From the Wikipedia which in turn cites a book and from a forum. My sources are better than sources you cited in jour post 49. US support for Saddam Hussein is a well known fact:
On the other hand, you still have no answer the question, a forum here, a video there, I can show you a picture of UN Sectary General shake hand with Saddam Hussein when he was awarded the UNESCO award for improving the living standards in Iraq, what does that even mean? Does that mean UN support Iraq Genocide Kurds?
I never denied US help Iraq, like the 4 Billions Agriculture Grant and Help them build the Nuclear Power Plant, you still have not show me one solid proof US sold arms directly to Iraq prior to Gulf War
I answered to all your 4 questions.
You did not even answer one.
Read the response above, it's the same period between 80s to 90s.
They didn't build China up. They invested in China, that's all. They continued to invest even when China had bad relations with US after 1989. Russia currently had very bad relations with US empire and guess what. Companies from other countries (eg. Mercedes, Huawei) couninue to invest in Russia.
lol giving them money and technology and selling them weapon is not "Building" a country up? Then US was not building up Israel, Georgia (The country, not the US states) and Ukraine I guess.
And if it is as you said, Russia is already sunsetting in 1980s, how do they build China up?
The very fact that you put Russia in in itself say how much you know Asian Politics, China detracted with Russia since early 1970 after Russia and China have the border dispute in 1969, China and Soviet Union did not sign the Border Agreement until 1991. I am not sure if America was a friend of China in 1989, but SU is definitely not a fan of China in the 70s and 80s.
You have a slave mentality. You probably think that the Sun would stop shining and the Earth would stop moving if US regime order so. US regime imposed several rounds of sanctions against Russia since Russia's reunification with Crimea in 2014. US sanctions were meant to cripple Russia. US terrorist Obama boasted how "Russia is isolated, with its economy in tatters", other US terrorist McCain boasted how "Russia is a gas station masquerading as a country". Five years has passed and Russia is doing OK.
And you know nothing about Far East Politics
To start, you don't even know China is at Conflict with Russia during the late 60s to Early 90s, or else how and why US will in turn try to please China? You need to learn something about Vietnam war but rather listen to people talk about it.
But meh, what did I expect in a pole? Do you even read any Far East Language?
Secondly, Japan, Germany and French are all with US money. And to say Japan help China itself is an absurd idea.
And then I have absolutely no idea why you would put 2014 sanction of Russia here, that have no relation to what we are talking about. As I said, Russia and China was not buddy back then.
US actions were not the only reason why Soviet Union fall, but US supported this. There were people predicting the fall of the Soviet Union before 1989. Also Gorbatchev sought good relations with USA, that's why in 1989 US regime no longer needen China as counterbalance to the Soviet Union.
US seek counterbalance before 1989, do you even know when is US normalise relationship with China? 1971. If they cannot predict USSR fall in 1971, they could not predict USSR fall in 1991.
Gorbachev never seek good intention to the US, I don't even know how or why anyone would say that. You say that only because it will make your argument work better, in fact, Ronald Regan's famously declare they (The American) will need to end the Cold War in the 1990s.
The EU ? What are you talking about ? You have a problem with even basic facts. The EU was created in 1992. There was no EU before 1992.
And what do you mean by "Tiananmen Square happened" ? AFAIK Tiananmen Square was build in 1651.
Are you really Pole? Or live in Europe? You sure you are not from some third world Eastern Europe shithole?
The Formation of EU goes back to 1958 when the first mention of the term European Union were signed on the official document of TREATY ON THE FUNCTIONING OF THE
EUROPEAN UNION (Treaty of Rome)
https://lexparency.org/eu/TFEU/TOC/EN/latest/
Okay, I will give you that maybe I should call European Union, not EU, but well, the EU, as we know now, is created in 1993 (not 1992, they sign the Maastricht Treaty in 1992, but that was not in effect until 1993.) However, Maastricht Treaty is seen only as enhanced intergration of European Union, not as a formation of European Union, that was already done when the core Europe Nation sign The Treaty of Rome (otherwise known as Treaty on the functioning of the European Union) Which define the concept of constiation of a single Europe Market, and a Single European Community called European Economic Communities. While the Treaty on Euiropean Union (1992) further Enhance the Administration of Single Market (by using Euro and replacing individual currency) and also put further into aspect of collective defence (The Formation of EU Battle Group) and the movement between different EU member,
European Union exist BEFORE 1993, but that is not the same European Union we have today. So unless you can point to me where my information got wrong, I can still say European Union in the 80s, 90s.
How come a person of Asian backgorund is giving a EU lecture to a Pole? Maybe a trip to Brussel (Which I did take 2 years ago) you will learn more about EU than an Asian Student? I don't know, but maybe it won't help you?
