What's new

How Xi Jinping’s “Controlocracy” Lost Control

dBSPL

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 2, 2018
Messages
7,661
Reaction score
28
Country
Turkey
Location
Turkey
Feb 10, 2020 XIAO QIANG
Asq_k5WA


Although the global coronavirus epidemic has only recently made international headlines, some in China have known about it since the beginning of December. Thanks to Chinese President Xi Jinping's high-tech dictatorship, that information was not made public, and the virus was allowed to take off.

BERKELEY – In his 2016 book The Perfect Dictatorship: China in the 21st Century, Norwegian political scientist Stein Ringen describes contemporary China as a “controlocracy,” arguing that its system of government has been transformed into a new regime radically harder and more ideological than what came before. China’s “controlocracy” now bears primary responsibility for the coronavirus epidemic that is sweeping across that country and the world.

Over the past eight years, the central leadership of the Communist Party of China has taken steps to bolster President Xi Jinping’s personal authority, as well as expanding the CPC’s own powers, at the expense of ministries and local and provincial governments. The central authorities have also waged a sustained crackdown on dissent, which has been felt across all domains of Chinese social and political life.

Under the controlocracy, websites have been shut down; lawyers, activists, and writers have been arrested; and a general chill has descended upon online expression and media reporting. Equally important, the system Xi has installed since 2012 is also driving the direction of new technologies in China. Cloud computing, big data, and artificial intelligence (AI) are all being deployed to strengthen the central government’s control over society.

The first coronavirus case appeared in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei province, on December 1, 2019, and, as early as the middle of the month, the Chinese authorities had evidence that the virus could be transmitted between humans. Nonetheless, the government did not officially acknowledge the epidemic on national television until January 20. During those seven weeks, Wuhan police punished eight health workers for attempting to sound the alarm on social media. They were accused of “spreading rumors” and disrupting “social order.”

Meanwhile, the Hubei regional government continued to conceal the real number of coronavirus cases until after local officials had met with the central government in mid-January. In the event, overbearing censorship and bureaucratic obfuscation had squandered any opportunity to get the virus under control before it had spread across Wuhan, a city of 14 million people. By January 23, when the government finally announced a quarantine on Wuhan residents, around five million people had already left the city, triggering the epidemic that is now spreading across China and the rest of the world.

When the true scale of the epidemic finally became clear, Chinese public opinion reflected a predictable mix of anger, anxiety, and despair. People took to the Internet to vent their rage and frustration. But it did not take long for the state to crack down, severely limiting the ability of journalists and concerned citizens to share information about the crisis.

Then, on February 3, after Xi had chaired the Standing Committee’s second meeting on the epidemic, the CPC’s propaganda apparatus was ordered to “guide public opinion and strengthen information control.” In practice, this means that cutting-edge AI and big-data technologies are being used to monitor the entirety of Chinese public opinion online. The controlocracy is now running at full throttle, with facial-, image-, and voice-recognition algorithms being used to anticipate and suppress any potential criticism of the government, and to squelch all “unofficial” information about the epidemic.

On February 7, Li Wenliang, one of the physician-whistleblowers who tried to sound the alarm about the outbreak, died of coronavirus, which unleashed a firestorm on social media. The Chinese public is already commemorating him as a hero and victim who tried to tell the truth. Millions have taken to social media to express their grief, and to demand an apology from the Chinese government and freedom of expression.

For the first time since coming to power, Xi’s high-tech censorship machine is meeting with intense resistance from millions of Chinese Internet users. The controlocracy is being put to the test. Most likely, though, the outbreak itself will be used to justify even more surveillance and control of the population.

Xi is an unabashed dictator. But his dictatorship is far from “perfect.” His obsessive need to control information has deprived Chinese citizens of their right to know what is happening in their communities, and potentially within their own bodies.

As of February 9, the outbreak has killed more than 900 people and infected another 40,000 in over 25 countries. For all its advanced digital technologies and extraordinary economic and military power, China is being governed as if it were a pre-modern autocracy. The Chinese people deserve better. Unfortunately, they and the rest of the world will continue to pay a high price for Xi’s hi-tech despotism.

https://www.project-syndicate.org/c...acy-spread-coronavirus-by-xiao-qiang-2020-02?


Xiao Qiang, Founder and Editor-in-Chief of China Digital Times, is a research scientist at the School of Information, University of California, Berkeley.
 
. .
...full reasonable control...
That is a contradiction. If you have full control over my speech, that is not reasonable -- FOR ME.

To be 'reasonable' is to agree to a compromise, which means I give some, you give some, and others give some. No one has full control over anyone and anything in the compact.
 
.
That is a contradiction. If you have full control over my speech, that is not reasonable -- FOR ME.

To be 'reasonable' is to agree to a compromise, which means I give some, you give some, and others give some. No one has full control over anyone and anything in the compact.

When foreign governments use media to incite local populations to bring down governments and create misleading information -- then it's up to the state to wrist control back.
 
.
When foreign governments use media to incite local populations to bring down governments and create misleading information -- then it's up to the state to wrist control back.
You mean like this...When China used the race card to incite communist revolutions in other Asian countries where there were Chinese living among the local populations?

Chapter 37

Deng Xiaoping's China

The Malaysians must be suspicious of Deng. There were underlying suspicions and animosity between Malay Muslims and Chinese in Malaysia, and between Indonesians and their ethnic Chinese. Because China was exporting revolution to Southeast Asia, my Asean neighbors wanted Singapore to rally with them, not against the Soviet Union, but against China.

Asean governments regarded radio broadcasts from China appealing directly to their ethnic Chinese as dangerous subversion. Deng listened silently. He had never seen it this light: China, a big foreign power, going over the governments of the region to subvert their citizens. I said it was most unlikely that Asean countries would respond positively to his proposal for a united front against the Soviet Union and Vietnam and suggested that we discuss on how to resolve this problem. Then I paused.

Deng's expression and body language registered consternation. He knew that I had spoken the truth. Abruptly, he asked, "What do you want me to do?" I was astonished. I had never met a communist leader who was prepared to depart from his brief when confronted with reality, much less ask what I wanted him to do. I had expected him to brush my points aside as Premier Hua Guofeng had done in Beijing in 1976 when I pressed him over the inconsistency of China's supporting the Malayan Communist Party to foment revolution in Singapore, not Malaya. Hua had answered with bluster, "I do not know the details, but whenever communists fight, they will win." Not Deng. He realized that he had to face up to this problem if Vietnam was to be isolated. I hesitated to tell this seasoned, weather-beaten revolutionary what he should do, but since he had asked me, I said, "Stop such radio broadcasts; stop such appeals. It will be better for the ethnic Chinese in Asean if China does not underline their kinship and call upon their ethnic sympathy. The suspicion of the indigenous peoples will always be there, whether or not China emphasizes these blood ties. But if China appeals to these blood ties so blatantly, it must increase their suspicions, China must stop radio broadcasts from south China by the Malayan and Indonesian Communist Parties.


Looks like governments will have to shut down those Confucius Institutes. :rolleyes:
 
.
You mean like this...When China used the race card to incite communist revolutions in other Asian countries where there were Chinese living among the local populations?

Chapter 37

Deng Xiaoping's China

The Malaysians must be suspicious of Deng. There were underlying suspicions and animosity between Malay Muslims and Chinese in Malaysia, and between Indonesians and their ethnic Chinese. Because China was exporting revolution to Southeast Asia, my Asean neighbors wanted Singapore to rally with them, not against the Soviet Union, but against China.

Asean governments regarded radio broadcasts from China appealing directly to their ethnic Chinese as dangerous subversion. Deng listened silently. He had never seen it this light: China, a big foreign power, going over the governments of the region to subvert their citizens. I said it was most unlikely that Asean countries would respond positively to his proposal for a united front against the Soviet Union and Vietnam and suggested that we discuss on how to resolve this problem. Then I paused.

Deng's expression and body language registered consternation. He knew that I had spoken the truth. Abruptly, he asked, "What do you want me to do?" I was astonished. I had never met a communist leader who was prepared to depart from his brief when confronted with reality, much less ask what I wanted him to do. I had expected him to brush my points aside as Premier Hua Guofeng had done in Beijing in 1976 when I pressed him over the inconsistency of China's supporting the Malayan Communist Party to foment revolution in Singapore, not Malaya. Hua had answered with bluster, "I do not know the details, but whenever communists fight, they will win." Not Deng. He realized that he had to face up to this problem if Vietnam was to be isolated. I hesitated to tell this seasoned, weather-beaten revolutionary what he should do, but since he had asked me, I said, "Stop such radio broadcasts; stop such appeals. It will be better for the ethnic Chinese in Asean if China does not underline their kinship and call upon their ethnic sympathy. The suspicion of the indigenous peoples will always be there, whether or not China emphasizes these blood ties. But if China appeals to these blood ties so blatantly, it must increase their suspicions, China must stop radio broadcasts from south China by the Malayan and Indonesian Communist Parties.


Looks like governments will have to shut down those Confucius Institutes. :rolleyes:

Funny, how is what China did any different than US spreading democracy?
 
. .
It's a big mistake to assume that Chinese government has total control over the Chinese population that popularized by the media.

Somehow a country who known as free and relaxed, turn out to be better.

Better in total control...
 
.
Talk to the Singaporeans, the Malays, the Cambodes, the Laotians, the Viets...And so on...See how many of them like what China did during the Cold War.
See how you keep beating the dead horse. China has stop spreading of communist 41 years ago and yet some keep hoarding to old things , thinking it's valid in 2020 context?

https://cil.nus.edu.sg/publication/...versary-of-dengs-historic-visit-to-singapore/

The next day , Lee responded to Deng’s presentation. He spoke for only half an hour. Lee said that China wanted the ASEAN countries to unite with China to isolate the ‘Russian bear’ but our neighbours wanted us to unite with them to isolate the ‘Chinese dragon’. Why did they fear China? They feared China because China supported the communist insurgencies in Southeast Asia, appealed to the ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia to help the motherland and made radio broadcasts from Southern China denouncing the regional governments.
Two years later, Deng stopped all such practices.

That is a contradiction. If you have full control over my speech, that is not reasonable -- FOR ME.

To be 'reasonable' is to agree to a compromise, which means I give some, you give some, and others give some. No one has full control over anyone and anything in the compact.
Of cos it's not reasonable becos spreading fake lies and manipulation are part of your task. Asking you to stop such thing is breaking your pay check. :enjoy:

Funny, how is what China did any different than US spreading democracy?
Do not trust this American words. China never did that. The American has one typical cheapshot. That is to accuse other of crime which they never commit. To the American, smearing other first is seems like a victory.

The American NCA spy on their citizen and foreign politician and they are quick to accuse China of spying only to be exposed by Snowden. Snowden is so sick of American CIA action that he feel need to uphold justice to bring some moral back to society.
 
.
See how you keep beating the dead horse. China has stop spreading of communist 41 years ago and yet some keep hoarding to old things , thinking it's valid in 2020 context?

https://cil.nus.edu.sg/publication/...versary-of-dengs-historic-visit-to-singapore/

The next day , Lee responded to Deng’s presentation. He spoke for only half an hour. Lee said that China wanted the ASEAN countries to unite with China to isolate the ‘Russian bear’ but our neighbours wanted us to unite with them to isolate the ‘Chinese dragon’. Why did they fear China? They feared China because China supported the communist insurgencies in Southeast Asia, appealed to the ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia to help the motherland and made radio broadcasts from Southern China denouncing the regional governments.
Two years later, Deng stopped all such practices.


Of cos it's not reasonable becos spreading fake lies and manipulation are part of your task. Asking you to stop such thing is breaking your pay check. :enjoy:


Do not trust this American words. China never did that. The American has one typical cheapshot. That is to accuse other of crime which they never commit. To the American, smearing other first is seems like a victory.

The American NCA spy on their citizen and foreign politician and they are quick to accuse China of spying only to be exposed by Snowden. Snowden is so sick of American CIA action that he feel need to uphold justice to bring some moral back to society.

That’s true what you say
 
.
Communism and democracy are both noble ideas.

If you are intellectual enough, beyond the propaganda influence of both sides.

The winner of the Cold War is the one who able to gain the benefit of both systems and eliminate the negative side.
 
. . . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom