johnny boy
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 375
- Reaction score
- 0
ha ha ha he he he ................rupee news gives me chill down da spine.........ooooooooo india is failed lol!!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ares you will the most retarded guy in the whole world, if you still believe india had any success in afghan, 'to build afghanistan and india relations', and a dumb retarded might think that instead of winning afghani heart, spreading terrorism into the neighbourhood through afghanistan is a sucessful thing
india wanted to make balochistan separate state, they armed balochis, but the ommon patriotic baloch fought back, your mission is a dimb failure, we atleast provoked khalistan much better, but you did nothing
instead of indian consulate along pak afghan border, you had made those 15 in afghanistan heart and addressed promisingly to afghans, you would have brought afghans closer, but you used afghanistan for your purpose
adios !
well all lies !!!!!
U pakistanis cant spare even a dollar for poor brave afghans !!!
So u dont dare talk bout it !!!
If u dont wannna appreciate the help done by india , dont comment cheaply bout it !!!!
First and foremost, please get you facts straight! ''Hindu Kush' does not mean 'Hindu Killer'!! The word "Koh" or "Kuh" means mountain in many of the local languages.there is little to show for it in real terms in the Hindu Kush mountains (Hindu Killer).
1. In Uzbek language the words "Hindu Kush" mean "Kill Hindus".
2. In good old days the Central Asian tribes used to foray across the Hindu Kush seasonally, and descend upon the Indus valley to loot. That is how this name has evolved. Remember, to them a Hindu at that time meant a person belonging to Hindustan or Hind.
Ya we had , but ur pakistan didnt have one (as accepted by u)We would have spent a dollar, if we had one.
ares you will the most retarded guy in the whole world, if you still believe india had any success in afghan, 'to build afghanistan and india relations', and a dumb retarded might think that instead of winning afghani heart, spreading terrorism into the neighbourhood through afghanistan is a sucessful thing
india wanted to make balochistan separate state, they armed balochis, but the ommon patriotic baloch fought back, your mission is a dimb failure, we atleast provoked khalistan much better, but you did nothing
instead of indian consulate along pak afghan border, you had made those 15 in afghanistan heart and addressed promisingly to afghans, you would have brought afghans closer, but you used afghanistan for your purpose
adios !
Thanks for the admission. Khalistan supporters, look who has a selfless agenda.
But to gain upperhand in Afghanistan Pakistan needs to gain upper hand in Waziristan(it's own territory).My understanding is that IF Americans leave Afghanistan today--or even by 2014--Pakistan is likely to get the upper hand. Geography, ethnic, religious, economic ties are much stronger for Pakistan, even though a lot of Afghans blame Pakistan for their problems.
But even if Pakistan is able to achieve the status of pre 9/11 it would still be a problem. The proxy wars will continue between various regional powers and so Afghans will suffer.
I'd say leave the Afghans alone! And that applies to all regional powers. Let the Afghans be back to pre 1974 era and let them evolve on their own pace. I say pre 1974 because, in my opinion, the political left/right of Afghanistan started on a collision course sometime in mid 70s, backed by Americans and Soviets even that early. The results have been disastrous.