Hussain Nawaz said in his television interview that no loan was taken from Qatar

[PakSword]

Who made him a Wakil, mut be safarshi wakil

even the professional lie to everyone for their agenda. Onus lies on the defender only If course takes a su-moto then its court against the accuser

Internationally, the burden of proof in the money laundering cases is on alleged perpetrator. In Pakistan, it is not clear. However, the way Aitzaz Ahsan stated in the program, he seemed to know the requirements to establish the money laundering crime.

I have seen a document which states:

Illicit enrichment – wealth of public officials that is manifestly out of proportion to his or her present or past official emolument – is criminalized in Bangladesh; Hong Kong, China; India; Malaysia; Nepal; Pakistan; the Philippines and Singapore. To enhance the effectiveness of this provision, India, Malaysia, Nepal, Pakistan and the Philippines have shifted the burden of proof to the accused.

You can also read the document on OECD.ORG: Sanctioning and Prosecuting Corruption and Related Offenses - OECD

The only thing is, whether SC is considering this case a money laundering case or not is not clear. If it is, then SC can ask ruling family to prove that the money used in buying property was earned and transferred legitimately. When a judge said that "aap saboot dain key paisay kahan say aaye aur kaisey bhijwaey, aur phir sukoon se ghar jaein" proves that SC is considering it a money laundering case.

 

[khail007]

punishment is not the problem but punishing the right people

Exactly and totally agree.

 

[Riz]

Courts dont accept what someone said on a TV show

Lol..and what if imran khan starts abusing Judges at TV , will they not take notice of imran action ?