ejaz007
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2007
- Messages
- 6,533
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
my simple point is that your nation says he is a so called spy we say no he is not a spy as for the 2 passports you say you found with him one of which you allege that he being a muslim is also made by india and that india agrees india gave is a halliarious attempt at best no one in the world belives it accept gullible pakistani media and pakistani awam due to there Hub Bul Watani and i dont hold anything against them on thatRegrettable that India is relying upon technicalities and blatant lies and not upon merit. The argument that 2008 agreement being unregistered has no binding is an immature rather a bizarre technical argument which also contradicts long standing position of India on bilateral agreements/treaties. It's more like implying India being a signatory state to a treaty can't be and shouldn't be trusted, now that's serious for a country like India.
2008 treaty is operational for a decade now, not a single breech by Pakistan has been suggested by India so far. In fact, this treaty saved many innocent lives especially of those poor fishermen on both sides.
Here;
Indian Declaration ( For Article 36-2 btw, article which has been invoked by India), excepts.
(2) disputes with the government of any State which is or has been a Member of the Commonwealth of Nations.
India is contradicting its own reservation by making a common wealth nation a party in the instant application.
(7) disputes concerning the interpretation or application of a multilateral treaty unless all the parties to the treaty are also parties to the case before the Court or Government of India specially agree to jurisdiction;
VC is a multilateral treaty, isn't it? Where are all the states which are party to Vienna Convention? A country's discretion is not applied to other countries (parties/party) for they have their own discretion, in other words all the parties concerned should be in agreement. Please make a note of that.
Pakistan's declaration
e) all matters related to the national security of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan;
Excludes jurisdiction of the ICJ in the instant application.
Moreover, Vienna Convention's provisions have been superceded by 2008 special agreement between Pakistan and India on consular access which has been operational since it's inception. For the sake of argument even if this agreement is invalid, the provisions of convention don't apply to spys. International customary laws govern such matters which expressively deny consular access to spys.
ICJ is just like Third world country Courts ... they favor the powerful only and do not give justice..
Otherwise tony blair and Bush should be hanged for all the killings of muslim around the world ??
i mean, where is this ICJ , when india killing all muslims in Kashmir ??? This is not justice, this is selected justice ...
Whatever decision is, he will be hanged
If verdict goes in Pakistan's favour, Indians wont start bitching about ICJ but if it goes in India's favour, lot of butthurt is to be expected.
LOL .. the same ICJ which indian questions so many time before ????Pakistan is really embarrassing itself at this final hour by questioning the very integrity of ICJ.
as they say when a "extra wise guy " is making a mistake never stop in doing itPakistan is really embarrassing itself at this final hour by questioning the very integrity of ICJ.
Forget every thing the Hub Bul Watan pakistani lawyer at ICJ tooka measly amount of 500000 british pounds as his fees
View attachment 397634
while former indian soliciter general and indian lawer at ICJ Harish Salve took a preposterous amount or Rs :1/- from indian tax payers
View attachment 397633
bhalla ye bhee koi baat hui
@WebMaster @Spring Onion @Emmie @Horus @Oscar