Wing — was arrested on March 3, 2016, from Balochistan on allegations of espionage and terrorism. — DawnNewsTV/File


5d2f1e5f49546.jpg



Pakistan has been directed to suspend the execution of the death penalty awarded to Jadhav till it fulfills the new conditions. Photo: UN Web TV







The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Wednesday announced its verdict on India’s petition challenging the death sentence given to Indian spy Kulbhushan Jadhav, ruling that Jadhav be allowed consular access and asking Pakistan to ensure “effective review and reconsideration of his conviction and sentences”.

The court found that nothing in Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) precludes its applicability to persons accused of espionage.

The provision basically states that when a national of a foreign country is arrested, they must be informed of the right to have their country’s consulate notified and should also have the right to regular consultation with their consulate’s officials during their detention and trial.

Pakistan had argued, unsuccessfully, that Article 36 of the VCCR does not apply to people involved in espionage.

Pakistan has been directed to suspend the execution of the death penalty awarded to Jadhav till it fulfills the new conditions (ensuring consular access and 'effectively' reviewing the case).

5d2f1eae95a3a.jpg


Pakistan's legal team listens to the judgement.


The ICJ, however, also rejected most of the other remedies sought by India, which included the annulment of the military court decision convicting Jadhav, his release and his return to India. It cited limitations of its jurisdiction in turning down those appeals.

Pakistan's team, headed by Attorney General Anwar Mansoor Khan, had reached The Hague to hear the verdict. The team also included Foreign Office Spokesperson Dr Muhammad Faisal.

5d2ee437b9933.png

A timeline of the case. — Design: Leea Contractor


Jadhav — a serving commander of the Indian Navy associated with Indian spy agency Research and Analysis Wing — was arrested on March 3, 2016, from Balochistan on allegations of espionage and terrorism.

In his subsequent trial at a military court, Jadhav had confessed to his involvement in terrorist plots.

The spy was subsequently sentenced to death in 2017. However, India insisted that Jadhav was not a spy and said he was kidnapped from Iran.

On April 10, 2017, Army Chief Gen Qamar Bajwa had endorsed the death penalty for Jadhav. In June 2017, the Indian spy had filed a mercy petition against the death penalty, in which he again confessed to his involvement in terrorist activities.

However, before Pakistani authorities could make a final decision, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), after being approached by India, had ordered a stay in his execution through an interim order.


ICJ hearing

During the hearing of the case in the international court, India denied Jadhav was a spy and had asked the ICJ to order his release because he was denied consular access and not allowed to choose his own defence lawyer.

Attorney General of Pakistan Anwar Mansoor Khan had in turn argued that Jadhav was an Indian spy sent to Balochistan to destabilise the country and therefore not entitled to consular access. He had said that "India's claim for relief [...] must be dismissed."

Khan had told the court that Jadhav ran a network "to carry out despicable terrorism and suicide bombing, targeted killing, kidnapping for ransom and targeted operations to create unrest and instability in the country".

"His unlawful activities were directed at creating anarchy in Pakistan and particularly targeted the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor," Khan had told the 15-judge bench.

India's lawyers told the court in February that it was a “farcical case” based on “malicious propaganda”, while Pakistan's lawyers hit back by accusing Jadhav of “terrorism”.

The last hearing coincided with a sharp spike in tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbours after a suicide bombing in occupied Kashmir's Pulwama, although relations have since improved.


Family meeting

India also accused Pakistan of harassing Jadhav's family in 2017 during a meeting that it said was held in an “atmosphere of coercion”.

It said Jadhav's conversation with his mother and wife was “tutored and designed to perpetuate the false narrative of his alleged activities in Pakistan”.

Jadhav, on the other hand, said he "saw fear" in the eyes of his mother and wife when he met them in Islamabad on December 25, 2017, adding that an Indian diplomat accompanying them was "yelling at them".
 
. .
"It is not the conviction and sentence or Mr Jhadav which are to be regarded as a violation of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention"
I just posted the article 36 for those who have no clue abt what it ACTUALLY refers to....

Only thing we lost is to prove article 36 shouldnt apply to a terrorist....rest is all in our favour :D
 
. .
Given consular access, we'll appoint a lawyer for our guy. Lets see if all bravado you are showing if the handsome PM can even show a half of it.
So that lawyer will attend PAKISTANI MILITARY COURT? that will be a big moment in Pakistani history.. :-)
 
.
Your request has been set aside in ICJ...All you can do is to check on him occasionally whether he is alive or not...! Rest we know our obligations as per Vienna convention. Summed up isn't it.
He is alive as of now ... Secondly once we have consular access we can have his statement ... Very important for us to further our cause ....
 
.
Back
Top Bottom