khansaheeb
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2008
- Messages
- 17,009
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Who cares , it proved it's worth in Feb 2020.I don't know man, it just looks ugly!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who cares , it proved it's worth in Feb 2020.I don't know man, it just looks ugly!
2019* ---- as a STOW delivery platform and keeping them mirages2k5 at bay.Who cares , it proved it's worth in Feb 2020.
2019* ---- as a STOW delivery platform and keeping them mirages2k5 at bay.
2 Iranian UAV shot down near the border by jf-17.
@Mirage Battle Commander is known to be exaggerated PAF Achievements of 27 FAB 2019, He also claimed that we shot down not 1 MKI but 3 MKI, and which is not backup by solid proofs by @Mirage Battle CommanderI’m aware of one Iranian UAV shoot down. When was the 2nd one?
That's what she said about you?I don't know man, it just looks ugly!
We had zero crash because of accident last year.
And how many IAF jets crashed in 2014-2018??? please tell us, and not a single J-10B/C crashed in recent years all were old J-10A/S was being crash, and stop your delusional you stupid, even latest F-35 of USAF had been crashed last year so that's means F-35 has also poorly aerodynamically design according to you???8 aircrafts crashed between 2014 and 2018.
It's aerodynamic are poor. Avionics and AESA are bellow average.
It looks ugly because it is poorly aerodynamically design.
Spot the IndianAt least it looks better than JF17, one of the ugliest planes in the world!
And how many IAF jets crashed in 2014-2018??? please tell us, and not a single J-10B/C crashed in recent years all were old J-10A/S was being crash, and stop your delusional you stupid, even latest F-35 of USAF had been crashed last year so that's means F-35 has also poorly aerodynamically design according to you???
What matters is if it looks good in the sky. I think it does. Have you seen a mig 29 on tarmac, but sure are majestic in the skiesAt least it looks better than JF17, one of the ugliest planes in the world!
What makes you say india ripped off Chinese design?Anything not designed or owned by India is a poor aerodynamic design. Doesn’t stop them from ripping off the Chinese design for their AMCA though.
What matters is if it looks good in the sky. I think it does. Have you seen a mig 29 on tarmac, but sure are majestic in the skies
What makes you say india ripped off Chinese design?
Hahaha I agree. Indians are humorousI’m just applying Indian logic here. According to them, the J-31 is a rip off of the F-35 even though it uses two engines and has a clean bottom airframe. The AMCA, however, is:
1) twin engined
2) uses DSI intakes
3) has a clean belly
4) is a medium fighter.
Even the general planform looks like the FC-31 V1 with the uncropped main wings and vertical slabs.
See for yourself.
View attachment 709560
New Recruit
At least it looks better than JF17, one of the ugliest planes in the world!
Dude fighter jets are not being designed and built for anaesthetic/beauty but built upon their missions specifications ,and their lots of examples in past that USAF/USN/VVS (SOVIET AIR FORCE) design/ develop and inducted ugly jets but serve very wellAt least it looks better than JF17, one of the ugliest planes in the world!