Now consider this:
you have no connection with US, you dont live in US, your business , work , influence, in nutshell,your domain is outside US, infact, you have never set foot on US in your whole life. WHO CARES?
Comparing OBL with these lot is far fetched. Take this as a regional tussel between India-America axis on one side, and Pak-China strategic partnership on the other. Just yesterday PLA was knocking on the other side of Indian occupied Kashmir. That is the event of more significance then America giving a lip service to assuage its beleaguered ally.
You continue to miss my point. You don't have to live in the US to be affected by its [terrorist] designation - US is capable of making your life miserable in any part of the world, period.
My analogy is perfectly valid for an individual living in Pakistan; Nestle is a European company and have offices in Pakistan.
My point is that
his life is likely to change now (for the worse) since he has been designated a TERRORIST by a powerful country (outside India) unless he doesn't have a family and lives on charity. Even if he is living in a cave, he is now a fair target for not only Indian agencies but others.
If only India had declared him a terrorist, he could endure. However, US is in the picture now and it can go to any length to make the life of any terrorist miserable in any part of the world. Osama Bin Laden (and a large number of other Al-Qaeda operatives) had no investments in the US either and where are they now? DEAD.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-37658286
Pax Americana - the American unipolar moment - he notes, "was very short-lived and it is now over".
Listen to what your most intimate allies are saying to you. Dont listen to dirty Pakis.
I don't care about his opinion. I will concentrate on facts at hand.
Concession accepted.
Listen mate, Russia has barged its way into ME affair and America cant do a jackshit about it. Anyone who thinks that Russia is not rising is living in fools paradise. HELL, they hijacked your last elections according to your own state institutions and intel agencies. What else you need to know about their influence?
You are deliberately ignoring my points, aren't you?
Syrian regime formerly requested Russia to assist in its war against rebels but Russian intervention came into effect in Syria [after] assurances from Obama administration that it will not consider arming (and using) Syrian rebels against Russian forces much like in Afghanistan. Obama administration was not interested in toppling Syrian regime and resisting Russian intervention in Afghanistan, period. It started with this agreement in 2013:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/15/world/middleeast/syria-talks.html
NATO is operating in Syria in connection with its OPERATION INHERENT RESOLVE against ISIS:
http://www.inherentresolve.mil/About-Us/
In-fact, NATO and Russia have established a coordination center for operations in Syria:
https://www.gkovd.ru/en/joint-atm-system/russia-nato-coordination-centre/
If you were looking forward to a 'NATO versus Russia' scenario in Syria, you will be disappointed.
----
Now, what was I talking about?
[1] US has imposed economic sanctions on Russia in response to its intervention in
Ukraine:
https://www.state.gov/e/eb/tfs/spi/ukrainerussia/
[2] US have shattered the monopoly of OPEC via its
Shale Revolution in recent years, driving the prices of OIL down worldwide. OPEC member states are scrambling to stabilize the price of OIL and diversifying their economic activity - they don't have a choice.
Due to combination of [1] and [2], Russian economy has been tanking - dropped from 6th spot to 13th spot in a span of few years. And Russian economy will sink further because US has intensified its economic sanctions on Russia further [very recently].
And what was my original point again?
No country is immune to American pressures and punishing moves; Pax Americana is a reality.
Syria is irrelevant to this discussion (and my argument) because US is not opposed to Russian intervention in Syria in any way or form; only yellow journalism may suggest otherwise. If US actually wanted to oppose Russian intervention in Syria, it would have done so actively and results would have been visible to all by now.
US is
the superpower; Russia is not. Try to comprehend.
Pax Americana in the works.
Oh dear.
China is doing its best to prevent another war in Korean peninsula because China (and South Korea) face the prospect of a major humanitarian crises in the region. China already has a lot on its plate and a major war in the Korean peninsula is not a welcome development.
My point was that the US has moved the UN against North Korea with the intent to punish it further [in economic terms] for testing a number of missiles recently and even China had to nod its head in agreement.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...20da1aeb507_story.html?utm_term=.75229549bcbd
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/16/world/asia/china-north-korea-seafood-exports.html
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/08/06/china-and-us-pressure-north-korea-after-sanctions-vote
Pax Americana in the works.
Chinese have assumed the role of big boys, diffusing the tension among two parties. Its the America and NK who are bickering like kids, and China playing a peace maker role. This is what America has been reduced to.
See above.
Leon Panetta pointed out in one of his interviews that the real reason why US is not taking action against North Korea is due to the concern that millions of North Koreans might die in this war.
America has been trying for donkey years when Chavez was in power, what did it achieve? Zilch!
Did US invade Venezuela for that purpose? No.
US chose to penalize Venezuela in economic terms and this happened:
http://news.kuwaittimes.net/website/venezuelas-worst-economic-crisis-went-wrong/
In-fact, Trump regime was planning to penalize Venezuela even further but American Senate advised it not to out of concern of the well-being of Venezuelan public.
Pax Americana in the works.