he claimed it no more and his land was Bahrain ... His Army was Arab ...and he has nothing with Persian ... back there majority of his birthplace were Sunni ...
I knew Genaveh , I was there ....
He has nothing with persian? what do you mean?
he was a persian who claimed to be persian of royal descent or some people put forward that he is of royal descent. If that was insignificant, that would probably not be mentioned.
Yes his army would have been for majority arab, since the base of his movement was Bahrain (which by the way even in pre-islamic times had a persian zoroastrian population) and after Islam also had a significant persian population.
You also said that no persian was part of the invasion of kaaba or had to do with that with that incident. Well the persian brother of this person (
Bahram) known as
Abū-Tāhir Sulaymān Al-Jannābī, attacked kaabah. He was the leader of the Qarmatian state of Bahrain. He personally desectrated, looted, raided Mecca (read my earlier comments). yes the movement was mostly based on religion (qulat ismailism), however we cannot deny that persians played a role in this movement.
The
Qarmatian Sevener branch accepted a Persian prisoner by the name of Abu'l-Fadl al-Isfahani from
Isfahan, who claimed to be the descendant of the Persian kings, as the returned Muhammad ibn Ismail. Al-Isfahani had been brought back to Bahrain from the Qarmatians' raid into Iraq in 928.
In 931, Abū-Tāhir turned over the state to this Mahdi-Caliph, who instituted the worship of fire and the burning of religious books during an eighty-day rule. The events now took a different course from what had been predicted by the Carmatians for the advent of the Mahdi. Instead of revealing the truths behind all previous religions, the young Isfahani, who claimed descent from the Persian kings and manifested anti-Arab sentiments, turned out to be a restorer of Persian religion. Said to be a Magian, he ordered the worship of fire and the cursing of all prophets, also instituting a number of ceremonies that shocked the Carmatians. He evidently had some links with established Zoroastrianism, for the chief priest of the Zoroastrians, Esfandīār b. Āḏarbād, was soon after accused of complicity with Abū Ṭāher and executed on the orders of the ʿAbbasid caliph Rāżī (Masʿūdī,
Tanbīh, pp. 104-05). When the Isfahani Mahdi began, furthermore, to execute the notable Carmatians of Bahrain, Abū Ṭāher had him killed and admitted that he had been an imposter. His reign lasted only eighty days