How Could the Human Body Not Have An Intelligent Designer?

[sreekimpact]

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

Emergent complexity from simple interaction forces is a fascinating phenomenon in statistical physics. There's nothing wierd or intelligent about it.

Take a soap molecule, with an ionic phosphate group attached to a hydrocarbon tail. it dissolves in water. put more in, and they spontaneously arrange in membranes at the surface. put even more, they arrange into a sphere. why? because the solvation of the hydrocarbon tail requires a local entropy decrease in the water due to its nonpolar character, but the arrangement into more complex shapes rather than a solution lowers the overall energy.

Take a fine powder of a block copolymer with half the chain soluble in water (like PEG) and the other half not (like PE). It's just jumbled chains. Solvate them in water though, and they will spontaneously phase separate into water soluble polymer on the outside and non-soluble on the inside.

Life is just the result of 3 billion years of statistical physics.

 

[InFn-0]

Emergent complexity from simple interaction forces is a fascinating phenomenon in statistical physics. There's nothing wierd or intelligent about it.

Take a soap molecule, with an ionic phosphate group attached to a hydrocarbon tail. it dissolves in water. put more in, and they spontaneously arrange in membranes at the surface. put even more, they arrange into a sphere. why? because the solvation of the hydrocarbon tail requires a local entropy decrease in the water due to its nonpolar character, but the arrangement into more complex shapes rather than a solution lowers the overall energy.

Take a fine powder of a block copolymer with half the chain soluble in water (like PEG) and the other half not (like PE). It's just jumbled chains. Solvate them in water though, and they will spontaneously phase separate into water soluble polymer on the outside and non-soluble on the inside.

Life is just the result of 3 billion years of statistical physics.

How would you explain the impossible probabilities associated with the theory of evolution by natural selection?

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

How would you explain the impossible probabilities associated with the theory of evolution by natural selection?

we think earth is special, because we live here. but thats not the case. there are other earth-like planets out there. we've also had 3 billion years. repeat the same conditions 3 billion times, and give each 3 billion years to run, and one of them will succeed.

also, natural selection is seen to work as we speak. in the 1940's, penicilin was the hot sh!t because it was like a magical silver bullet that killed bacteria like nothing. today it is a joke because bacteria have evolved in the past 70 years to degrade penicilin. note that this is not a single bacterium that's changing its cells. a single bacterium lasts for about 2 hours before being eaten.

i'm not going to go into the philosophy of the evolution theory, just pointing out that it exists and has been seen in a single human lifetime.

if bacteria can do this in 70 years, is it a big stretch to say that big animals can in the span of millions?

the lottery also has impossible probabilities but someone will win, right?

 

[InFn-0]

we think earth is special, because we live here. but thats not the case. there are other earth-like planets out there. we've also had 3 billion years. repeat the same conditions 3 billion times, and give each 3 billion years to run, and one of them will succeed.

also, natural selection is seen to work as we speak. in the 1940's, penicilin was the hot sh!t because it was like a magical silver bullet that killed bacteria like nothing. today it is a joke because bacteria have evolved in the past 70 years to degrade penicilin. note that this is not a single bacterium that's changing its cells. a single bacterium lasts for about 2 hours before being eaten.

i'm not going to go into the philosophy of the evolution theory, just pointing out that it exists and has been seen in a single human lifetime.

if bacteria can do this in 70 years, is it a big stretch to say that big animals can in the span of millions?

the lottery also has impossible probabilities but someone will win, right?

Well people who believe in the Intelligent Design theory also believe evolution takes place due to natural selection but in a limited level. Meaning, small scale changes are possible, but large scale changes are not possible by natural selection. Also, genetic study of the human gene has come to the conclusion that evolving from ape gene to human gene is not possible. Then you take into account the DNA thing, DNA is like the coding of the species, there is no way it could have happened by natural selection, even the evolutionary scientists accept it, but what they want to say that with due time they will find the answer to it (?). And about this one i am not so sure but somewhere i read that there is no fossil proof of evolution meaning that evolution was supposed to happen by stages say 1,2,3,4,5 but we only have fossil of stage 1 and then directly stage 5, which is not really possible by the current theory of evolution.

And regarding the 3 billion years thing, the statistical probabilities are so crazy that each stage of human evolution is so unlikely that the sun would have to burn itself many times over by the time one stage was completed.

 

[katli]

we think earth is special, because we live here. but thats not the case. there are other earth-like planets out there. we've also had 3 billion years. repeat the same conditions 3 billion times, and give each 3 billion years to run, and one of them will succeed.

also, natural selection is seen to work as we speak. in the 1940's, penicilin was the hot sh!t because it was like a magical silver bullet that killed bacteria like nothing. today it is a joke because bacteria have evolved in the past 70 years to degrade penicilin. note that this is not a single bacterium that's changing its cells. a single bacterium lasts for about 2 hours before being eaten.

i'm not going to go into the philosophy of the evolution theory, just pointing out that it exists and has been seen in a single human lifetime.

if bacteria can do this in 70 years, is it a big stretch to say that big animals can in the span of millions?

the lottery also has impossible probabilities but someone will win, right?

appreciate you trying to drill some sense into these islamics' heads who refuse to believe in science and want proof, but accept that god created earth without any proof saying its faith.

 

[Gold1010]

Damn so when we die its all over!

What id do to go back in time and see the dinosaurs though..