'I had the honour of flying your brave son'

[Bratva]

Same to the soldiers who die for your country. Shall I say the same in the thread titled "Another martyr" that was started today, about a Lt who died in Pak?

Say whatever you want. We don't care. What matters is what Pakistan thinks about it's own soldiers.

 

[illusion8]

Say whatever you want. We don't care. What matters is what Pakistan thinks about it's own soldiers.

Thinking of what Munnawar hassan or Hamid Mir or Nawaz or Hussaien Haqqani or Geo or your current defense minister haveto say?

 

[janon]

Say whatever you want. We don't care. What matters is what Pakistan thinks about it's own soldiers.

Exactly our response to your first post. Glad you got the message.

That's how I guide people to the other person's POV.

 

[INDIC]

Then let's head to balochistan thread in War section. Let's do cherry picking there. Balochistan is not in Indian occupied kashmir last time I check.

oh really, do you want to know the history of both of the princely states, who signed the accession paper and who didn't sign the accession paper but got conquered.

 

[Levina]

Levina brought it up.

What a forlorn attempt at trolling kinggyy


If you're done teaching us urdu then let me tell you there's thread on a "Shaheed" Pakistani soldier,please visit
Another martyr
And understand that soldiers irrespective of which country they belong to,deserve respect for their supreme sacrifice.

 

[Bratva]

Thinking of what Munnawar hassan or Hamid Mir or Nawaz or Hussaien Haqqani or Geo or your current defense minister haveto say?

So does Pakistan revolve around these people genius?

Exactly our response to your first post. Glad you got the message.

That's how I guide people to the other person's POV.

Unless Kashmir was a proper state of India which is not. Even Kashmiri doesn't hold India and India army in high regards. So your response doesn't matter since Kashmir is being occupied by India and kashmiri opinion is what matter in this regard Just like Iraq or Afghani opinion would count most rather than an American one

 

[illusion8]

So does Pakistan revolve around these people genius?

Let's see.

Geo - your number one media outlet.
Hamid Mir - your top anchor
Munnaar Hassan - one of your top religious leader
Nawaz - your PM
Haqqani - your ex ambassador to US - now a major think tank
Kwaja - your present defense minister.
Iftikar - your present CJ.

who else is left - the army and ISI and ARY.

 

[Bratva]

oh really, do you want to know the history of both of the princely states, who signed the accession paper and who didn't sign the accession paper but got conquered.

Some Historical Inaccuracies !

 

[INDIC]

Unless Kashmir was a proper state of India which is not.

We don't call Kashmir as ilaka e ghair.

 

[Bratva]

Let's see.

Geo - your number one media outlet.
Hamid Mir - your top anchor
Munnaar Hassan - one of your top religious leader
Nawaz - your PM
Haqqani - your ex ambassador to US - now a major think tank
Kwaja - your present defense minister.
Iftikar - your present CJ.

who else is left - the army and ISI and ARY.

Uhmm,,, once again, does pakistan only consist of said persons?

 

[INDIC]

Some Historical Inaccuracies !

I am already aware of those apologist logics.

 

[Bratva]

We don't call Kashmir as ilaka e ghair.

Which shows we respected the choice of aforementioned areas and let them remain as it is. What's to laugh about? did you respected kashmiri and Junagarh wishes?

I am already aware of those apologist logics.

Which means you can't refute them nor have any facts at your hand nor the knowledge of region. Facepalm for debating without an iota of knowledge of region

 

[janon]

Unless Kashmir was a proper state of India which is not. Even Kashmiri doesn't hold India and India army in high regards. So your response doesn't matter since Kashmir is being occupied by India and kashmiri opinion is what matter in this regard Just like Iraq or Afghani opinion would count most rather than an American one

Again, I could say the same thing about your insurgencies - it's not what you think that matters but Balochis, and Balochistan is not a proper state etc.

See here's the thing - you are simply not understanding how Indians think when you say what you said. We consider Kashmir as an integral part, just as you consider all of Pak territory to be yours.

 

[INDIC]

Which shows we respected the choice of aforementioned areas and let them remain as it is. What's to laugh about? did you respected kashmiri and Junagarh wishes?


Which means you can't refute them nor have any facts at your hand nor the knowledge of region. Facepalm for debating without an iota of knowledge of region

I am allergic to fancy and pampered words. BTW, what's the need of roping in Junagadh in the discussion.

 

[Bratva]

Again, I could say the same thing about your insurgencies - it's not what you think that matters but Balochis, and Balochistan is not a proper state etc.

See here's the thing - you are simply not understanding how Indians think when you say what you said. We consider Kashmir as an integral part, just as you consider all of Pak territory to be yours.

But indians didn't have stack in Balochistan nor it is disputed area which India claim is its Hence comparing balochistan with kashmir is comparing apple and oranges.