Muhammad Omar
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2014
- Messages
- 13,558
- Reaction score
- 15
- Country
- Location
yes, yes he did...using his vedic ultra satellite tikinalijy!
Darn it vedic ultra satellite of certified supa powa 2020
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yes, yes he did...using his vedic ultra satellite tikinalijy!
As I said before, the development pattern of China's air defense systems is not the same as that of Russia.China was working on some S-400 counterpart, name starts with HQ but don’t remember the 2 digits after.
Any idea ?
yeah.Pdf?
is it accurate to say that russia develops different types of missiles to cover different parameters and ranges under the label of s400 while China develops 1 missile to cover all of those parameters and ranges under the name of HQ-9(or HQ-19)?As I said before, the development pattern of China's air defense systems is not the same as that of Russia.
Take S-400 for example, there are several kinds of missiles in one system. And there is only one kind of missile in HQ-9.
So, China won't develop a system similar to S-400.
No.is it accurate to say that russia develops different types of missiles to cover different parameters and ranges under the label of s400 while China develops 1 missile to cover all of those parameters and ranges under the name of HQ-9(or HQ-19)?
No,yeah.
is it accurate to say that russia develops different types of missiles to cover different parameters and ranges under the label of s400 while China develops 1 missile to cover all of those parameters and ranges under the name of HQ-9(or HQ-19)?
HQ-22 also looks similar to HQ-9:
View attachment 603655 View attachment 603656 View attachment 603657 View attachment 603658
HQ-22 can be called a low-cost variant of HQ-9.What capabilities it have??
HQ-22 can be called a low-cost variant of HQ-9.
The range of HQ-22 is over 100km, and China uses it to replace HQ-2.But what is difference between capabilities of both?
The range of HQ-22 is over 100km, and China uses it to replace HQ-2.
Can it match S-400 ?
Is it more mobile than S400? Is it comparable to S400?It is in the best interest of Pakistan to neither confirm or reject this news.
It's a system whose mobility brings a surprise for the enemy. And we love to kill it.
we don't have to match S-400 , we have to find a way to counter it, for example Advance EW Systems and Next Generation Long Range CM/SOW's .