How HQ-9 against the JASSM-ER !

[zon95]

Death from the sky.

I have heard the HQ-9 radar and passive sensors can shoot down F22 or F35, but both F22 and F35 weapons to destroy the AA system efficiency.It's JASSM-ER.

The specifications

Length: 4.27 m
Wingspan: 2.4 m
Weight: 1020 kg
Speed​​: subsonic
Range: 370 km or more
Propulsion system: Teledyne CAE J402-CA-100 turbojet; thrust 3.0 kN (680 lb).
Warhead: the first bullet WDU-42 / B, 450 kg

improvements

The U.S. Air Force is focusing on implementing many variations from the AGM-158 JASSM. They outlined a number of options such as improvements or warhead fitted with a new engine to improve the range of about 1,000 kilometers (600 miles).

JASSM-Extended Range (JASSM-ER) is known as AGM-158B, was born in 2002. It is used more efficient engine with large fuel tank, frame the same plane, larger wingspan AGM-158. JASSM-ER has a range of about 500 miles (930 km), than JASSM (370 km). First test was on 18-5-2006, B-1B Lancer aircraft dropping at White Sand Missile Range in the capital Mexico City.

AA:

HQ-9 detection range 200 km.

YLC-20 passive sensor

Although Type 305 radars are effective against stealthy targets such as F-22 or F-35, full stealth target such as B-2 is difficult to detect. YLC-20 passive radar was conceptually based on KRTP-91 Tamara passive sensor, incorporating experience obtained from documentation acquired during the abortive attempt to procure six Czech VERA passive sensors. YLC-20 passive radar was first revealed in 2006.
DWL002 passive sensor

DWL002 passive radar is the development of earlier YLC-20, incorporating Kolchuga passive sensor, four of which were sold to China.[11] Like its predecessor YLC-20, DWL002 is also developed by China Electronics Technology Corp. (CETC).

FK-1000 clone Panstir-S1 Made in China (I have not heard much about it): equipped with radar, eight air defense missile has a range of 10km and two 30mm automatic flak range of 4km with about 1,900 rounds. Radar AESA

 

[Kompromat]

Chinese are developing something even more meaner and deadlier.

HQ-19 (S-400) (China) - Jane's Strategic Weapon Systems

China Missile Test Has Ominous Implications | Defense News | defensenews.com

 

[j20blackdragon]

Death from the sky.

How Vietnam against the CM-400AKG !

 

[hk299792458]

Chinese are developing something even more meaner and deadlier.

HQ-19 (S-400) (China) - Jane's Strategic Weapon Systems

China Missile Test Has Ominous Implications | Defense News | defensenews.com

Jane's clearly made mistake - HQ-19 ≠ S-400, the 180 side thrust burners are positionned far away from the center of gravity of HQ-19 (more similar of PAC-3) whereas the 24 side thrust rockets of 9M96E2 are around the center of gravity as European Aster.

2 different ways to obtain manoeuvrability, 2 different concepts, 2 different systems...

By the way -

DN-1 ~ GBI
HQ-19 ~ THAAD
HQ-26 ~ SM-3
HQ-29 ~ PAC-3

Moreover, HQ-9B and HQ-16B (and maybe HQ-16G as well) have both limited ABM capability.

Just to finish, a 400km effective range anti-radiation ground-air mixed ramjet missile, HQ-8, has been revealed.

 

[Luftwaffe]

2 different ways to obtain manoeuvrability, 2 different concepts, 2 different systems...

Just to finish, a 400km effective range anti-radiation ground-air mixed ramjet missile, HQ-8, has been revealed.

Are you suggesting HQ-19 is more or less closer to S-500?

 

[cnleio]

See here, China HQ-9 anti-aircraft missile launch and destroy coming enemy's missile
Keep following Leio's PLA Photo thread,ths.

 

[cnleio]

I have heard the HQ-9 radar and passive sensors can shoot down F22 or F35

Where did u hear that? No WAR, No Shoot, No PROVE.

 

[Protocol man]

Jane's clearly made mistake - HQ-19 ≠ S-400, the 180 side thrust burners are positionned far away from the center of gravity of HQ-19 (more similar of PAC-3) whereas the 24 side thrust rockets of 9M96E2 are around the center of gravity as European Aster.

2 different ways to obtain manoeuvrability, 2 different concepts, 2 different systems...

By the way -

DN-1 ~ GBI
HQ-19 ~ THAAD
HQ-26 ~ SM-3
HQ-29 ~ PAC-3

Moreover, HQ-9B and HQ-16B (and maybe HQ-16G as well) have both limited ABM capability.

Just to finish, a 400km effective range anti-radiation ground-air mixed ramjet missile, HQ-8, has been revealed.

Where did you hear about DN-1, HQ-19, HQ-26 and HQ-29?

 

[zon95]

How Vietnam against the CM-400AKG !



Oh no, my assumption, the U.S. will sell to the Philippines to attack China

 

[zon95]

See here, China HQ-9 anti-aircraft missile launch and destroy coming enemy's missile
Keep following Leio's PLA Photo thread,ths.

Thanks for the contribution, but this is the JASSM-ER, not missile made ​​by China

 

[cnleio]

Thanks for the contribution, but this is the JASSM-ER, not missile made ​​by China

LOL, a basic question which one is faster in flight a ballistic missile ? a air-to-ground missile ? or a cruise missile like JASSM-ER ?
I remember the JASSM-ER flight still a speed of 0.72 Mach,subsonic cruise missile. So if HQ-9 can build anti-ballistic missle system and destroy a high-speed missile, why not hit a low-speed target?
Two JASSM - ER systems pass successful test

While the first JASSM-ER missile was released from an altitude of 13,000 feet and a speed of 0.72 Mach, the second missile was released from 30,000 feet at 0.88 Mach, the company said

Did u know today most anti-ship missiles like America RGM-84A or Tomahawk cruise missile
still is subsonic missile only 0.75-0.88 Mach, and how we defense our warships? Just CIWS or Sea-RAM. Does the JASSM-ER is one super-sonic cruise missile or speed faster than a ballistic missle, r u sure?

 

[cirr]

HQ-9B is far superior to its predecessor shown here.

HQ-19 and HQ-26 rule。

The new anti-radiation missile HQ-8, with its advanced hybrid ramjet technology and 400km plus strike range，renders the US's and India's AWACS nothing but sitting ducks。

The new HQ-16B and HQ-16G are also major upgrades of the existing HQ-16A and HHQ-16，respectively。

 

[Arzamas 16]

Are you suggesting HQ-19 is more or less closer to S-500?

By closer you mean having 200 Km less range?

Anyhow more info on S-500 will revealed on MAKS 2013.

 

[conworldus]

By closer you mean having 200 Km less range?

Anyhow more info on S-500 will revealed on MAKS 2013.

Longer range usually reduces the accuracy. The definition of the range is rather relative unless we know the level of accuracy at a given range. I don't have any data on the S-500.

The thing with the Russian anti-air missile family is that nothing above S-300 has ever seen any combat action.

Right now I think any comparison of Hq-19 and Russians SAMs are just pointless arguments.

 

[zon95]

LOL, a basic question which one is faster in flight a ballistic missile ? a air-to-ground missile ? or a cruise missile like JASSM-ER ?
I remember the JASSM-ER flight still a speed of 0.72 Mach,subsonic cruise missile. So if HQ-9 can build anti-ballistic missle system and destroy a high-speed missile, why not hit a low-speed target?
Two JASSM - ER systems pass successful test


Did u know today most anti-ship missiles like America RGM-84A or Tomahawk cruise missile
still is subsonic missile only 0.75-0.88 Mach, and how we defense our warships? Just CIWS or Sea-RAM. Does the JASSM-ER is one super-sonic cruise missile or speed faster than a ballistic missle, r u sure?

Hey hey ! look

1 is subsonic missile can fly at a lower altitude supersonic missiles so the maximum range of the radar can detect missile subsonic will be lower than the detection range supersonic missile (due to limited roadhorizon: pudency: do not know, google offline)
2 is a subsonic missile with lower velocities should not have to worry too much about the temperature => covered the RAM reduce rcs easier, shape can also be optimized for stealth: SOGOOD:
3 subsonic missile is usually smaller than supersonic missile (range) a lot so she can carry more aircraft than
4 And JASSM-ER missile is stealth