What's new

'ICC has no problem with Pakistan cricket team offering namaz on ground but MS Dhoni...'

.
This is insane. It's not funny anymore, when are theses people going back to Mars?
 
. .
The guy is just a rabble rouser seeking attention. He reminds me of a Pak version of Arundhati Roy.

From a legal perspective - all religious and political displays are not allowed. That includes Sikh turbans and kadas, Hindu religious threads and Muslim beards and any other displays of religion, Christians wearing crosses etc.

ICC in its infinite stupidity has opened a Pandora's box and now will have to implement the letter of the law, else will be accused of selective implementation.
And which law does that all fall under? Last time I studied western law in contained the following "freedom of religion and expression"
 
. . .
Well,

Whats good for the goose is good for the gander..

ICC should have clamped down on a lot things that are against their own laws but in their fear of certain sections, they let it pass.
And now they want to clamp down on MS Dhoni.
They should have let this pass, now this is going to blow hard for ICC - like all liberals, they will be exposed of not following the rules they have made when it comes to certain sections.
 
.
Tarek, we know you have gain popularity in India by "chuking" Indian's "taaaaaaa..." but really really!!!
 
.
Well,

Whats good for the goose is good for the gander..

ICC should have clamped down on a lot things that are against their own laws but in their fear of certain sections, they let it pass.
And now they want to clamp down on MS Dhoni.
They should have let this pass, now this is going to blow hard for ICC - like all liberals, they will be exposed of not following the rules they have made when it comes to certain sections.

like all conservatives you are not really that bright.

repeat after me:
Politics and Religion are Different.
 
.
And which law does that all fall under? Last time I studied western law in contained the following "freedom of religion and expression"
ICC Laws.
G1 clause of clothing and equipment regulations."Players and team officials shall not be permitted to wear, display or otherwise convey messages through arm bands or other items affixed to clothing or equipment ("Personal Messages") unless approved in advance by both the player or team official's Board and the ICC Cricket Operations Department. Approval shall not be granted for messages which relate to political, religious or racial activities or causes."
 
.
ICC Laws.
G1 clause of clothing and equipment regulations."Players and team officials shall not be permitted to wear, display or otherwise convey messages through arm bands or other items affixed to clothing or equipment ("Personal Messages") unless approved in advance by both the player or team official's Board and the ICC Cricket Operations Department. Approval shall not be granted for messages which relate to political, religious or racial activities or causes."
Then the Indian violates those rules.
 
.
IMG_3205.JPG
 
.
I have read that ICC allows the glove manufacturer's logo as well as one advertiser's symbol on the gloves. Can we have one company registered with the same sign as that on MSD's gloves, to put this episode to an end, just saying..
 
. .
I have read that ICC allows the glove manufacturer's logo as well as one advertiser's symbol on the gloves. Can we have one company registered with the same sign as that on MSD's gloves, to put this episode to an end, just saying..
others will do nasty thing . imagine if some one registered a company named"sukhoi Slayer"with a logo of su-30 shot down by JF-17 .:)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom