walwal
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Messages
- 479
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
He's from Maharasthra too
Who ??? ......
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's from Maharasthra too
any remote chance of BJP and commies joining hands over there
That's dangerous for india.
Modi is a terrorist.
Just like Bhagat Singh, that is 2 of India's heroes!
Another sign that India grows more extremist by the day
NDA includes shiv sena in it. This will give your enemies a chance to play muslim card in india.
Britishers had the right to rule, better than the Hindus. And Bhagat Singh was a terrorist, a revolter, just like Mangal Panday, a disgusting man
Folks truth seer is an awesome troll master. And people are taking his bait willingly.
well kalyan singh has joined bjp again hope he can revive the party's fortunes in UP
I would throw my hat in with BJP if I didn't feel they were too Hindu-centric. Now I might come across as ignorant but the thing is India is fundamentally a secular nation and it is not fair for a party (BJP) to come that only represents or cares about one section of soceity (Hindus). Do Sikhs,Chrisitans,Jews,Muslims etc not deserve a secular govt? When I hear all this talk of Hindu-nationalism wrt the BJP and the RSS it really makes me uneasy as the above minorities are as Indian as their hindu brothers,no? Would Sikhs for instance be seen in a poor light by the BJP/RSS?
I'll admit Indian politics is not my strong point and I am out of my comfort zone here really. If I am Ill informed then anyone please feel free to educate me.
These are the kind of messages that unnerve me.
I would throw my hat in with BJP if I didn't feel they were too Hindu-centric. Now I might come across as ignorant but the thing is India is fundamentally a secular nation and it is not fair for a party (BJP) to come that only represents or cares about one section of soceity (Hindus). Do Sikhs,Chrisitans,Jews,Muslims etc not deserve a secular govt? When I hear all this talk of Hindu-nationalism wrt the BJP and the RSS it really makes me uneasy as the above minorities are as Indian as their hindu brothers,no? Would Sikhs for instance be seen in a poor light by the BJP/RSS?
I'll admit Indian politics is not my strong point and I am out of my comfort zone here really. If I am Ill informed then anyone please feel free to educate me.
These are the kind of messages that unnerve me.
One of the loudest cries which is often heard in the political gatherings all across the country is that the youth should play a more prominent role in politics and public administration.
But the fact is that despite the presence of youth wings of all major political parties, the presence (and the role) of the youth in national politics is inadequate.
In the current Indian Parliament, which has a mean age of 53 years, there are only 79 leaders who are under 42. Most of them are well-educated. Out of these, most young leaders are those who have an influential political background to back them up. A few young Members of Parliament are ministers as well. Britain, the country from which we derived much of our political framework, boasts of a 43-years-old PM in David Cameron. But back home, we have to make do with the likes of Manmohan Singh as a rule. Oldies like Sharad Pawar, S.M. Krishna, Karunanidhi, Pranab Mukherjee, L.K. Advani, Kapil Sibal, Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee etc. *** the Indian political landscape.
Pakistan recently appointed a 34-years-old elegant and beautiful Hina Rabbani Khar as their foreign minister. In India, none of the young MPs have been considered good enough to head an important ministry and have always been appointed as junior ministers.
Let's take a look at 10 prominent young politicians of India many of whom are also ministers:
Meet the Top 10 Young Politicians of India
AGE has nothing to do with CAPABILITY. Task of a PM requires both experience & leadership which is lacked by likes of Rahul Gandhi, it doesn't matter if a nation is run by a 20 year old or 90 year old, what matters is how they take there nation ahead. The young MPs which you are talking about, hardly take part in Parliamentary debates, question hours, etc. infact if you chk there attendance record, you'll get shocked that they hardly maintain an average of 40% while senior leaders (70+) maintain a healthy attendance rate. Young PMs & FMs only give good Photo-ops for the media, how they perform behind the scenes is a totally different debate.