And still everyday whether it's your steel mills, to water, to IT to movies, all issues point towards India. Right?
Where did I say that?
Yes, that's a long term impact, and it can be done even without a terrorist attack. For example, a FATF blacklist can be just the start of problems for Pakistan. But Pakistan can rely on friends from China and the GCC to protect Pakistan anyway. The effect of sanctions on Pakistan is not as impactful as you believe it can be.
China and the GCC will not be able to provide significant cover to Pakistan in case of a full on sanctions onslaught led by the US. Iran has stumbled along despite US sanctions because of oil revenues and a higher socio-economic starting point. Similar US sanctions against Pakistan would be devastating - which is why staving off potential US sanctions is a far bigger threat than Bhensa's bluster and hot air.
But if the Pindi boys push this govt to beyond a certain extent, Pakistan will cease to exist. That's how much of a danger a hawkish govt is to Pakistan.
The Pindi Boys will push whatever they need to push to the extent needed to safeguard Pakistan's interests. The ranting and raving of Bhensa has no impact, but you can choose to believe what you wish.
LOL
Negative rating for writing "very nice"
As I pointed out already, it's for the use of sarcastic one liners multiple times in response to a genuine question.
Stop wasting your time. Understand that the so called 'Surgical Strikes' never took place. Just like in Kargil, Pakistan Army was never involved. Pakistan Army has said it, that is enough!
And we all know how that panned out.
Bad analogy - the 'event' of the Kargil conflict was never denied. What was, initially, denied was the extent of Pakistani military involvement in the initial taking of military heights.
In the case of the so called 'surgical strikes', there simply is no evidence that strikes along the lines claimed by India occurred. The PA took local and foreign journalists to the alleged sites and there was no evidence to support Indian claims.
Remember what I said about echo chamber?
Absolutely, but throwing out such insults does not lend itself to civil debate.
I don't need to read yet another Indian post about 'Pakistanis are fed XYZ from their military, live in an echo chamber, blah, blah, blah'. Most of us already get it: a majority of you internet Indians have a very low opinion about Pakistanis, and the feeling is mutual. So if we've gotten all those insults out of the way, next time provide us with an actual counter argument.
However, choosing the more positive, powerful word like deterrence when it comes to Pakistan and tending to use words like lacks capability, indecisiveness when talking about India means there is only one agenda.
Dear god, this is what occurs when you choose to cherry pick some words and ignore the context of the comments & discussion. This entire thread was started with the premise that Pakistan's 'deterrence' was going to be nullified by the QRSAM system, so of course I'm going to approach it from the perspective of 'Pakistani deterrence'.