How would Modi respond to a 26/11 like attack?

[foxbat]

Dumbo. India introduce terrorism in subcontinent as it trained mukti buhinis for years and planted them in east Pakistan.

Actually No. The first act of terrorism in post British subcontinent was executed by Jinnah when he sent the armed militants into the independent state of Kashmir in 1947 to over throw the maharaja of kashmir.

 

[asq]

Maybe WW3





India had to respond and help innocent Bengalis from being slaughtered

And how come, you do not help Kashmiris, dude. Your answer no matter will make you hypocrite or truthful. But I expect as an Indian you will spin this one too.

Actually No. The first act of terrorism in post British subcontinent was executed by Jinnah when he sent the armed militants into the independent state of Kashmir in 1947 to over throw the maharaja of kashmir.

You twist history again, dude, it was liaqat Ali khan and it was in response to Indians taking over Kashmir by force, so Pakistan had to defend what Pakistan thought that the association of all territories were to be decided by inhabitants as it was a case in many other states. So Kashmir was suppose to be part of those that kashmiris chose.

 

[Donatello]

Modi will ask Bollywood to make a film.

 

[invinciblesgunner]

He would do nothing, except for opening his mouth like he has done so war

 

[chhota bheem]

Modi will ask Bollywood to make a film.

If manmohan and sonia can get so much support from the world and agreeing that the terrorists came from pakistan.
Imagine what modi would have done,he would have minted you guys like there is no tomorrow.

 

[Donatello]

If manmohan and sonia can get so much support from the world and agreeing that the terrorists came from pakistan.
Imagine what modi would have done,he would have minted you guys like there is no tomorrow.

Still waiting for a response......

 

[SrNair]

Do not become personal, you so cleverly talk about intel and when reply you get uptight and become personal, typical Indian only master of spins.



Dumbo. India introduce terrorism in subcontinent as it trained mukti buhinis for years and planted them in east Pakistan.

There is no place for personal attack here.I mentioned about a typical behaviour of otherside.

 

[nair]

Do not become personal, you so cleverly talk about intel and when reply you get uptight and become personal, typical Indian only master of spins.



Dumbo. India introduce terrorism in subcontinent as it trained mukti buhinis for years and planted them in east Pakistan.

My friend ever heard the word called "Hypocrisy" , Read your first line, It accuses a member for being personal, and then you read the second line...... Was it personal???? Please maintain consistency, if not in a thread at least in a post....

 

[chhota bheem]

Still waiting for a response......

Responce for what ??????

 

[acetophenol]

Scenario:-

Five pairs of armed militants have infiltrated New Delhi. One team moves towards Red Quila,One team towards a famous school in South Delhi to create a hostage situation.The other three teams move towards a crowded hospital, A famous temple and a famous hotel respectively.

The police is alarmed and Home Ministry has sprung into action.

How would the Govt respond?

PS:- Its purely a hypothetical situation.

Firstly,Modi should make sure that no such security lapse exist,as we've already made that mistake and never should repeat it.
2. We should diplomatically attack the country responsible.
3. Under no circumstance,we should never spark of a war. We are already doing good and in the right path of development. We should not sacrifice that.

 

[foxbat]

You twist history again, dude, it was liaqat Ali khan and it was in response to Indians taking over Kashmir by force, so Pakistan had to defend what Pakistan thought that the association of all territories were to be decided by inhabitants as it was a case in many other states. So Kashmir was suppose to be part of those that kashmiris chose.

Every account except in Pakistani history books clearly shows that the Indian army landed in Kashmir only when the Pakistani sent terrorists were at the gates or Srinagar and maharaja of Kashmir requested assistence. Whatever may be the reason, Jinnah (or Liaqat Khan) sending armed non uniformed men to attack, pillage, rape and kill Kashmiri civilians was the first act of terrorism in post British subcontinent. Even if Jinnah was not directly instrumental in sending the tribals, by the virtue of being the leader of Pakistan at the time, he was responsible

Still waiting for a response......

Draw a graph of violence in Pakistan before and after 2008. You will see the response

 

[axisofevil]

And how come, you do not help Kashmiris, dude. Your answer no matter will make you hypocrite or truthful. But I expect as an Indian you will spin this one too.


You twist history again, dude, it was liaqat Ali khan and it was in response to Indians taking over Kashmir by force, so Pakistan had to defend what Pakistan thought that the association of all territories were to be decided by inhabitants as it was a case in many other states. So Kashmir was suppose to be part of those that kashmiris chose.

You ask me a question then accuse me of spinning it before I answer it. Great logic.....how about Pakistan donate 2000 crores like India did...if its such an integrl part of Pakistan?

 

[Donatello]

Every account except in Pakistani history books clearly shows that the Indian army landed in Kashmir only when the Pakistani sent terrorists were at the gates or Srinagar and maharaja of Kashmir requested assistence. Whatever may be the reason, Jinnah (or Liaqat Khan) sending armed non uniformed men to attack, pillage, rape and kill Kashmiri civilians was the first act of terrorism in post British subcontinent. Even if Jinnah was not directly instrumental in sending the tribals, by the virtue of being the leader of Pakistan at the time, he was responsible


Draw a graph of violence in Pakistan before and after 2008. You will see the response

Yes we sent the forces in Kashmir to liberate the land. And there is nothing you could do about it. Deal with it.

 

[foxbat]

Yes we sent the forces in Kashmir to liberate the land. And there is nothing you could do about it. Deal with it.

Dealt with it. And due to that mistake of Jinnah and Liaqut Khan, India not only owns 2/3 of the J&K state (which was going to fall in the lap of Pakistan if Jinnah had some patience) but also controls the water supply to the whole of Pakistan

 

[Donatello]

Dealt with it. And due to that mistake of Jinnah and Liaqut Khan, India not only owns 2/3 of the J&K state (which was going to fall in the lap of Pakistan if Jinnah had some patience) but also controls the water supply to the whole of Pakistan

Could've should've would've. Cannot believe what did not happen.

India invaded the state of Hyderabad, what was the guarantee that it would not do the same with the non-muslim ruler of Kashmir? Post partition, India and Pakistan were scrambling to protect their interests and as such were free to do as they wish.

Like i said, you believe in the trash taught to you. That is fine by me.