jamahir
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2014
- Messages
- 28,132
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
let it be said once for all about the godhra train-burning incident ( gujarat 2002 )...
1. it was an accident.
2. the train's passengers were not innocents returning from a picnic... this was a "special" train returning from ayodhya where a decade ago, maddened crowds had demolished babri mosque and initiated riots in india... i am not even talking of the threats the crowds had issued to the female journalists covering the mosque demolishing... the train's passengers were "pilgrims" who had gone to ayodhya to perform rituals at the temple built on the site of the demolished mosque... so, the passengers were indirect criminals, including the females.
3. at godhra train station, during this train's short halt, some of these hinduvaadi passengers had misbehaved with a muslim lady which led to anger among godhra's muslims.
4. the supposed attack on the train, by the muslim crowd, happened when the train was moving and the railway tracks were quite high, sitting on earthern bund.
5. the fire that burnt the train started on the inside... it is very possible that these hinduvaadi passenger families were carrying fuel for cooking food within the train during the long journey from ayodhya.
6. some of the above points were found during when laloo prasad yadav was railway minister later.
i ask the pdf members... why didn't nato invade india in 2002 because real massacre had happened against muslims in gujarat, organized and helped by the state government there... nato invaded libya and syria on fake charges of human rights violations... why is nato and usa government shaking hands with modi when he should have been tried in the international criminal court...
@Jungibaaz @Horus @WebMaster
1. it was an accident.
2. the train's passengers were not innocents returning from a picnic... this was a "special" train returning from ayodhya where a decade ago, maddened crowds had demolished babri mosque and initiated riots in india... i am not even talking of the threats the crowds had issued to the female journalists covering the mosque demolishing... the train's passengers were "pilgrims" who had gone to ayodhya to perform rituals at the temple built on the site of the demolished mosque... so, the passengers were indirect criminals, including the females.
3. at godhra train station, during this train's short halt, some of these hinduvaadi passengers had misbehaved with a muslim lady which led to anger among godhra's muslims.
4. the supposed attack on the train, by the muslim crowd, happened when the train was moving and the railway tracks were quite high, sitting on earthern bund.
5. the fire that burnt the train started on the inside... it is very possible that these hinduvaadi passenger families were carrying fuel for cooking food within the train during the long journey from ayodhya.
6. some of the above points were found during when laloo prasad yadav was railway minister later.
i ask the pdf members... why didn't nato invade india in 2002 because real massacre had happened against muslims in gujarat, organized and helped by the state government there... nato invaded libya and syria on fake charges of human rights violations... why is nato and usa government shaking hands with modi when he should have been tried in the international criminal court...
@Jungibaaz @Horus @WebMaster
Last edited:
