How a 4-Hour Battle Between Russian Mercenaries and U.S. Commandos Unfolded in Syria

[Imad.Khan]

They are there to fight ISIS, based on UNSC resolution 2249.
That is obviously annoying to a lot of Islamists.

Great cover story, well this incident took place in Feb of 2018. By that time ISIS was already cleared from all the areas surrounding

Here is the map of ISIS territory. Even in the article it says they were there to control the oil fields.

Obviously this is just a propaganda by the invading crusaders.

 

[SALMAN F]

500 armed with tanks howitzers couldn't harm 40 soldiers...
OK !

Add to that many of them might be ex special forces

 

[Yaseen1]

u.s air force is strongest in world having 2500 f35 jets which are almost equal to total jets of all types in russia airforce

 

[newb3e]

All of us have watched RAMBO etc so we know the americans are immortal and GODs of the battlefield so there was no need to start such a thread for registering and seeking acknowledgement of the PDF members since its as true as day light that nobody, no arm/weapon or technology can harm americans.

haha exactly its like americans never fking die (not that i wish death upon anyone except zionist bastards) but 40 against 500 and zero american casualty not even one freaking blood scrath its really amazing!!

 

[Osiris]

500 armed with tanks howitzers couldn't harm 40 soldiers...
OK !

Don't you remember Battle of Longewala from your own history, How 4 Indian Hunter aircrafts and company 110 soldiers, defeated , Pakistani Brigade of 2000 soldier and tank regiment of 48 tanks, with only 4 Indian soldier getting KIA.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

Great cover story, well this incident took place in Feb of 2018. By that time ISIS was already cleared from all the areas surrounding

Here is the map of ISIS territory. Even in the article it says they were there to control the oil fields.

Obviously this is just a propaganda by the invading crusaders.

Selective reading does not help Your argument when others can read the rest.
The map is not in conflict with the article anyway.

”In the days leading up to the attack, and on opposite sides of the Euphrates River, Russia and the United States were backing separate offensives against the Islamic State in Syria’s oil-rich Deir al-Zour Province, which borders Iraq.”

 

[Vapnope]

Don't you remember Battle of Longewala from your own history, How 4 Indian Hunter aircrafts and company 110 soldiers, defeated , Pakistani Brigade of 2000 soldier and tank regiment of 48 tanks, with only 4 Indian soldier getting KIA.

Last i read from an Indian poster was 3000 Pakistani soldiers and No Indian KIA, I don't know who are these 4 gentlemen who are considered dead now?

 

[Osiris]

Last i read from an Indian poster was 3000 Pakistani soldiers and No Indian KIA, I don't know who are these 4 gentlemen who are considered dead now?

You don't need, to take my word for it, pick up any, neutral source and read it.

Battle of Longewala, should make, aptly clear, on how much difference, having air support, makes to battle on the ground.

 

[ARMalik]

Yea sure .....reminds me of the Hollywood's dick hea.d Rambo who could kill hundreds. But fortunately for Mankind, fantasy land Bullshi.t does not apply to the real world situations where characters like Rambo would be skinned alive and then fed to pigs.

 

[Vapnope]

You don't need, to take my word for it, pick up any, neutral source and read it.

Battle of Longewala, should make, aptly clear, on how much difference, having air support, makes to battle on the ground.

I know about longewala. I specifically pointed out an exaggeration but whatever floats people boat...

 

[volatile]

When is the movie coming ?

 

[Globenim]

They are there to fight ISIS, based on UNSC resolution 2249.

The U.S. invasion and aid for terrorism is not based on the UNSC resolution 2249, dumbo. And everyone knows they aren't there "to fight ISIS" et all, you have to be really dumb to believe anyone in this age seriously believes that propaganda narrative. Selectively bombing a single group in certain places around oil fields, which U.S. backed terrorism has allowed to spread there in first place, only to occupy them by yourself while ignoring the same terrorist in any other place where attacking them could actually stabilize Syria and prevent terror acts, doesnt make the U.S. invasion compliant or even related to the UNSC resolution 2249. Arming and training terrorist to undermine and overthrow the Syrian government and occupying Syrian assets directly and via directly controlled illegal militant proxy groups and directly attacking the Syrian government forces to support terrorists, has nothing to do with the UNSC resolution at all either. UNSC resolution 2249 is not a free pass to occupy and create 5th columns and terrorists groups in Syria.

In fact the acts of the U.S. willfully directly and indirectly supporting terrorist groups and terrorist acts goes right against the UNSC resultion which demands to prevent and suppress any terrorist attacks in Syria, which the U.S. clearly doesnt give a shit about, in compliance with international law, which the U.S. clearly doesnt give a shit about either.

Obviously an anoying realty to lying terrorist sympathizers.

 

[A.P. Richelieu]

The U.S. invasion and aid for terrorism is not based on the UNSC resolution 2249, dumbo. And everyone knows they aren't there "to fight ISIS" et all, you have to be really dumb to believe anyone in this age seriously believes that propaganda narrative. Selectively bombing a single group which U.S. backed terrorism has willfully allowed to spread in first place only in certain places around oil fields important to the Syrians, only to occupy them while ignoring the terrorist in any other place where attacking them could actually stabilize Syria, doesnt make the U.S. invasion compliant or even related to the UNSC resolution 2249. Arming and training terrorist to undermine and overthrow the Syrian government and occupying Syrian assets directly and via directly controlled illegal militant proxy groups and directly attacking the Syrian government forces to support terrorists, has nothing to do with the UNSC resolution at all either.

In fact the acts of the U.S. willfully directly and indirectly supporting terrorist groups and terrorist acts goes right against the UNSC resultion which demands to prevent and suppress any terrorist attacks in Syria, which the U.S. clearly doesnt give a shit about, in compliance with international law, which the U.S. clearly doesnt give a shit about either.

Obviously an anoying realty to lying terrorist sympathizers.

The US has ”selectively” bombed ISIS out of Iraq.
You are ”selectively” reading news and apply illogical thinking.
Another ignore...

 

[Globenim]

Its not selective bombing under the pretense of fighting terror, when the U.S. only selectively bombs assets of certain terrorist groups they helped spread in Syria in first place around oil wells they want to occupy and fill with more proxy terrorists and militant U.S. loyal 5th columns and only when they are about to occupy them after ignoring them for years, while still ignoring them anywhere else in Syria where the terrorists help harm the Syrian government, because besides fueling the not so moderate terrorists with their moderate terrorist groups they established in Syria, the U.S. also has pushed terrorists they created themself in Iraq from Iraq towards Syria. And therefore the U.S. invasion and destabilization of Syria trough terrorism and direct attacks against the Syrian government, is somehow related to UNSC resolution 2249.

So much "logic".

 

[BATMAN]

500 armed with tanks howitzers couldn't harm 40 soldiers...
OK !

40 +Airsupport.

wow great US commandos, please send those to Afghanistan as well, why hiding them for last 16 or so years.
its a movie material, lets see which super power will make it first.

Which war is going on in Afghanistan?

^^ this is the biggest BS... what is defined in OP clearly shows what US can do to armed assailants.
US decimated Iraqi army in matter of few days.