How will Nasr's Neutron warhead neutralize advancing enemy columns...

[AnnoyingOrange]

These So called Tactical arms will be the First One Which Will Be taken Out in war . Whenever Any army Invades the First strategy will Be Always To destroy Enemy Defenses May it Ground Or SEAD

Nasr Batteries has 60 Km Limited Range They Easy target For MBRL & Tactical arms Like Brahmos & Prahaar,Smerch ,Pinaka or Any Stand-off in CAS

Always Remember India will Always Out number the Ratio 5:1 there will Be always Be 5 Batteries of Tactical Arms Against 1 batteries of Nasr or babur to count In

The High Radiation Emission Makes this Weapon Vulnerable To Anti-Radiation Stand-offs they will be easily Picked up By Military recon Surveillance Satellite's

These good Nuclear Yahoos don't know that .. Indian Army will have direct access to live satellite imagery with upto 10 Mtr accuracy across Indian subcontinent to pinpoint where Pakistani Defense assets are located to pinpoint initial attacks and destroy these so called Nuclear game changers.... They still think all those satellites India has been launching are there to take fun images of earth....

 

[NKVD]

These good Nuclear Yahoos don't know that .. Indian Army will have direct access to live satellite imagery with upto 1 Mtr accuracy across Indian subcontinent to pinpoint where Pakistani Defense assets are located to pinpoint initial attacks and destroy these so called Nuclear game changers.... They still think all those satellites India has been launching are there to take fun images of earth....

Yes,Deployment of these Batteries Will be Limited in Number.They Cannot Deploy More than 1 or 2 Batteries of Tactical Nukes.There Always a Ground Intel of these Deployment. Nasr is itself is vulnerable to Anti-radiation Stand-off & MRBL Smerch & Pinaka is Enough To take out Such Threat From Distance India Also Has IAI Harpy Low level Loiter Drones Dedicate to Such Jobs

 

[Paksanity]

These So called Tactical arms will be the First One Which Will Be taken Out in war . Whenever Any army Invades the First strategy will Be Always To destroy Enemy Defenses May it Ground Or SEAD

Nasr Batteries has 60 Km Limited Range They Easy target For MBRL & Tactical arms Like Brahmos & Prahaar,Smerch ,Pinaka or Any Stand-off in CAS

Always Remember India will Always Out number the Ratio 5:1 there will Be always Be 5 Batteries of Tactical Arms Against 1 batteries of Nasr or babur to count In

The High Radiation Emission Makes this Weapon Vulnerable To Anti-Radiation Stand-offs they will be easily Picked up By Military recon Surveillance Satellite's

These good Nuclear Yahoos don't know that .. Indian Army will have direct access to live satellite imagery with upto 1 Mtr accuracy across Indian subcontinent to pinpoint where Pakistani Defense assets are located to pinpoint initial attacks and destroy these so called Nuclear game changers.... They still think all those satellites India has been launching are there to take fun images of earth....

Good luck with that.

Try using those sattelites to find some water for your villagers.

 

[Moon]

trajectory

Corrected. Projectory is a business lingo, my mind was elsewhere.

As per reports

May I see officially documented reports? With a neutral source and confirmation.

 

[Moon]

notonly Pakistan but also India did't release official statements on these subjects..we have to study journals of neutral sources...google it

You're the one who raised the matter, where's the source?.

 

[Gufi]

These So called Tactical arms will be the First One Which Will Be taken Out in war . Whenever Any army Invades the First strategy will Be Always To destroy Enemy Defenses May it Ground Or SEAD

Listen now, this is the last time I am repeating myself or explaining this

• We know what you have and we know what you plan to do and we know what to expect. Give our generals the respect we gave your army to make nukes to counter it. We know how to defend them and we know what will be thrown at them.
• Stop talking about nuclear war being bad, say war is bad... Try that line and repeat it...Conventional or nuclear, both are bad... which is worse is not the debate... Otherwise you believe that any war India gets harmed is bad, otherwise war is good
• Go to your politicians and tell them to triple the national budget on internal defence and security and border watch... Instead of blaming others for your problems fix them

The rest are answered, read all the posts and find the answers, if something is missed then it was missed for a reason...

You're the one who raised the matter, where's the source?.

Lala land school of BS

 

[Taygibay]

It is a deterrent not an offensive weapon.

Why dont you lecture you immediate neighbour France first then come to us teaching morality.

UH? Smuhs mate, you went wrong on both counts, sorry to say!

A- Neutron bombs were made for offense as you don't want to kill ...
. . . all living creatures on/near your own soil ( as in a defensive posture );
B- France gave up its Neutron bombs* for moral ( and practical ) reasons itself.

* Pluton ( 10kt/120 km ) and Hades ( 80kt/480km ) tank launchers made to advance with our troops :

The moral point central to non-use of neutron bombs is that they kill more civilians than soldiers every time ...​

unless your enemy advances in a huddle and camps out in far out deserted spots.

Just sayin', Tay.

 

[Hamza913]

They aren´t. You have a gargantuan danger of islamists gaining acess to those weapons.

Do you have institutions in Pakistan that could even stop a democratic elected government to have acess to those weapons?

Oh yeah yeah, put a sock in it. You lot have been saying that same line for the past 10 years. It will never happen. But you're too stupid to know that.

As for institutions to stop a government from using nukes, we have the military. They prevent the government from doing anything stupid.

 

[Tipu7]

unless your enemy advances in a huddle and camps out in far out deserted spots.

This is the Point

 

[FunkyGen]

Look at the map again buddy.

Well, we have Kashmir and Punjab too... just saying...

No.. By your retarded logic, Pakistan is the land of tall, light skinned people (which somehow is a special attribute... And that makes you guys racist)

I can only imagine the ostracization Sindhis, Baloch must be feeling in your country just on the basis of skin color.

Nah they still don't look like the avg. indian... that was my point... i don't really want to post pics here now... i don't want to puke...

 

[randomradio]

Nasr can maneuver and change it's trajectory. Again, typical of you, undermining others, glorifying yourself.

Rockets don't change trajectory, nasr does..

So does that mean all aircraft are immune from SAMs? Aircraft can change their state in 3 dimensions, not just trajectory.

Iron Dome is a SAM, Nasr is in fact a very simple rocket. It is not ramjet so any change in trajectory is predictable.

Iron domb missed many rockets mate, forget about missile.

No. Iron Dome did not miss, or you can say it rarely misses. At least the figures from Gaza indicate a 90% interception rate. The Israelis purposely did not target a lot of rockets too. It's success was enough for the IAF to show interest in the Iron Dome after having dismissed it once.

Also, as I said, they have developed a brand new Iron Dome. We are yet to see that.[/QUOTE]

 

[Pandora]

UH? Smuhs mate, you went wrong on both counts, sorry to say!

A- Neutron bombs were made for offense as you don't want to kill ...
. . . all living creatures on/near your own soil ( as in a defensive posture );
B- France gave up its Neutron bombs* for moral ( and practical ) reasons itself.

* Pluton ( 10kt/120 km ) and Hades ( 80kt/480km ) tank launchers made to advance with our troops :

The moral point central to non-use of neutron bombs is that they kill more civilians than soldiers every time ...​

unless your enemy advances in a huddle and camps out in far out deserted spots.

Just sayin', Tay.

Point being you will use whatever needs be when time comes. Same goes for pakistan we dont want war but if imposed we are obliged to show the hell on earth. Unless we have got conventional force like france we will make use of all we have in our arsenal.

 

[barbarosa]

The Muslim fight for hereafter not to occupy land,but defend his country.The next war wood be the great mediation for hereafter life.

 

[باپ]

It is a moot point, Indian doctrine will force it to attack Pakistan with its retaliation, at which time Pakistan will also fire its Nuclear weapons. The air will be full of Ballistic missile launches and that will be end of the region.
That is why we want no war, not no nuclear war, but no war. The idiocy of your post was such that it could not be answered seriously. What answer do you want when we say it is a tested method and we know what we are doing. You argue and I remind you that weapons are not all tested against people or actually field tested but once a concept is clear, you go with lab work. Radiation levels are measured and their after effects noted.


Indian doctrine, not macho ism which dictates any use of WMD, of any size will get a disproportionate answer from India which will break down into MAD.

You clearly are ranting without knowing. Nasr isn't a WMD.

 

[Gufi]

You clearly are ranting without knowing. Nasr isn't a WMD.

India’s nuclear doctrine also doesn’t differentiate between types of nukes — it assures a “no first use”, but promises a “massive retaliation” in response to any nuclear strike.
Thus even a tactical nuke leads to MAD... Which is why the threshold has been lowered which is why war can be avoided...