What's new

Hypothetical Scenario - India vs Pak -China War (Conventional)

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is a bharati bullsh!t scenario. Wonder in which world you guys are living in. India is fighting two nuclear powers and loses only Tawang and some other area in South Tibet While Chinese lose whatever gains they made in Ladakh. And in Pakistan's case India is having some kind of picnic.

1 Karachi blocked and bombed
2 Lahore captured
3 Gujranwala caputed
4 Sialkot captured
5 Bahawalpur captured
6 Country divided in two
7 Gawadar destroyed
8 Baluchistan secedes
9 KKH destroyed
10 India moves to Multan
11 India moves towards Islamabad

And Pakistan is doing nothing except just bombing here and there. You bharatis really believe in this sh!t??? If YES then you are the most dumb people that live on this planet. :rofl:

India looses Assam, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh and makes gains on wastelands of Ladakh
 
. .
So basically pakistan achieves nothing and india destroys them as if they are invading bangladesh! India cant do all of this in a war only with pakistan let alone with china in it as well
 
.
too Indians, are you sure the Pakistan is actually the West Pakistan not our old east part :)as far as i know blockage of karachi and bombing some cities fine, but seriously capturing parts of Pakistan, with out full force and in few days and we didnt backfire ? seriously and save kashmir on two war front? seriously thats the best can you guyz dooo?

on serious note bangal to us will be kashmir to u in two front war?

ohh why both army didnt fight with some coordination? strange?
 
. .
So basically pakistan achieves nothing and india destroys them as if they are invading bangladesh! India cant do all of this in a war only with pakistan let alone with china in it as well

Ok Fair, I am not saying that this is perfect and gospel truth.
 
. .
India looses Assam, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh and makes gains on wastelands of Ladakh

Actually India only loses parts of AP and Assam while it destroys whole of Pakistan with Pakistan doing nothing.


This is the most unrealistic bullcr@p I have read. You forget about Lahore or Gujranwala or Karachi, even if you would try to take a small town like Fort Abbas which is very close to Pakistan's border with India, you would have to get your a$$es burnt to first capture Fort Abbas and then retain it. This is the realistic scenario.

Mazai laigai hoye hain.

1 Karachi blocked and bombed
2 Lahore captured
3 Gujranwala caputed
4 Sialkot captured
5 Bahawalpur captured
6 Country divided in two
7 Gawadar destroyed
8 Baluchistan secedes
9 KKH destroyed
10 India moves to Multan
11 India moves towards Islamabad

And Pakistan is just bombing Amritsar and Sirsa. :lol:
 
.
It is a bharati bullsh!t scenario. Wonder in which world you guys are living in. India is fighting two nuclear powers and loses only Tawang and some other area in South Tibet While Chinese lose whatever gains they made in Ladakh. And in Pakistan's case India is having some kind of picnic.

1 Karachi blocked and bombed
2 Lahore captured
3 Gujranwala caputed
4 Sialkot captured
5 Bahawalpur captured
6 Country divided in two
7 Gawadar destroyed
8 Baluchistan secedes
9 KKH destroyed
10 India moves to Multan
11 India moves towards Islamabad

And Pakistan is doing nothing except just bombing here and there. You bharatis really believe in this sh!t??? If YES then you are the most dumb people that live on this planet. :rofl:
that's because they have sunny deol on their side :-D :-D lolz typical bollywood masala scenario :-D let them live in fools paradise. :-D
 
.
too Indians, are you sure the Pakistan is actually the West Pakistan not our old east part :)as far as i know blockage of karachi and bombing some cities fine, but seriously capturing parts of Pakistan, with out full force and in few days and we didnt backfire ? seriously and save kashmir on two war front? seriously thats the best can you guyz dooo?

on serious note bangal to us will be kashmir to u in two front war?

ohh why both army didnt fight with some coordination? strange?

I think the author was taking into account numerical superiority of conventional forces of India into account. For China it would be difficult to bring large numbers initially into play but as this analysis show they eventually manage to capture large past of north east and are close to siliguri with all Indian forces in full retreat.
 
.
that's because they have sunny deol on their side :-D :-D lolz typical bollywood masala scenario :-D let them live in fools paradise. :-D

Matlab full mazai lagai hoye hain. Shadi main aayi hoyi hai Indian miltary. :D
 
.
Actually India only loses parts of AP and Assam while it destroys whole of Pakistan with Pakistan doing nothing.


This is the most unrealistic bullcr@p I have read. You forget about Lahore or Gujranwala or Karachi, even if you would try to take a small town like Fort Abbas which is very close to Pakistan's border with India, you would have to get your a$$es burnt to first capture Fort Abbas and then retain it. This is the realistic scenario.

Mazai laigai hoye hain.

1 Karachi blocked and bombed
2 Lahore captured
3 Gujranwala caputed
4 Sialkot captured
5 Bahawalpur captured
6 Country divided in two
7 Gawadar destroyed
8 Baluchistan secedes
9 KKH destroyed
10 India moves to Multan
11 India moves towards Islamabad

And Pakistan is just bombing Amritsar and Sirsa. :lol:

Look this is the kind of answer i was looking without any personal comments. I am no military tactician, there was something i found realistic and if its not then I would be glad if you could point out why like you just did.

Which video game is this? All three of them have nuckular weapons in real life.

Agreed, its a hypothetical scenario so infact not far from video game simulation with artificial constraints
 
.
Look this is the kind of answer i was looking without any personal comments. I am no military tactician, there was something i found realistic and if its not then I would be glad if you could point out why like you just did.

It is unrealistic because you already tried capturing Lahore, Sialkot and dividing then West Pakistan into two back in 1965 and you failed. Now today with nukes and even with kind of conventional weapons Pakistan has such kind of plans are not possible even if you are fighting Pakistan alone let alone with China in an all out war with you.
 
.
I think the author was taking into account numerical superiority of conventional forces of India into account. For China it would be difficult to bring large numbers initially into play but as this analysis show they eventually manage to capture large past of north east and are close to siliguri with all Indian forces in full retreat.
It will be multi Fronts war
Did You not seen shinzo Abe speech regarding china specific bill.

SCS will be the game starter

I don't think with geographical advantage india posse it's not easy that China can deploy full army small countries like Taiwan Vietnam etc will engage most Chinese territorial army

US and Japan will make PLA to deploy their major portion of the forces towards Eatern important cities like shanghai, Beijing

Western Destabilisation of Hong Kong will also effect China in longer run

There is huge chances China will avoid war
 
Last edited:
.
It is unrealistic because you already tried capturing Lahore, Sialkot and dividing then West Pakistan into two back in 1965 and you failed. Now today with nukes and even with kind of conventional weapons Pakistan has such kind of plans are not possible even if you are fighting Pakistan alone let alone with China in an all out war with you.

It's a fair point. I just thought India has two active borders China and Pakistan and initially China can't bring its huge conventional forces into India because of terrain and with defender's advantage India will be able to confine China to N. East. While with Paksitan India would have 2 to 1 numerical superiority with similar quality of tech to say the least hence this gains though wildly optimistic can be possible. I have made no comments on whether India can hold on to these territories.

You don't think so and that's totally fair.

P.S. As i stated at the top of my post its not my analysis but I found it on Quora and thought i would test it out.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom