How UK destroyed Indian economy..

[kawaraj]

the British instilled hidden evil obedience into SOME modern Indian minds as we can observe from the thread replies. Until these minds out of Indian mainstream India won't even be real modern nation.

 

[Hello_10]

the British instilled hidden evil obedience into SOME modern Indian minds as we can observe from the thread replies. Until these minds out of Indian mainstream India won't even be real modern nation.

most of the Indians here are based in Western Nations so they are willing to justify every wrong of Western nations, they did in past and want to continue doing in this world, to confirm their dominance/ looting of rest of the world. while whatever technologies US has, a big share belong to those High Qualified Indian Professionals who helped US have those techs, as, how under high school passed people of US/West may develop technologies?????

in Past, life was tough and technologies were poor, not only in India but in whole world. and even if British could get good technologies during 19th/20th centuries, it were mainly developed by the Indian professionals who helped them have those techs, the British picked those Indians by conducting different exams. and its the Indian culture which powered Indian Origins have this capabilities. for example, Mr Gandhi was the man who wanted the Indian Industries to be modernized, while the Western Indians here want to prove, "Mr Gandhi wanted the Indians to live in poverty"? while even the most of techs Britain used in 19th and 20th centuries, were mainly developed by the Indians they picked from India????? this way, first British got technology by Indians in 19th/20th centuries and at the same time they have these Indians based in Western nations who may prove India/Indian Culture wrong??????????

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

today I saw a show of Mr Amir Khan where he brought a man who was arguing, "by putting coins in reservoirs, India could have big Water Reserves in past but British destroyed that tradition." means, Indians were living in wrong belief and British destroyed that culture, helping India get modern. while in reality, having big Water Reservoir was the best technology available that time, the Indian Kings had till British came to in 19th century. and with their technology, Indian Kings used to put coin in those reservoirs also to get help from God to get good rain, a touch of belief with that technology......

we find, the current Indian government, backed by few traitors, have infused every government resource of India to do wrong publicity about Indian culture, indian people and Mr Amir Khan also looks like the one who is part of this type of wrong publicity about India. Mr Amir Khan always confirm the wrong intentions of his shows.......

Influenced by the Bhagvad Gita and Hindu beliefs, the Jain religion and the Christian teachings of Leo Tolstoy, Gandhi moved on the path of Satya and Ahimsa. ‘Satya’ meaning ‘truth’ and ‘ahimsa’ meaning ‘non-violence’ were the two weapons that Gandhi used to fight the enemy.

Gandhi inspired people to boycott British goods and refuse earthy possessions. This movement was known as Swaraj and was economically significant because Indian home industries were virtually destructed by British industrialists. He advocated renewal of native Indian industries and began to use a spinning wheel as a token of return to simple village life. Thereafter, he constantly began promoting satyagraha, non-violence, non-cooperation and swaraj to achieve independence. Finally, in August 1947, the British were forced to leave India.

mohandas karamchand gandhi

 

[Srinivas]

India as a country benefit from British India. Without the British, there won't be an India. It would composed of many princely states with a Muslim empire and a Hindu empire some where in the Indian subcontinent. So India should regard Britain as the mother country and the queen the head of the state.

Yes just like the Han chinese still regard mongol Yuan empire as their own and Kublai khan territories as their own

 

[Hello_10]

Yes just like the Han chinese still regard mongol Yuan empire as their own and Kublai khan territories as their own

in australia, British empire killed 90% of Indigenous people, and how they did in India is also written on wall, i have made many posts about it. British only looted/robbed different parts of world and killed whoever resisted their intentions in this world :pop

The effect of British colonisation on Aboriginal people

Between 1788 and 1900, the Aboriginal population was reduced by 90%. Three main reasons for this were the introduction of new diseases, loss of land and loss of people through direct fighting with the colonisers.

Consequences of British colonisation for Aboriginal People, British colonisation of Australia, Colonisation: resources, power and exploration, SOSE Year 6, QLD | Online Education Home Schooling Skwirk Australia

 

[Hello_10]

Dude it doesn't matter how much you play with the words, the fact that only thing in between PRC's boots and Taiwan's a$$ is US. If not for US you would have become PRC's part a long time ago. So its high time that you make a Black American Obama as your head of state and not some Hans.

Indian growth story started in 1991 and see who was in power then. As for her dig at Sonia Gandhi...most Indians are not xenophobic like you.

one more news for you as below. Pakistan was one year ahead than India in liberalization of its economy. I think, if Mr Nawaz Sharif might be in power in India then he might have done the same economic liberalization one year before in 1990? this way, at least Indians could say that its their own open market policy which accelerated its growth since 1991, which was not copied from Pakistan

India copied Pak reforms in 1990s

Islamabad: Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) chief Nawaz Sharif has said India copied his government’s initiatives in the 1990s.

Sharif said Indian reforms that were initiated in 90s by the government of Narasimha Rao were influenced by industrial reforms initiated by his government in Pakistan, reports the Daily Times.

Sharif was the prime minister in October 1990 and initiated an ambitious economic programme. In June 1991, Rao became the Indian prime minister and appointed Manmohan Singh as the finance minister. Soon the rupee was devalued and Rao abolished industrial licensing and other socialist measures which India had not adopted until then.

"If not for corrupt governments that followed later, Pakistan would have been on the path of economic growth by now," said Nawaz. He criticised President Asif Ali Zardari and former military ruler Pervez Musharraf, and also blamed the two for the increase in conflict and militancy in Pakistan.

Calling upon Pakistani nationals living abroad to come forward and help change Pakistan, Sharif said returning him to power would be the only way for Pakistan to once again move forward towards economic progress and social stability.

India copied Pak reforms in 1990s: Nawaz Sharif

 

[satishkumarcsc]

one more news for you as below. Pakistan was one year ahead than India in liberalization of its economy. I think, if MR Nawaz Sharif might be power in India then he might have done the same economic liberalization one year before in 1990? this way, at least Indians could say that its their own open market policy under its own leader which accelerated its growth since 1991, which was not copied from Pakistan

And our economy is right now the second fastest growing economy in the world and is becoming one of the major competitors in the business world. I don't see Pakistan in that list. What happened in between....Point to remember is both the countries were democracy and had two parties ruling them at that time till 1999.

 

[Hello_10]

And our economy is right now the second fastest growing economy in the world and is becoming one of the major competitors in the business world. I don't see Pakistan in that list. What happened in between....Point to remember is both the countries were democracy and had two parties ruling them at that time till 1999.

in fact, Pakistan itself copied its economic policy from China, ASEAN region who adopted this open market strategy since 70s. and then after learning from their experience of over a decade, then only Mr Nawaz Sharif adopted economic liberalization in Pakistan in 1990. and here Mr Nawaz Sharif can only say that India copied and learned from China, ASEAN, Pakistan all and then they adopted the path of industrialization in 1991

but yes the only credit goes to Mr Nawaz Sharif that he is the man who first introduced economic liberalization in South Asia region