What's new

How China and Pakistan Are Beating India in the New Great Game

Ayyoo.... Article is one sided.. Yes recently our relation with Af not good as was earlier.. the same goes for China we're gaining more influence in Sri lanka , BD, Nepal, Myanmar, and island nations.. not to mention Vietnam and Japan..

And Don't worry... oNce the Port in Iran gets completed and more trade takes back the influence aould come back... also Pakistanis should be remembered.. you've not achieved anything big in Afganistan... remember what President of Af said this week about Pakistan

Exactly.

The article is reather biased.

If one observes, he will see Look East Policy is beoming a success and as of now Pakistan is not in position to challange India on its own.
 
. .
很奇怪印度媒体和很多国民热衷于中国威胁论,这本事西方丑化中国国际形象和向本国政府索要更多军费的借口,现在印度显然对此更感兴趣。那这么做对自己有什么好处呢?无非是给自己树立一个强大的自己战胜不了的敌人,除此之外什么也得不到。如果说要对付印度,那么无需巴基斯坦,中国自己能解决掉,62年可以打垮印度,今天更加不是问题,问题就在于,中国为什么要这么干?印度媒体和本国的某些自以为是的国民总喜欢妖魔化中国,可是至今你们活的好好的,难道就不知道反省自己的所作所为吗?还是说你们就是靠炒作中国威胁论过日子的?

First of all... the source is not India.. anf Yes u can't just handle India alone while handling Japan, Us, Vietnam and other SCS countries.. that's why You chose Pakistan an Arch Enemy of India.. be wise its not 62 and Indian army is not in 62s standards and China is also not the same standards of 62 but still you can't defeat India the same applies for India in a full fledged war.

First you need to understand one thing very clearly... HISTORY NEVER DIES... whatever happened in 62 will be the reason for India to rise an eyebrow agianst China... Why do you think Pakistanis keep on Whining about Indian Threat???

You complain about INdian Media demonizing China but you don't bother to look at what Chinese News papers and Chinese leaders demonize Japan and Pakistani news papers and leaders say crap about India???
 
. . . . . .
I thought Pakistan was isolated as per Indian media
 
.
Ashraf Ghani slams Pakistan for waging ‘undeclared war’ | The Indian Express

:rofl:

Center for the National Interest - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Like I said before....UK's Intel supported and pushed for Ghani to be installed in power of Afghanistan. We can conclude a few things...either the UK doesn't give a f-k which is quite plausible... or.....they still control the strings of the puppet. The question we should all be asking is what does the UK gain from this?

Everybody wants a piece or some sort of play in Afghanistan. Maybe they don't wish for India to gain a hand in the already crowded list or perhaps they just feel Pak would be easier to work with, read more subservient in lieu of payments or other support.

Anyway, its not like British are friends of India. Their stance on Kashmir alone is enough.
 
.
Ashraf Ghani slams Pakistan for waging ‘undeclared war’ | The Indian Express

:rofl:



Everybody wants a piece or some sort of play in Afghanistan. Maybe they don't wish for India to gain a hand in the already crowded list or perhaps they just feel Pak would be easier to work with, read more subservient in lieu of payments or other support.

Anyway, its not like British are friends of India. Their stance on Kashmir alone is enough.

British are too internally focused. They don't give a fcuk about whats happening in outside world. Just look at their elections man. No one uttered a word about foreign policy. They are continuously cutting their defense spending. I bet in a couple of years they would loose all heft and would be confined to Europe. Sad state of affairs for the mightiest empires in History of Mankind really
 
.
British are too internally focused. They don't give a fcuk about whats happening in outside world. Just look at their elections man. No one uttered a word about foreign policy. They are continuously cutting their defense spending. I bet in a couple of years they would loose all heft and would be confined to Europe. Sad state of affairs for the mightiest empires in History of Mankind really

British people true, not their governments and intel agencies. They are still the second largest defense spenders in NATO and still number one lieutenant of US. If Us were to go war again, the British would follow despite public opinion.

Politicians don't speak on stuff the public has no interest in. That does not mean the governments have no interest.
 
.
British people true, not their governments and intel agencies. They are still the second largest defense spenders in NATO and still number one lieutenant of US. If Us were to go war again, the British would follow despite public opinion.

Politicians don't speak on stuff the public has no interest in. That does not mean the governments have no interest.
We have seen statements on SCS from all major US allies like Aus, Japan, Canada even Germany and France the only exception in UK.

Its said silence speaks more eloquently than rhetoric
 
.
We have seen statements on SCS from all major US allies like Aus, Japan, Canada even Germany and France the only exception in UK.

Its said silence speaks more eloquently than rhetoric

We are talking about Afghanistan. Who sent troops there aside from US? It sure wasn't Japan.

UK foreign scope might be more limited, but middle east is still important to them. Maybe, SCS does not.
 
.
We are talking about Afghanistan. Who sent troops there aside from US? It sure wasn't Japan.

UK foreign scope might be more limited, but middle east is still important to them. Maybe, SCS does not.

I took the example of declining British interest in SCS because its the only major active flash point. UK is absent in Iraq and Syria as well where fight against ISIS is going on. As far as i can recall French and USA have provided air support not sure about UK though
 
.
Back
Top Bottom