What's new

How was India under Muslim rulers & how British ruined the country

Status
Not open for further replies.

airmarshal

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
9,361
Reaction score
11
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
This is a draft to destroy the country and rebuild it on an inferiority complex that whole of South Asia suffers from even to this day

BdZXmFQCMAAoUAF.jpg
 
. .
:lol:

Muslim is not mentioned anywhere in this cutting - Your title will server nothing but troll festival.
sir,your fellow countryman has opened a troll thread.
 
. .
Why troll? When Lord Macaulay was traveling the length and breadth of the country, who was ruling India from Delhi?
 
. .
A troll alert :lol:

Why troll? When Lord Macaulay was traveling the length and breadth of the country, who was ruling India from Delhi?

It was the sikhs and the Marathas.!
By 1835, it was the Sikhs who had some power.
 
. .
No one was ruling India from Delhi :lol:
Why bust his bubble, he might bring in the ancient education system introduced to us uncivilized hindus by Central Asians laureates
 
.
Before Muslim rule, India was even better......
Muslims wreaked havoc and the Brits gave the final blow......a country once known for its riches, became a 'third world country'.....
Even during those era of very limited means of communication, India was known world-wide and just to establish an alternate and secure trade route to India, the Europeans(Columbus) dared mighty sea....
 
Last edited:
.
Lol!! this document is bogus. Mcaualy was not even in Britain to address the house on that day. 1835 India was a poor man's place. Even if he had said so later or earlier,everyone would have made a hell laugh of him.

Edit: In 1835, an Englishman did not speak the way Macaulay's supposed speech was delivered. Even a regular sentry spoke with much better construction of words and fine vocabulary.
 
Last edited:
.
This thread is evidently intended to show that India under Muslim rule was a Garden of Eden and that the Brits ruined its economy.

Implying thereby that the Muslim rule was better.

Both assumptions are incorrect.
 
.
Well if you look at the hygiene difference today between Hindus and Muslims you can get a small idea. In India more than half the population has no toilets and defecate on the streets under non Muslim control. I personally would never visit India no offense meant but their hygiene makes my stomach turn. I have seen many videos.
 
.
Again why do people put so much emphasis on religion. It was the culture and the moral values that stunned the British. Religion is only a part of it, and back them as it is now Hindus and Muslims made majority of the population, so not just one religion.
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom