Hyderabad Daccan wanted to be a part of Pakistan

[Safriz]

Indian army invaded and occupied Hyderabad daccan.

https://twitter.com/x/status/770087805804478464

 

[suresh1773]

The Razakars(Muslim rebels) were propagating unmitigated violence against the large Hindu population in the State of Hyderabad, Sardar Patel ordered the annexation of the princely state in September 1948.

 

[Safriz]

The Razakars(Muslim rebels) were propagating unmitigated violence against the large Hindu population in the State of Hyderabad, Sardar Patel ordered the annexation of the princely state in September 1948.

Sardar Patel wasn't the ruler or Hyderabad. The Nizam was. He wanted annexation with Pakistan.

 

[Tamilnadu]

Sardar Patel wasn't the ruler or Hyderabad. The Nizam was. He wanted annexation with Pakistan.

OK,apply that to Kashmir and move on and live a peaceful and prosperous life.

 

[Safriz]

OK,apply that to Kashmir and move on and live a peaceful and prosperous life.

Errrr. No , India should apply that to Kashmir.
The annexation of Kashmir was solely on Ruler's wish not people's.
But in Hyderabad case Ruler wanted to join Pakistan. So the same rule should be applied and Kashmir given to Pakistan.

 

[suresh1773]

Sardar Patel wasn't the ruler or Hyderabad. The Nizam was. He wanted annexation with Pakistan.

The Nizam wanted a independent rule and not annexation with Pakistan. It is the Nawab of Junagadh who wanted annexation with Pakistan.

 

[Tamilnadu]

Errrr. No , India should apply that to Kashmir.
The annexation of Kashmir was solely on Ruler's wish not people's.
But in Hyderabad case Ruler wanted to join Pakistan. So the same rule should be applied and Kashmir given to Pakistan.

In both cases rulers desided,if you want to ask Hyderabad then you should forget kashmir,both the situations are the same ,only difference is one party was able to take the whole part evev when the ruler wanted to join other party.

 

[satvikAcer]

Sardar Patel wasn't the ruler or Hyderabad. The Nizam was. He wanted annexation with Pakistan.

Sirf icha hone sew kya hoga,auqaat bhi honi chahiye

Errrr. No , India should apply that to Kashmir.
The annexation of Kashmir was solely on Ruler's wish not people's.
But in Hyderabad case Ruler wanted to join Pakistan. So the same rule should be applied and Kashmir given to Pakistan.

There aint no thing as a free lunch.

 

[Talwar e Pakistan]

Indians also committed many atrocities in Hyderbad

http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-24159594