The good old days of rising Bangla tiger:
Here we see how Bangladeshi labour struggles to compete with Indian specialisation and Vietnamese linear production.
https://www.just-style.com/comment/a-tale-of-three-countries-vietnam-india-bangladesh_id131188.aspx
@Nilgiri @gslv mk3
What we have saying so far is turning out to be truth on ground.
The rise of Bangladesh's garment export industry has been nothing less than spectacular. Until recently it appeared that nothing could stop Bangladesh: not the Tazreen fire, not the Rana Plaza building collapse, not terrible working conditions – and certainly not the lowest wage rates in Asia. It was as if US and EU importers were addicted to made-in-Bangladesh garments and nothing could stop the need to buy. By 2015 Bangladesh garment exports were second only to China.
Here we see how Bangladeshi labour struggles to compete with Indian specialisation and Vietnamese linear production.
If indeed made-in-Bangladesh garments have become less competitive, I suggest the gap between Bangladesh and its competitors is not because Bangladesh has moved backwards, but rather that its competitors have moved forward.
Most of us recognise that the global garment industry is operating in a technological world where, in order to compete, factories require first-class engineers to increase productivity and specialists to enable them to provide important services.
For example, India faces many of the same problems as Bangladesh, but Indian garment factories have become service providers. In this regard, India has the best product development facilities in Asia. Whatever India's other problems, the importer knows the made-in-India product will have design integrity – the garment will look like the sample and the sample will look like the designer's original sketch. As a result, India has become the place to make complex fashion, and for this service alone the importer will pay a premium price.
Vietnam has indeed become a second China. The country has developed first-class education and training facilities turning out excellent managers and merchandisers. It is moving ahead to develop speed-to-market. Vietnam has become a leader in sustainable production. In short Vietnam has become one of the easiest places in which to work. The factories understand customer needs and have developed the facilities to meet those needs.
Against this, what does Bangladesh offer? Cheap overworked labour!
The problem is not moral. Bangladesh has the same problems as any failing company and/or industry: poor management.
Forcing a sewer to work 14 hours per day, 7 days per week does not make sense. Productivity falls. Quality falls. Worker attrition rises.
If you want your factory to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week that is not a problem. Capital-intensive industries such as spinning work 24-7. The answer is simple: three 10-hour shifts. Production rises. Productivity rises. Quality levels remain high.
Many operations must per-force operate 24-7: hospitals, police and fire departments, just to name a few. Their answer is a simple and well established 4x4x4 in which four teams each work a 12-hour shift, four days a week. These operations would fall apart if they forced their staff to work in Bangladesh-type conditions.
Today, we have the means to meet the needs of industry reasonably, safely and without losing productivity, reducing quality or reliability. If Bangladesh management brought in qualified engineers they could move from excessive overtime to reasonable working hours, increase productivity and wages and move into the 21st century.
https://www.just-style.com/comment/a-tale-of-three-countries-vietnam-india-bangladesh_id131188.aspx
@Nilgiri @gslv mk3
What we have saying so far is turning out to be truth on ground.