On the contrary, I am the only one who has accepted whenever proof has been provided or when logical posts are posted.
None of my claims have proved anything but fact, not a single one as unlike you I accept reality. By the way didn't you say something about 1m^2? at 400km's (and not 2m^2?). I still await proof of that.
It was a Mig-21 that downed the atlantique that's why it has 1m^2 RCS? And the Bison was able to achieve such unbelievable feats of reducing it's RCS 2 times just be RAM coatings??? I'd like proof of that too please. As well as it's RCS when loaded!
Now see, you are making claims but are unable to prove them. You keep saying that Phalcons can look farther & track more targets but you do not provide any evidence to back your claims. Most likely the Phalcon does see further and is able to track more targets and faster too. But you make it as if the Phalcon is 1 end of technological spectrum and the Eri-eye the other (high and low). I'd like you to prove that with evidence and not just hollow words.
What makes Phalcon a scooter?
And what details do you have of the KJ-2000 or even 200? As far as I know, the Chinese never got anything that resembles the Phalcon except the hollow core then why is the KJ2K comparable to Phalcon's "watered down earlier model"??
Your facts.. said that JF17 fires Aim120,
PAF ordered Aim120C5.
Singapore AF doesn't allow IAF pilots study their aircrafts.
And many more... which I forgot...
I said that I read about those figures in some books/journals years ago.
Even simple browsing through internet or a little understanding about radars would explain that to you.
If you can't browse or don't understand then its not my problem.
Thats was for the Kamikazi comment you made about Mig21 which by far is the most produced aircraft after the 2nd WW.
Go and read about the difference RAM had on F16 RCS clean[reduction from 5m^2 to 1.2m^2].. Bison had similar upgrade in this regard.. It RCS stands well below normal Mig21 and is around 1m^2 or less.
A normal Air-Air configuration would add about 2-3m^2.
No body can provide you with evidence... there are somethings which are understood however It was my mistake that I posted something your Brain cannot understand.
Your question is similar to asking proof as to why a truck carriers more load and a car cannot.
I don't have time for such elaborate explanation which would again go wasted thanks to your IQ and understanding abilities.
http://www.iai.co.il/sip_storage/FILES/5/37545.pdf
There you go... you can't even understand little examples...
Your Brain is worse than that of the dumbest person I've come across.
Chinese got a lot of help from Israel which included antenna design and some classified information which only the Israeli and Chinese engineers know... they were very close to sign the deal when the US govt. blocked it.
The information offered by Israel was for financial benefits and It was against their interests to provide their top information to Chinese which could help anti-Israeli groups in long run.
Besides there were newer version of the AWACS radar evolved with the EL/W-2090 being the latest... used in the Phalcon AWACS project.
EL/W-2090 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia