Grand Historian
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Messages
- 668
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
The more interact with the you the more I'm convinced you haven't read my sources.What is an anachronism is not secret terminology in English, bro. (Noun, something or someone that is not in its correct historical or chronological time, esp. a thing or person that belongs to an earlier time. .., object, event, etc., is assigned a date or period other than the correct one)
I copy here for you, again what I believed that this is correct: "people of Han" (漢人) is existed from time of Han Dynasty.
" As a result of the Han Dynasty's prominence, in inter-ethnic and inter-(premodern)-national matters, many Chinese began identifying themselves as "people of Han" (漢人), a name that has since been carried down"
Han Chinese - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In the time of Northern Wei 北魏, (386–535) , Han people is still claimed themselves as "people of Han" (漢人) , discriminated majority people "are civilized" from minority people from Nomad tribes rulers considered "are barbarian" by Chinese scholars.
It doesn't matter what your believe in,Wikipedia as a source is laughable
漢 was never used an ethonym during the Han dynasty it was a nationality,ie Chinese applies to all ethnic minorities and the majority in the PRC but Han only applies to the Han.
You can lie all you want repeating the same debunked information is ludicrous.
Han didn't call themselves 漢 the Xianbei did,otherwise they were used to using 趙,晉 or 華.
While the Xianbei used 華,so no it doesn't make sense for the Xianbei to insult their own culture by labeling the majority of their subjects as 漢.
Again you fail to understand anachronism you can't equate two separate ethnoyms,the Shang are different from the Zhou,the Zhou different from the Qin,the Qin different from the Han etc,no culture or ethnicity is static.Its stranger when you did not understood my idea. Hanzu 漢 族 and Huaxia zu people 華夏族 are shared same bloodline and ethnic group.
You are Han, your descendant is ruled by Vietnamese, your descendant is Hua ren or Tang ren, or Minh Huong. Your descendanr does not shared bloodline with Vietnamese/Kinh people, so can not considered as Viet/king in ethnicity. He could have Vietnamese citizenship only.
Its the same reason why Confucius or Qin Shihuang can't be Han,why Xiongnu are neither Turks or Mongols,why Dong Son are not Kinh etc.
So what if they're non-Han?北魏 (386-534) annihilated the empire of 北涼 (398-439) in the far west. Except four states ( 西涼, 北燕, 前涼 and the 魏冉), all other empires, kingdoms and polities in the north were founded by Non-Chinese 漢 persons.
They came from the "five barbarian" peoples (wuhu 五胡) of the Xianbei 鮮卑, Jie 羯, Qiang 羌, Di 氐 and Xiongnu 匈奴 (including the Lushui 盧水 and Tiefu 鐵弗 tribes). They don't speak Mandarin Sino-Tibetan language. They are minority people of China.
Vietnamese had multiple rulers that had ancestors from Chinese polities,does that invalidate the dynasty?
The Di and the Qiang were Tibeto Burman speakers.
The nomads never labeled themselves 漢 however some did call themselves 華.
Nobody is claiming that the Xianbei viewed themselves as Han or call themselves Han.Xianbei people 鮮卑 is Nomad people, they speak Turk language, this people could not been Hanzu in ethnicity. The State was not considered as righteous Han dynasty though that they labelled themselves as 漢.
The questions is whether the Xianbei viewed themselves as Chinese,however that's another argument.
The Mandate of Heaven doesn't just apply to Han/Hua, they were as legitimate as the Southern dynasties.