koushik
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2011
- Messages
- 440
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
the article on wikipedia made me believe that the FGFA will also have carnards
dont trust wiki,its unreliable.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the article on wikipedia made me believe that the FGFA will also have carnards
the article on wikipedia made me believe that the FGFA will also have carnards
@ manishmaithani delete the comment bro or u'll be banned
They should use the remaining space for weapon bays or missiles
i agree with bolded part. it will increase depth of weapon bays. this way pak fa will be able to carry bigger weapons in its weapon bays like novator k 100.
That place is actually for the internal weapon bays.The current prototypes are built to test various aerodynamic performance parameter
i agree with bolded part. it will increase depth of weapon bays. this way pak fa will be able to carry bigger weapons in its weapon bays like novator k 100.
When it is used for weapon bays, since the plane is stealthy, the underpart will be flat so there is no loss of lift . There is no need to worry about the air escaping from sides as it will be perpendicular to direction of motion so it doesnt effect the drag & lift. Not mention the vertical thrust vectoring increases the lift and the best thing in PAKFA is the whole vertical stabilizer acts as a rudder resulting in high angle of attacks and more maneuverability.Something that I would have prefered as well, but the space is needed to create lift and add to it's aerodynamic performance, which the FGFA might need even more than Pak Fa, because of the additional weight.
It's there you do not need to troll.... soon you will see PAF flying j-20 before your PAK-FA
When it is used for weapon bays, since the plane is stealthy, the underpart will be flat so there is no loss of lift .
That's part of the lift body design, just like Flankers, Mig 29s, or F14 has it and flat fuselage doesn't mean more stealthy, the YF 23 fuselage has a similar design to create more lift and was considered to be more stealthy the the F22. The engine coverings of the Pak Fa needs to be shaped/angled and would be stealthy as well.
PAKFA is a matured platform.
Con Cojones q soi cubano chico...PakFa is an aerodynamics prototype ..
and Had canards....Even Mig1.44 is considered to be more stealthy than F-22.
It's there you do not need to troll.... soon you will see PAF flying j-20 before your PAK-FA
It's there you do not need to troll.... soon you will see PAF flying j-20 before your PAK-FA