What's new

'Homeland' upsets Israel

Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
383
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Now Homeland upsets Israel: Controversial scene in season finale prompts fury after former prime minister Menachem Begin is compared to fictional Taliban leader
  • Offending scene involves a former CIA director talking with a CIA agent
  • Agent refers to a highly controversial attack by right-wing Jewish group
  • He says Begin 'killed 91 British soldiers at the King David hotel' in 1946
  • Pakistani diplomats have also condemned the Emmy-winning series
  • Complained the show paints Islamabad as a 'hellhole' refuge for terrorists
  • Insisted Pakistan was an ally of U.S. and supports its fight against Taliban
By Annabel Grossman and Jennifer Smith for MailOnline

Published: 11:03 GMT, 29 December 2014 | Updated: 12:50 GMT, 29 December 2014

  • 154 shares

    222

    View comments


    Homeland has continued to ruffle feathers across the globe, after a scene in the season finale sparked outrage in Israel by comparing former prime minister Menachem Begin to a fictional Taliban leader.

    Just days after the Pakistani government hit out at the U.S. series over its portrayal of the country, Israelis have sharply criticized the television show and demanded an explanation for the comparison.

    The offending scene involved a conversation between CIA agent Dar Adal and former CIA director Saul Berenson, a Jewish character played by Mandy Patinkin.

    Scroll down for video

    2436B5D800000578-2888430-image-m-34_1419692279019.jpg


    +7
    Pakistani officials complained the show, starring Claire Danes (pictured above), depicted Islamabad as a hot-bed for terrorist activity

    The pair are discussing the possibility of protecting fictional Afghan Taliban leader, Haissam Haqqani, in order to ensure that he will not give political asylum to terrorists.

    Berenson describes Haqqani as a terrorist who 'recently killed 36 Americans'.

    Adal responds: 'Menachem Begin killed 91 British soldiers at the King David hotel before he became prime minister.'
    The Homeland CIA agent was referring to a bombing at the King David hotel in Jerusalem in 1946 that was carried out by the Irgun, a right-wing militant Jewish organization which was headed by Menachem Begin.

    Herzl Makov, head of the Menachem Begin Heritage Center in Jerusalem told Israeli news site Ynet, that the statement was: 'Slander against Menachem Begin and Israel'.


    Read more: Homeland season 4 finale upsets Israel | Daily Mail Online
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


    Read more: Homeland season 4 finale upsets Israel | Daily Mail Online
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
. .
He said: 'To say that Menachem Begin killed? He wasn't there. The underground organization was under his command and he took responsibility.

'Additionally, during the incident, three warnings were given to the British to evacuate the place. The British commander refused.'

BOMBING OF KING DAVID HOTEL
On July 22, 1946, the King David Hotel in Jerusalem was attacked by right-wing Jewish organization the Irgun.

A total of 91 people of various nationalities - including 28 Britons - were killed and 46 injured.

The hotel was the site of the central offices of the British Mandatory authorities of Palestine.

Bombing is regarded historically as a contributing factor to the British mandate’s decline.

The attack remains highly controversial, and there has been heated debate over when warnings were sent and how British authorities responded.

Menachem Begin began his political career as head of Irgun, where he was commander from 1943 to 1948.

He added: 'Therefore, there is a dramatic difference between the two incidents that were compared. As far as I'm concerned, it is just like saying that they are both terrorists because they wore brown shirts.'

The attack on the King David Hotel remains a highly controversial topic, as there has been heated debate over when warnings were sent and how British authorities responded.

Menachem Begin began his political career as head of Irgun, where he was commander from 1943 until the group disbanded in 1948.

He went on to become Israel’s sixth prime minister in 1977 and received the Nobel Peace Prize along with Egyptian president Anwar Sadat after an unprecedented peace treaty between the two countries in 1979.

The fresh Homeland controversy comes after the Pakistani government hit out at the television series over its portrayal of the country as a safe haven for Islamic terrorists.

Diplomats condemned producers for depicting Islamabad, the setting of the show's fourth series, as a 'hellhole' refuge for the Taliban


Read more: Homeland season 4 finale upsets Israel | Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

wow Israeli are copycats

lol
 
.
Islamabad... A hell-hole dipicted in Homeland.. The Reality:

97a085a1ccf5c2257b42748624931ad5.jpg





3 horrific inaccuracies in Homeland’s depiction of #Islamabad #Homeland

OCTOBER 30, 2014
tags: bigotry, FATIMA SHAKEEL, Homeland, inaccuracies, Islamabad





I’m at a little café in Islamabad, sipping a cappuccino. A young woman in a ponytail and jeans walks in and orders a dozen chocolate cupcakes; her two small children press their noses up to the glass of the dessert display case. We strike up a conversation, and she mentions that her family has just moved to Islamabad. “Great place to live, isn’t it?” she says.

I agree with her. I should know: I’m an Islamabad girl, born and raised, and there isn’t a city in the world I would rather call home. If anything, the city can be too quaint for some; residents of Pakistan’s larger metropolises sometimes poke fun at Islamabad for being too quiet or too small.

But you wouldn’t know any of that from the godforsaken hellscape depicted in the latest season of Showtime’s Emmy-winning drama Homeland. If the above scene from my real life had been “fictionalized” on the series, the view outside my window would have been a smog-ridden urban disaster. My cappuccino would have been a bitter black coffee from a dingy little shack. The friendly woman would have been a burka-clad hag shrieking at me in some awful, invented language to cover my sinful head. But of course, my uncovered head would just be a front, because I would turn out to be a villain, plotting the gruesome death-by-mob of some white guy.

For years, I’ve stayed on the fence about Homeland’s shameless bigotry, giving it the benefit of the doubt even when its depictions of Muslims have been less than nuanced. As the show begins its fourth season, however, I have been forced to re-evaluate my faith in both its intentions and its intelligence — starting with the horrendous teaser poster featuring a red-hooded Claire Danes as a lovely dash of color in a foreboding sea of black burkas.


As I watched the premiere episode, my anticipation over seeing my hometown as the setting of a critically acclaimed American television show quickly fizzled as I watched Carrie Mathison and her fellow CIA agents arrive in a wild, filthy, menacing land that looked nothing like the place I’ve lived in my entire life. The show’s clear lack of homework on Pakistan is astounding; the setting, the characters, and the language that Homeland tries to pass off as “local” are all foreign to me. It would be unreasonable to expect Homeland to get everything right, and I didn’t — after all, its “Islamabad” was actually filmed in Cape Town, South Africa.



But I still expected some semblance of effort from a show that positions itself as a serious drama grappling with U.S. foreign policy in the Muslim world. Since the show’s creators didn’t bother, allow me to offer some real-life context.

1. Islamabad is a beautiful, well-planned city — not a grimy netherworld.

In the season’s third episode, we see Carrie smoking in the open night air against a nondescript concrete cityscape. Ambassador Boyd (Laila Robins) comes out and scoffs, “Best view in Islamabad — which isn’t saying much.”

This isn’t just insulting from a character that Saul Berensen calls “one of the good ones” — it’s a mind-blowing distortion of fact. So hell-bent is Homeland on depicting Islamabad as a Third World “shit-hole” that it has somehow managed to make even Cape Town — one of the most beautiful cities in the world — look ugly, dirty, and characterless.

The real Islamabad sits at the foot of the densely forested Margalla Hills, which provide a scenic green backdrop that Islooites wake up to every day. Great, leafy boughs arch over the streets, blooming purple and crimson in the spring and bursting with autumnal hues in the fall. The neighborhoods boast manicured lawns and grassy parks with swing-sets and walking paths. Unlike the dusty “Agrabah“-style bazaars seen on Homeland, Islamabad has properly structured markets and modern shopping malls, as well as snazzy restaurants and quaint little ice-cream parlors, picturesque parks and hiking trails, and wide avenues lined with meticulously cultivated flower beds. It’s not the hopeless maze depicted in Homeland, either; the city is actually planned along a grid, divided into sectors with neatly arranged blocks and streets that you can easily find your way around. This is something the writers could have ascertained from a cursory glance at Google Earth.

As for the best view in Islamabad? Take your pick:


The Faisal Mosque



Rawal Lake



Spring in Islamabad



The Pakistan National Monument

2. Nobody speaks the bizarre, nonsensical language of the “local” characters on Homeland.

Imagine a show about New York City in which the “native New Yorkers” spoke English like the characters on Downton Abbey, spending wildly inaccurate amounts of money to go to nonexistent places. That’s what it feels like to watch Homeland if you speak Urdu.

Homeland consistently botches the most fundamental aspects of Urdu conversation, in ways that are both painful and hilarious to anyone who actually speaks it. If someone inquires about the whereabouts of their family members, and you have to tell them that they died in a drone strike, you don’t say “mujhe maaf kijiye,” as the strange, veiled woman in Homeland’s premiere does. Saying that does not mean “I’m sorry for your loss”; it means “forgive me,” implying that she personally murdered the inquirer’s family members.

The English accents are just as inauthentic. In real life, Pakistani English sounds nothing like the oft-caricatured Indian English accent. On Homeland, however, Pakistani characters speaking in English sound either like Apu from The Simpsons or like the carpet merchant singing the opening song of Disney’s Aladdin.

I find it hard to believe that the show’s producers couldn’t find a single native Urdu speaker or any Pakistani actors. At the very least, why not hire a language consultant? If Game of Thrones can hire a linguist to properly construct believable, fictional languages like Valyrian and Dothraki, why can’t Homeland hire somebody to check the basics of a real-world language?

3. Americans aren’t hated, and protests don’t instantly dissolve into bloodthirsty mobs.

The death of Sandy (Corey Stoll) at the hands of the mob was disturbing — and not just for the reasons Homeland intended. His attackers were less like a group of people than a zombie horde on The Walking Dead, breaking car windows and barbarically dragging him out while Peter Quinn (Rupert Friend) shoots them in their faces with videogame indifference.


It’s troubling not just because it appears to dehumanize this frothing Pakistani mob, but because the violence and rage shown are largely uncharacteristic of Pakistani people, particularly in Islamabad. Perhaps Homeland should have drawn inspiration from the tens of thousands of anti-government protesters who have been peacefully gathered outside the parliament building in Islamabad for the past two months, listening to speeches and singing along to live music. This is a community that gathers together every year in a candlelight vigil for the assassinated politician who died taking a stand for a Christian woman accused of blasphemy. And no protest would take place at the gates of the U.S. Embassy; the building is such a fortress, nestled deep within Islamabad’s diplomatic enclave, that I don’t think I’ve ever seen it.

It’s also ridiculous how unsafe Homeland makes Islamabad seem for Americans (or anyone who looks Caucasian), from the suspicious stares of those fake Isloo natives to the unspoken rule that Carrie must cover her head to go out in public. In reality, American and European visitors can often be seen around the streets of Islamabad — adults and children alike, by the way, so Carrie could easily have brought her poor daughter with her.

———————————————–

In Homeland’s most recent episode, the U.S. ambassador notes that she “can’t complain about bad relations with Pakistan while at the same time doing nothing to make them better.” The irony, of course, is that Homeland seems to be going out of its way to portray Pakistan in as unflattering a light as possible and to exaggerate anti-American sentiment in the country.

This is unfortunate because, while American foreign policy is certainly not popular among Pakistanis, people in urban Pakistan tend to be very fond of America’s other major global export: its pop culture. Entire generations have grown up watching Friends or The Simpsons. My grandparents listened to Elvis. Despite its flaws, my mother has actually been a fan of Homeland. Given the influence American entertainment holds in Pakistan, it’s unfortunate that Homeland should use its resources to willfully distort and darken the way our nations perceive each other.

And that’s why it’s important to call the show out on its offensive inaccuracies. The last thing the world needs is high-production-value hate mongering.
 
. . .
They all are in the same boat, from financing to actually recording it. What could you expect from them. If any body ever seen reluctant fundamentalist it was no different. Imagine what the university they shown as a Lahore university was nothing but a shit. The main door was covered with curtain made of jute, are you expecting good from them...no they will never give a positive picture of Pakistan while at the same time the dirtiest city on planet earth aka Mumbai would be portrayed as a most modern city.
 
.
They all are in the same boat, from financing to actually recording it. What could you expect from them. If any body ever seen reluctant fundamentalist it was no different. Imagine what the university they shown as a Lahore university was nothing but a shit. The main door was covered with curtain made of jute, are you expecting good from them...no they will never give a positive picture of Pakistan while at the same time the dirtiest city on planet earth aka Mumbai would be portrayed as a most modern city.

I was surprised to see the way Punab university was dipicted as... fukin idiots.
 
.
It is shameful that Hollywood for it's profits, brainwashing common American populace. The result will be illiterate future generations of America. The US govt must take action.
 
.
Why take any action? Freedom of Speech FTW! :D
 
.
Why should we care what some TV Show depicts Pakistan or Islamabad as? I mean why give a **** at all??
 
. .
Reality trumps image every damn time.
 
.
Comparing it to Oscar nominee Zero-Dark-Thirty it was a slight improvement
I think instead of focusing on Islamabad's depiction(i mean come on what are we expecting)...the story line was more damaging !
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom