What's new

IAF introduces AMRAAM Dodger patches for Su-30 MKI pilots on 27 Feb

IDRW is just a blog who copy pastes articles.
As per IAF citation some Sukhous were using jammers and some were maneuvering to increase chances of neutralizing the missiles.

IDRW has no credit so lets bring the source directly. Furthermore, why not to say that IAF MKIs were so busy saving themselves but in the end, it's coming from Modi land so can't expect any better of logic.
 
. .
IDRW is just a blog who copy pastes articles.
As per IAF citation some Sukhois were using jammers and some were maneuvering to increase chances of neutralizing the missiles.
Hahaha, so we did shot down SU30 that day, thank you dear Indian poster for clearing that up...since Jamming and maneuvering means one of the two were failing miserable i.e. the futile Jamming Su30 got shot while the manuvering su30 probably was farther away so only managed to out distance/ out range the missile.

Think about it, You might be the first Indian to actually get it other than IAF of cource, lol.
 
.
IDRW has no credit so lets bring the source directly. Furthermore, why not to say that IAF MKIs were so busy saving themselves but in the end, it's coming from Modi land so can't expect any better of logic.
IDRW aside.
MKIs were too far away to engage with their missiles.

Hahaha, so we did shot down SU30 that day, thank you dear Indian poster for clearing that up...since Jamming and maneuvering means one of the two were failing miserable i.e. the futile Jamming Su30 got shot while the manuvering su30 probably was farther away so only managed to out distance/ out range the missile.

Think about it, You might be the first Indian to actually get it other than IAF of cource, lol.
No.
The combination tactic was used to confuse the missiles even more to increase evasion chances.
 
.
No.
The combination tactic was used to confuse the missiles even more to increase evasion chances.
Please, for the love of almighty, read, understand, reply, lol.

Let me again quote the viper pilot here, lol:

As far as jammers and maneuverability that makes no sense. If you actually jam the missiles “in a matter of few seconds of them begin fired” then you don’t need to maneuver, they just won’t guide. If you need to maneuver then you probably aren’t jamming effectively, so this entire sentence is idiotic.
End quote.

Now don't turn around and say...wait, IAF didnt say that either, lol.
 
.
@pahadi I do not support trolling on the basis of mere fantasy & Modi propaganda. As you are sent off the thread, tagging you to read this from much more credible source than any of Indian mouthpiece.


DFRLab
@AtlanticCouncil’s Digital Forensic Research Lab. Catalyzing a global network of digital forensic…

Since all R-73 missiles were accounted for, the claims that the wing commander fired a missile before his aircraft was struck seem highly unlikely. The only way that an R-73 could have been fired during this engagement would be if the evidence presented in the March 17 tweet was fabricated, which the DFRLab could not confirm.
 
. . .
IDRW aside.
MKIs were too far away to engage with their missiles.


No.
The combination tactic was used to confuse the missiles even more to increase evasion chances.

This is all I have to say...
The day when PAF struck multiple Indian targets including Brig HQ (Bipin shocked) & AMMO dump (India placed urgent order of ATGMs purchase as the cache turns redundant) deep inside Indian occupied Kashmir; IAF was busy dodging AMRAAMs being fired by PAF in the air. So, IAF patch validates the version of Pakistan that "We shall surprise you".

Only IAF can do this to the Indian public that MKI on guard did not take any shot against PAF but were in the air to cost Pakistan 5 AMRAAMs which will heavily effect weak economy & Islamabad will go bankrupt due to better AAM purchases. By the same Indian logic, it also acknowledges the fact that PAF reached far from that IAF can imagine and MKIs were caught in surprise even though being touted as "Asian Raptor" & flying "Mini Awacs".

There is no source to support IAF claim of dodging AMRAAM. Here is what really happened. MKI tried to lock on PAF and in return, PAF did the same. MKI couldn't take the shot instead, PAF got the MKIs in surprise. Those 4 or 5 time locks, that MKI may have succeed to break are now being thought as some outmaneuvering/dodging AMRAAMS. In fact PAF had the lock on 3 more and now IAF has the patches by diverting otherwise.

The conclusion: The miserable sketch of MKI by saying that its missiles couldn't reach as such, is the only reason that Modi & corrupt men in uniform keep pushing for Rafale.
 
.
songs hamary copy karty hu,narrative bhi hamara ""we intentionally missed the balakot""" 300 dead bodies claim py bhad urwany ky baad,aab hamary patches bhi kuch tu originality dikhaoo :tdown:
 
.
T-03052019164902.png



D5n-e3fU8AEx5fK
why not first ask a third party to count them?
 
.
Lol! IAF first showing the debris of Aim -120 that hit Su-30 and now this one .
 
.
That's like when a hooker gets caught she says

He didnt bang me, it was love
 
. .
Perhaps this is the reason why PAF ground strikes on Indian military installations were so successful at a time when the "Asian raptor" was trying to save its arse from incoming Pakistani missiles.

Do Indians realise that this so called dodging was happening well within Indian airspace , Su30 getting harassed within it's own airspace. :D:D

Such a gem from IAF. :rofl:
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom