How fear of Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa forced Pashtuns to start wearing salwar

[Dark Warrior]

Your great grandmother was not born in 2015,80 years after Hari Singh spanked the durranis.

& he wrote in his book & you believed him? wow that is pretty naive of you isn't it!when clearly a foreginer may not know anything about culture or demographics of the region. besides i never heard of this hari singh dude. and i am sure 99.9% of pakistanis haven't either.

so i am not the confused one you are mate.
Most historians voted the book as one of the best in history of NWFP of the 19th century.

 

[ice_man]

so i am not the confused one you are mate.
Most historians voted the book as one of the best in history of NWFP of the 19th century.

please understand what you are trying to say before your verbal diarrhea you make absoloutely no sense!

 

[Dark Warrior]

& sadly enough this "spanking" is forgotten by history totally! which remembers the invasion of alexander,moghuls & ghanazvi & ghauri.

BUT HARI SINGH is totally forgotten in 80 years of his so called greatnes

That's because your muslim court historians couldn't write how their bosses were kicked in their a$$
Anyways the greatest conqueror according to me is Chengiz Khan and Hulagu Khan for their invincibility.
Hulagu's siege of Baghdad was lovely.

please understand what you are trying to say before your verbal diarrhea you make absoloutely no sense!

You may not have enough knowledge to comprehend scholarly books,so it's useless to argue with you

 

[ice_man]

That's because your muslim court historians couldn't write how their bosses were kicked in their a$$
Anyways the greatest conqueror according to me is Chengiz Khan and Hulagu Khan for their invincibility.
Hulagu's siege of Baghdad was lovely.

yes and yet these historians wrote about MOGHULS which you can't deny, neither can you deny ghaznavi,abadli,ghauri & mohammed bin Qasem.

but your PHAIKO history is only known to you & no one else!

 

[Khan_patriot]

Your great grandmother was born in 2015,80 years after Hari Singh spanked the durranis.

bro you really think that if such a disgrace had occured, she wouldnt or any elder would have rounded up the men and levelled the entire punjab plains because thats the way it was done and thats the way it still is done, prove 100 % without a shadow of a doubt that it is true and i will personally start my ramapge starting from waga and doing what ever i can, better yet through the LOC and getting martyred and, dude most of the Muslims and 99% of the general Pathan boys like me dream of things like this......as for me i already have a probable invasion plan of india whch is purely fictional but given the resources not impossible ...

 

[Mirza Jatt]

the problem with sikhs is they always over exagarete things liek their stories about 40 men vs 10 million or 10 men vs 1 million in no story of theirs do there bnumbers touch 50 and they fight against millions and in the end all die and one runs away & write stories.

the bottom line is INDIAN PUNJABIS are PHAIKOO(as in liars)

I know stroies like these hurt your ego and it is hard for you to acept that a single general and his 400 soldiers was too much for your men of 60,000. sikhs did what they had to do..they capturedd your muslim empire and controlled it for many years despite of a lesser no. deny as much you want, but yo cant change the history.

 

[hotaki]

That's because your muslim court historians couldn't write how their bosses were kicked in their a$$
Anyways the greatest conqueror according to me is Chengiz Khan and Hulagu Khan for their invincibility.
Hulagu's siege of Baghdad was lovely.


You may not have enough knowledge to comprehend scholarly books,so it's useless to argue with you

Hulakus siege of Baghdad was lovely, and what's that got to do with topic on hand and south/central Asia?.

 

[ice_man]

I know stroies like these hurt your ego and it is hard for you to acept that a single general and his 400 soldiers was too much for your men of 60,000. sikhs did what they had to do..they capturedd your muslim empire and controlled it for many years despite of a lesser no. deny as much you want, but yo cant change the history.

ok! if you say so whatever bed time stories makes you sikhs sleep at night. keep them going the PHAIKO stories! like gobind singh and his 30 men vs 10million and gobind escaped and wrote a letter. wonder how he escaped! probably ran away & let his people die.

 

[Dark Warrior]

bro you really think that if such a disgrace had occured, she wouldnt or any elder would have rounded up the men and levelled the entire punjab plains because thats the way it was done and thats the way it still is done, prove 100 % without a shadow of a doubt that it is true and i will personally start my ramapge starting from waga and doing what ever i can, better yet through the LOC and getting martyred and, dude most of the Muslims and 99% of the general Pathan boys like me dream of things like this......as for me i already have a probable invasion plan of india whch is purely fictional but given the resources not impossible ...

yes and yet these historians wrote about MOGHULS which you can't deny, neither can you deny ghaznavi,abadli,ghauri & mohammed bin Qasem.

but your PHAIKO history is only known to you & no one else!

Yawn looks like somebody is taking Madrassa education seriously.

 

[Mirza Jatt]

bold underlined part is your own answer. i ain't going to go google saudi men underwear LOL!

I know you wont because, your claim was bogus...I still dont know how a saudi underwear looks like..lol..but you claim over claim that a dhoti is similar to saudis underwear made me think that may be dhoti would look like a suaid underwear ...and just like dhoti, it would be a plain peice of cloth..my only mistake was that i was expecting a decent debate with proofs and i induldged in decent conversation...or else anyone could claim a pakistani shalwar is like an Indian underwear and then refuse to prove his point. anyways.

 

[Roybot]

 

[Mirza Jatt]

ok! if you say so whatever bed time stories makes you sikhs sleep at night. keep them going the PHAIKO stories! like gobind singh and his 30 men vs 10million and gobind escaped and wrote a letter. wonder how he escaped! probably ran away & let his people die.

no one said 30 men vs 10 million..now you are putting words in my mouth....your exxaggeration of our stories prove that you want them to be portrayed in a manner that it looks silly. But as i said...I know what sikhs did..you dont want know, then am not going to force you..we do not belive in prtraying ourselves as martial race, superior calss..purest of purest religion..blah blah balha....if we do that it will hurt us more when we get defeated.... every race sees defeats and wins..even we sikhs faced defeats..and admit it....unlik you who are made to belive since childhood that they are the best can never be defeated..in short, not human beings but some super human... its not just a bed time story that sikhs ruled your muslim empire..although its your own choice if you want to skip the pges and read only what suits you.

 

[ice_man]

Nopes. you are confusing between dhoti and saudis clothes....I dont know what saudis's dress is known but hats more like a Lungi for us than a dhoti...a dhoti is different..although its a simple plain cloth just liek saudis' it is not worn that way..its a worn by wrapping in a particular manner that gives it a particular shape..which i much different than what saudis wear. lemme try to give you an example...

this is a dhoti
http://withfriendship.com/images/i/43600/Dhoti-wallpaper.jpg

YOU stated this and now you deny your own claims. the bold parts are self explainatory! its like saying a bra is a bra but it is worn differently and hence is not a bra!

 

[Roybot]

YOU stated this and now you deny your own claims. the bold parts are self explainatory! its like saying a bra is a bra but it is worn differently and hence is not a bra!

What are you on about? Dhoti looks like what you guys wear on Hajj. Is that the Saudi underwear you are referring too?

 

[Mirza Jatt]

YOU stated this and now you deny your own claims. the bold parts are self explainatory! its like saying a bra is a bra but it is worn differently and hence is not a bra!

your posts have started to appear kiddish..whan instead of proving your own point yourself..you depend on what the other is saying.

yes I did say a dhoti is same in appearance as saudis dress...but thats because I was trusting upon you..who claimed that a saudi underwear is like a dhoti. I never seen a saudi underwear...but since you started the claim...you must prove it how it is..i showed you how a dhoti looks..now you show me how a saudi undewear look...if they are similar..i would accept that i was wrong and you are right...but here you are supporting your claims by being dependent on my lines..lol

its like clapping in front of a person's face and when the person blinks...you start claiming that you scared the person.lol

so if you cant prove how a saudi underwear looks like ..please dont waste my time.