History of Pakistan from 3000 BC to the present

[Srinivas]

Pakistan from 3000 BC to the present:

1. Indus Valley Civilization: 3000-1500 B.C. i.e. about 1500 yrs. Independent, separate from India.

2. Aryan period: 1500-522 B.C. i.e. about 978 yrs. Independent, separate from India.

3. Small semi-independent states: 522-326 B.C. i.e. about 196 yrs. Under the suzerainty of Iran's Kayani (Achaemenian) Empire.

4. Conquered by Alexander and remained under his successor: 326-300 B.C. i.e. about 26 yrs. Under Greek rulers, not part of India.

5. Province of Mauryan Empire which included Afghanistan: 300-200 B.C. i.e. about 100 yrs. Part of India, mostly Buddhist rule.

6. Graeco-Bactrian period: 200-100 B.C. i.e. about 100 yrs. Independent, not part of India.

7. Saka-Parthian period: 100 B.C.- 70 A.D. i.e. about 170 yrs. Independent, separate from India.

8. Kushan rule (1st phase): 70-250 A.D. i.e. about 180 yrs. Pakistan-based kingdom ruled over major portion of north India.

9. Kushan rule (2nd phase): 250-450 A.D. i.e. about 200 yrs. Independent, separate from India.

10. White Huns and allied tribes (1st phase): 450-650 A.D. i.e. about 200 yrs. Pakistan-based kingdoms ruled over parts of north India.

11. White Huns (2nd phase--- mixed with other races): 650-1010 A.D. i.e. about 360 yrs. Independent Rajput-Brahmin Kingdoms, not part of India.

12. Ghaznavids: 1010-1187 A.D. i.e. 177 yrs. Part of Ghaznavid empire, separate from India.

13. Ghorid and Qubacha periods: 1187-1227 A.D. i.e. about 40 yrs. Independent, not part of India.

14. Muslim period (Slave dynasty, Khiljis, Tughlaqs, Syeds, Lodhis, Suris and Mughals): 1227-1739 A.D. i.e. about 512 yrs. Under north India based MUSLIM govts.

15. Nadir Shah and Abdali periods: 1739-1800 A.D. i.e. about 61 yrs. Iranian and Afghan suzerainty, not part of India.

16. Sikh rule (in Punjab, NWFP and Kashmir), Talpur rule in Sind, Khanate of Kalat in Baluchistan: 1800-1848 A.D. i.e. about 48 yrs. Independent states, not part of India.

17. British rule: 1848-1947 A.D. i.e. about 99 yrs (1843-1947 in Sind). Part of India under FOREIGN rule.

18. Muslim rule under the nomenclature of Pakistan: 1947-present. Independent, not part of India.


The above table reveals that during the 5000 years of Pakistan's known history, this country was part of India for a total period of 711 yrs of which 512 yrs were covered by the MUSLIM period and about 100 years each by the Mauryan (mostly BUDDHIST) and British (CHRISTIAN) periods. Can anybody agree with the Indian 'claim' that Pakistan was part of India and that partition was unnatural? It hardly needs much intelligence to understand that Pakistan always had her back towards India and face towards the countries on her west. This is true both commercially and culturally.

History of India and Pakistan are mingled with each other. You are mentioning separate from India to distance Pakistan from Indian subcontinent, The same way your rulers did. May be Balochistan and some regions from the FATA and KP may have been different but the regions Punjab and Sindh are part of the rulers who ruled the sub continent.

 

[dott]

We are neither Arabs, Persians, Turks, or bharatis. We are Pakistanis, but we have no problems with Arabs, Persian or Turks. Unlike bharatis, they are not obsessed about us and they don't try to persuade us that we are same.

mr omar we r not the same but unfortunately ur forefathers were one of us. and went on the other side of the border and became pakistanis and now claim that ivc was a pakistani civilisation. this is phucking launchable

 

[Omar1984]

Pakistan's ancient civilization has existed for thousands of years. india only came on the map in 1947. Before 1947 there was no such thing as india.

You are right. india came a day after Pakistan in August 15, 1947. Just because these cunning bharatis kept the foreign created word invaders gave to us, they think they have the right to our land's history. British India was dead in August 14, 1947.

mr omar we r not the same but unfortunately ur forefathers were one of us. and went on the other side of the border and became pakistanis and now claim that ivc was a pakistani civilisation. this is phucking launchable

Only 8% of Pakistan's population today have forefathers who came from your side of the border and they themselves don't want to be associated with you. Other than Khalistanis, you bharatis are as foreign to us as Africans are foreign to us.

 

[Ignited Mind]

You are right. india came a day after Pakistan in August 15, 1947. Just because these cunning bharatis kept the foreign created word invaders gave to us, they think they have the right to our land's history. British India was dead in August 14, 1947.

India joined UN on 30 October 1945

India and the United Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

India was one of the participating nations of 1900 Summer Olympics.

1900 Summer Olympics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Looks like we have another fan of Zaid Hamid and his theory of Ghosts here!

 

[Omar1984]

History of India and Pakistan are mingled with each other. You are mentioning separate from India to distance Pakistan from Indian subcontinent, The same way your rulers did. May be Balochistan and some regions from the FATA and KP may have been different but the regions Punjab and Sindh are part of the rulers who ruled the sub continent.

Only Khalistan (Indian Punjab) shares the same history as Pakistan Punjab and Sindh. The rest of india can go join Africa.

 

[dott]

You are right. india came a day after Pakistan in August 15, 1947. Just because these cunning bharatis kept the foreign created word invaders gave to us, they think they have the right to our land's history. British India was dead in August 14, 1947.



Only 8% of Pakistan's population today have forefathers who came from your side of the border and they themselves don't want to be associated with you. Other than Khalistanis, you bharatis are as foreign to us as Africans are foreign to us.

so u want to say that pakistan has a long history from 3000 bc and indian history starts from 15 aug 1947. kk got u broo. r u getting seizures these days or ur brain is always phucked up.

 

[Omar1984]

India joined UN on 30 October 1945

India and the United Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

India was one of the participating nations of 1900 Summer Olympics.

1900 Summer Olympics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Looks like we have another fan of Zaid Hamid and his theory of Ghosts here!

Thats British India. Today's India is not British India. You should have created a word for your own country instead of keeping the name invaders gave to you. British India was dead in August 14, 1947. Two new nations were created then, Pakistan and bharat.

 

[neutral_person]

We are neither Arabs, Persians, Turks, or bharatis. We are Pakistanis, but we have no problems with Arabs, Persian or Turks. Unlike bharatis, they are not obsessed about us and they don't try to persuade us that we are same.

Read what I said again:

All Pakistanis with Hindu and Sikh ancestry (like myself) are living in India now. Last time I checked, Pakistan has like 1% Hindus left, soon to be extinct probably. In 1947, close to 30% of Pakistan was non-Muslim, made up of Hindus and Sikhs who migrated to India. So yes, IVC not only culturally and religiously India's, but by ancestry as well.

I am not trying to persuade you that we are the same, we (the successors of Indus civlization) and Pakistanis are worlds apart. Show me one post where I said that Pakistanis worship idols and speak Sanskrit like the Indus Valley Civilization people did, or how the current people of India still do.

 

[dott]

Only Khalistan (Indian Punjab) shares the same history as Pakistan Punjab and Sindh. The rest of india can go join Africa.

there is no khalistan. sorry

 

[Omar1984]

Read what I said again:

All Pakistanis with Hindu and Sikh ancestry (like myself) are living in India now. Last time I checked, Pakistan has like 1% Hindus left, soon to be extinct probably. In 1947, close to 30% of Pakistan was non-Muslim, made up of Hindus and Sikhs who migrated to India. So yes, IVC not only culturally and religiously India's, but by ancestry as well.

I am not trying to persuade you that we are the same, we (the successors of Indus civlization) and Pakistanis are worlds apart. Show me one post where I said that Pakistanis worship idols and speak Sanskrit like the Indus Valley Civilization people did, or how the current people of India still do.

The people of IVC did not go around calling themselves Hindus and they did not practice Hinduism so all you say is B.S.

 

[dott]

Thats British India. Today's India is not British India. You should have created a word for your own country instead of keeping the name invaders gave to you. British India was dead in August 14, 1947. Two new nations were created then, Pakistan and bharat.

ohh then what was the empire created by mauryans and guptas?? since ur soo awsome in history i should take some classes.

 

[Ignited Mind]

Thats British India. Today's India is not British India. You should have created a word for your own country instead of keeping the name invaders gave to you. British India was dead in August 14, 1947. Two new nations were created then, Pakistan and bharat.

lol Next you'll say Russia was born in 1991.



Man! Pakistanis and their 'logic'.

 

[neutral_person]

The people of IVC did not go around calling themselves Hindus and they did not practice Hinduism so all you say is B.S.

Man is that what the history books in Pakistan say




The religion of Hinduism probably has its roots in the Indus Valley civilisation. Hindus and Indus people both worship a 'mother goddess' (her names include Parvati and Sakti), and both regard the cow as sacred. Hindus and Indus people both bathe in the River for religious purposes and consider rivers holy.[59]

Some Indus valley seals show swastikas, which are found in other religions (worldwide), especially in Indian religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. The earliest evidence for elements of Hinduism are alleged to have been present before and during the early Harappan period.[60] Phallic symbols interpreted as the much later Hindu Shiva lingam have been found in the Harappan remains.[61][62]

Many Indus valley seals show animals. One motif shows a horned figure seated in a posture reminiscent of the Lotus position and surrounded by animals was named by early excavators Pashupati (lord of cattle), an epithet of the later Hindu gods Shiva and Rudra.[63][64][65]

In view of the large number of figurines found in the Indus valley, some scholars believe that the Harappan people worshipped a Mother goddess symbolizing fertility, a common practice among rural Hindus even today.[66] However, this view has been disputed by S. Clark who sees it as an inadequate explanation of the function and construction of many of the figurines.[67]



Man, I can already guess what the next thread is going to be on PDF:

"Ashoka Khan, the great Islamic Pakistani king who spreads Islam to Meccah and Madinah"

 

[dott]

lol Next you'll say Russia was born in 1991.



Man! Pakistanis and their 'logic'.

loll russia was born in 1991 and china in 1949 lolll crazy pplllll

The people of IVC did not go around calling themselves Hindus and they did not practice Hinduism so all you say is B.S.

putt mere jaa ke history pad. smaj aa jayegi. (not the zaid hamid history though)

 

[Ignited Mind]

loll russia was born in 1991 and china in 1949 lolll crazy pplllll

Pakistanis!