ISRO2
BANNED
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2009
- Messages
- 343
- Reaction score
- 0
MKI is better then MKK, in a dog fight, of course. but when they are locked and hunting by a missile, the odds of being shot down are more or less the same. furthermore, mind that MKK serve as long range attack bomber in PLAA, so they won't come out alone and will be escorted by other fighters, j11s for instance, and AWACs.
and one more thing, if there will be a war between china and india, which i highly doubt, why would china send their ACs into india territory? the HN-3 curise missiles could do almost all the job that a MKK can do.
Sir that was funny. mkk got longer range then mki? Sir please check google. Mki got long range, refueling ablity, superior avionic and list goes on. Sir why had u said mki got an edge only in dog fight? By its superior avionics mki dont need to engage in dog fight. Mki sees mkk first. Sir about awacs. Can u please tell me apart from america which country got better awacs then israel? india got awacs from israel that china wanted. Now sir lets move on to next weapon. Thank you.