1. You and this news agency are expanding a straight crime to seem like a "Jihad" conspiracy.
2. In marriage crime cases have there have been no Hindu-on-Hindu murders in the last 73 years ? For decades there were those "stove burst accidents" where dowry-harassed women were bumped off by their husbands and in-laws. Are these acceptable to you ?
3. Look at the attitude of her brother :
Firstly the brother is not really mourning. This attitude can easily be of family members of a Hindu woman who married of her choice to someone of her own ( Hindu ) caste. Don't honor killings happen among Hindus ? There recently was a special Friday episode on Kaun Banega Crorepati in which a womens rights activist spoke about one Hindu woman who was terribly harassed by her in-laws so the activist took her back to her paternal home and spoke of divorce but they said that no one in their family had divorced. Two days later the harassed woman hanged herself. Is this too acceptable to you because the criminals and the victim were Hindus ?
I am not interested in your moral judgement of the victims family. Who are you to read their mind ?
Killing for dowry is called "dowry killing" and there are specific laws for that, killing of hindu girls for refusing to convert is called "love jihad".
Remember Rahul Rajput ?
A Hindu boy Beaten to death for having a Muslim girlfriend. By the girls relatives. (of course "secular" media chose to HIDE the religious angle to this killing)
Speaking to the media, the girlfriend of the deceased boy said that she received a call around 6 PM on Thursday from one of her maternal uncle’s son, who asked her regarding Rahul. The girl, reportedly said to her brother that Rahul was not using his mobile phone as his mother had sold it off. After that the girl the number of some other relative of Rahul to her cousin. After getting the contact number, her relative called up Rahul and asked him to meet them. The girl said that her brothers had asked Rahul to meet them to discuss tuitions.
Narrating the incident, the girl said, “Rahul asked me whether we should go and meet my brother. I said as it was a matter of just five minutes, let’s go. I went out and called my brother, who immediately arrived at the spot and starts brutally assaulting Rahul. I tried hard to save Rahul but could not save him.” She said that she kept yelling that Rahul’s health is not well, don’t beat him, but they didn’t spare him and continued to beat him.
The girl has also confessed that her brother were the masterminds behind the killing of 18-year-old Rahul Rajput on the suspicion that he had a love affair with the teenage Muslim girl.
Talking to Aaj Tak, the girl revealed that her own brother Raj, her two cousins Shahanwaz and Kaif, her neighbor and distant relative Tajuddin, Shahanwaj’s friend Hussain, and 3-4 goons who are friends of Hussain were part of the assault.
Exclusive: Rahul Rajputs friend reveals details of murder, accuses Delhi Police of inaction
The friend of a Delhi University (DU) student, who was beaten to death allegedly over an affair with her in Delhi, has claimed that the victim Rahul Rajput was killed after proper planning.
zeenews.india.com
Perhaps Dr. Ambedkar was not in immediate company of progressives Muslims who understood the the real, socialist spirit of Islam. You should read this thread of mine about modern socialist / communist activism among Muslims since 1900. Perhaps Ambedkar thought Islam and modern socialism and communism to be too radical to adopt. Perhaps Gandhi ji's ideas made him see Islam as an external other ( that word "denationalize" ).
But you did not say why supposedly Dharmic Buddhist structures and people were killed off by Dharmic Hindu rulers and you did not say why Rohith Vemula's three family members adopted Buddhism instead of remaining in Dharmic Hinduism.
Buddhism flourished for a 1000 years in Hindu India before the islamic invasion. That should tell you all that you need to know.
Rohit was obviously a Ambedkarite. Perfectly legal.