Hitler Never Used Swastika: Evangelical Defamation Of Hindu Symbol

[LASER1]

Hitler Never Used Swastika: Evangelical Defamation Of Hindu Symbol

He had a weird interest in the South Asian religion including Buddhism, also towards Islam. They actually had SS comprising Bosnian Muslims, and he had good relationship with Amin al Husseini, the then grand mufti of Jerusalem, to a point that he actually made him Honorary Aryan, and gave him Hon. Major General Rank in SS.
Coming to your point, indeed the Evengelics tried to defame Hindus using this symbol, but I don't think it's through the way you explained, Hitler influenced by Gustaf kossein, a German linguist at the time who thought that, the Nordics were Master Aryans who brought vedas to Eurasian steppe, and the fool thought Aryans in Vedas are a race.

Hindu symbol? Hindu adopted this symbol. Originally it belongs to Indus Valley, ancient Pakistan.

No, in fact, the Swastika predates IVC. And the name Swastika itself is in Sanskrit, bit funny you say swastika was Pakistani origin.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Does Somalia have pyramids? Well, India has many sites that relate to the ancient civilization. Rakhigarhi, being the largest site in India.

Do you need pyramids everywhere in that part of world to be recognised as part of Nile civilization? What we refer to Israel and Syria, we're also part of Egyptian civilization, you don't see Israelis or Syrians claiming Nile civilization, it will be absurd and laughable to even suggest so. That is what you Indians have relation of ancient greater Pakistan aka IVC.

There wasn't an ancient civilization around Ganga river basin like the IVC. When it actually had, it became far more advanced in the region. Indus valley was primitive when compared to Vedic civilization which flourished in the Ganga basin. Meanwhile, the western regions went into decline because of constant invasion and no powerful Kingdoms ever ruled the region from what's today's Pakistan.

That's good if you believe so. So stop poking your nose in matters which does not concern you and tell your establishment and historians to find their glory in Ganges basin.

No, in fact, the Swastika predates IVC. And the name Swastika itself is in Sanskrit, bit funny you say swastika was Pakistani origin.

Indus predates your Hindu religion. IVC was 10 feet underground 1500 years before first trace of Vedas was found.

Guess where this is found.

It's predates your religion, your existence.

 

[LASER1]

Do you need pyramids everywhere in that part of world to be recognised as part of Nile civilization? What we refer to Israel and Syria, we're also part of Egyptian civilization, you don't see Israelis or Syrians claiming Nile civilization, it will be absurd and laughable to even suggest so. That is what you Indians have relation of ancient greater Pakistan aka IVC.

Yes man, you need Pyramids because they are unique to Egyptian civilization. And the name, Egyptian civilization was given because it was located in today's Egypt. Sudan too, to an extent. Did the Indus valley civilization called themselves Indus valley/Harappa? Hell no, it was a name given by Europeans because it was the first site. Also, Indus valley sites extended from today's Pakistan to India, you are claiming as if it's your exclusive civilization native to Pakistan. While a large chunk is in India.

That's good if you believe so. So stop poking your nose in matters which does not concern you and tell your establishment and historians to find their glory in Ganges basin.

We don't need to find which is already there. It's where great philosophical religion such as Buddhism, Jainism, and Hinduism flourished. And India is the land where four of the worlds major religion originated.

Indus predates your Hindu religion. IVC was 10 feet underground 1500 years before first trace of Vedas was found.

Guess where this is found.

It's predates your religion, your existence.

The origin of Hinduism is still unknown, nobody knows who wrote Vedas nor have any accurate prediction of the date of Rig Veda. As it was an oral tradition until some 500 BC or so. (Little rusty with that date). Guess how they predicted the age of Rig Veda? By comparing the mention of the horse in Rig Veda to the archeological evidence of the presence of horses in the subcontinent, which was found to be some 1600BC and assumptions based on some proto-Iranian languages (The ancestors of Iranian languages). It's like Sanskrit, nobody knows how old it is, but are based on written or archeological claims based on symbols on potteries where the margin of error is high.

Your claim is laughable, the oldest swastika symbol was found in Ukraine. It's 12000 years old. There are Swastikas found in many parts of the world.

Indus valley may or may not predate Vedas, that doesn't change the fact that, Vedic Civilization is the only continuous civilization more than 3000 years of old. And have managed to contribute a lot to science, mathematics, and medicine. Meanwhile, IVC is yet to be deciphered.

 

[Mamluk]

That would indicate the Hindu nature of the Mehrgarh civilization.

And Hindu nature of Nazi Aryanhood.

 

[KAMDEV]

And Hindu nature of Nazi Aryanhood.

Yes yes peace

 

[ThinkLogically]

Do you need pyramids everywhere in that part of world to be recognised as part of Nile civilization? What we refer to Israel and Syria, we're also part of Egyptian civilization, you don't see Israelis or Syrians claiming Nile civilization, it will be absurd and laughable to even suggest so. That is what you Indians have relation of ancient greater Pakistan aka IVC.



That's good if you believe so. So stop poking your nose in matters which does not concern you and tell your establishment and historians to find their glory in Ganges basin.



Indus predates your Hindu religion. IVC was 10 feet underground 1500 years before first trace of Vedas was found.

Guess where this is found.

View attachment 490280


It's predates your religion, your existence.

Hinduism is far beyond what you people can even think of. Don't even try.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Hinduism is far beyond what you people can even think of. Don't even try.

All I care that your faith came about 1500 years after my ancient greater Pakistan went 10 feet underground.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Yes man, you need Pyramids because they are unique to Egyptian civilization. And the name, Egyptian civilization was given because it was located in today's Egypt. Sudan too, to an extent. Did the Indus valley civilization called themselves Indus valley/Harappa? Hell no, it was a name given by Europeans because it was the first site. Also, Indus valley sites extended from today's Pakistan to India, you are claiming as if it's your exclusive civilization native to Pakistan. While a large chunk is in India.

LOL so you need pyramid at every spot of Egyptian civilization for those lands to be recognised as part of it?

Indeed, name doesn't matter, but archeology do. And that is archaeological fact that IVC originated around Indus river, infact the oldest Indus settlement discovered yet was on the western flanks of Indus in heart of Baluchistan. Which is very significant as it kills sanghis logic.

IVC does not "extend", it originated from Pakistan along the banks of Indus and it expanded both East and west, covering what is now western India, Iran and afghanistan on West and some parts of Turkmenistan. What you now consider your lands, were annexed as part of the greatest civilization of mankind. Just like Egypt and Babylon expanded from their respective river system.

The origin of Hinduism is still unknown, nobody knows who wrote Vedas nor have any accurate prediction of the date of Rig Veda. As it was an oral tradition until some 500 BC or so. (Little rusty with that date). Guess how they predicted the age of Rig Veda? By comparing the mention of the horse in Rig Veda to the archeological evidence of the presence of horses in the subcontinent, which was found to be some 1600BC and assumptions based on some proto-Iranian languages (The ancestors of Iranian languages). It's like Sanskrit, nobody knows how old it is, but are based on written or archeological claims based on symbols on potteries where the margin of error is high.

Your claim is laughable, the oldest swastika symbol was found in Ukraine. It's 12000 years old. There are Swastikas found in many parts of the world.

Indus valley may or may not predate Vedas, that doesn't change the fact that, Vedic Civilization is the only continuous civilization more than 3000 years of old. And have managed to contribute a lot to science, mathematics, and medicine. Meanwhile, IVC is yet to be deciphered.

Kiddo when your Vedas came after 1500 years of IVC, what does it say about swastika and it's Hindu origin. Go back to original argument, infact you yourself agreeing that swastika got nothing to do with Hinduism and it predates it. And this is EXACTLY what I was saying that Hinduism adopted it, didn't invented it .

Indus valley predates the Babylon and Egypt by some margin. Your vedic come nowhere close to its grandeur. The fact that those lands which you now call your country were civilized, ruled by it mellinia after mellinia uninterrupted, says a lot!

 

[LASER1]

Indeed, name doesn't matter, but archeology do. And that is archaeological fact that IVC originated around Indus river, infact the oldest Indus settlement discovered yet was on the western flanks of Indus in heart of Baluchistan. Which is very significant as it kills sanghis logic.

You missed a few news in between. The Bhirrana in Haryana is now the oldest site, dating back to 7000BC. And Rakhigarhi is the largest city of Harappan.

Kiddo when your Vedas came after 1500 years of IVC, what does it say about swastika and it's Hindu origin. Go back to original argument, infact you yourself agreeing that swastika got nothing to do with Hinduism and it predates it. And this is EXACTLY what I was saying that Hinduism adopted it, didn't invented it .

Boy, you have no idea. Well, I wouldn't expect a muslim to know any better. Where did I say swastika has Hindu origin dummy? I said the term swastika is of Hindu origin. Also, the fact that, the origins of Vedas is vague. Based on assumptions, given there was no formal writing at the time and it was invented only during 500BC, how can you be sure first Veda is from 1500BC?

 

[El Sidd]

Bangladesh like Israel want a Holocaust Museum in Japan.

I was threatened with Life when i said both Israel and Bangladesh are cut from the same cloth

 

[Sugarcane]

Hitler was nice man, He has been made villain because history is written by victors. May he rest in peace.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

You missed a few news in between. The Bhirrana in Haryana is now the oldest site, dating back to 7000BC. And Rakhigarhi is the largest city of Harappan.

LOL what a turd. go educate yourself. Its Mehrgarh in the heart of Baluchistan which is considered to the from early Indus period.

Boy, you have no idea. Well, I wouldn't expect a muslim to know any better. Where did I say swastika has Hindu origin dummy? I said the term swastika is of Hindu origin. Also, the fact that, the origins of Vedas is vague. Based on assumptions, given there was no formal writing at the time and it was invented only during 500BC, how can you be sure first Veda is from 1500BC?

Turd, my original argument was with one of your kind and how Hinduism adapted Swastika, it didn't invented it, before you jumped into trying to be smarty pants. LOL

 

[AUz]

Nobody cares for your long wall of text

Swastikha remains a hated and disgusting symbol globally and people spit on it. Nobody gives a sh!t about a backwards religion practiced in the largest sh!thole of the world called india.

 

[Rusty]

More evidence that Nazis and hindutva share the same ideology

 

[LASER1]

LOL what a turd. go educate yourself. Its Mehrgarh in the heart of Baluchistan which is considered to the from early Indus period.

Lol! Were you hibernating? That got debunked recently.
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...hi-Asias-largest-ASI/articleshow/46926693.cms

Yeah, take your next best escape... #fakenews

Turd, my original argument was with one of your kind and how Hinduism adapted Swastika, it didn't invented it, before you jumped into trying to be smarty pants. LOL

Again, how can you say we adopted swastika from IVC, given it was used by Eurasian steppe people or the so-called Aryans. But I wouldn't expect a dummy to understand that.