Historic surrender of the Indian Muslims

[Kabira]

Couldnt care less. They chose hindu secularism and they must pay the price.

 

[MM_Haider]

Indian Muslims are reaping what they sowed.. even after this surrender they won't be considered loyal Indian citizens and Amit Shahs will keep on denying their citizenship

 

[Jugger]

Indian Muslims are reaping what they sowed.. even after this surrender they won't be considered loyal Indian citizens and Amit Shahs will keep on denying their citizenship

Indian Muslims are full citizens with full rights, they can also become the prime minister of India or take any other high office, unlike Pakistan that restricts non Muslims from high posts. Clear display of religious racism.
But this does not mean we take in people from other countries and make them Indian citizens.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

the Muslims are doing this since they know that the dispute in the Supreme Court and the judgement will come out next month. They are afraid that if they get the entire land by any chance, Hindus might get very agitated, so they are trying to portray that they respect the sentiments of Hindus by saying such things.

They are preparing for such a situation if they win the case.

The matter is in court and the judgement will be out next month. There is no need to make such statements now.

 

[jamahir]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1182345908987416576

I have been saying the same thing ( as this committee ) for many months on PDF. The Muslims of India should enable an atmosphere of goodwill by handing over the disputed site ( Babri Masjid ) to the Hindu groups vying for the site.

The Babri Mosque is not the holiest place for Muslims. Nor is it the oldest mosque in India ( in Kerala state, built in 629 AD ).

Apart from Babri there are two disputed mosque sites where it is claimed that they were built on Hindu temples. These two should be handed over.

However, all this handing over should be limited to these three. Claims like the Taj Mahal being a temple called Tejo Mahalaya should be considered by the Supreme Court as frivolous.

so they are trying to portray that they respect the sentiments of Hindus by saying such things.

What is wrong in wanting peace ??

But this does not mean we take in people from other countries and make them Indian citizens.

Is that a stealth statement against Sonia Gandhi and about the NRC issue ??

Ayodha dispute should be settled with a quid-pro-quo. One temple for may be 20 new mega mosques as a starter

In True Islam, a mosque is not the most important of ideas, unlike in Conservative Hinduism where a temple is considered a place where a god or goddess is actually present.

On my personal experience ..Indian muslims argue that Quaid shouldn't create the Pakistan..... I just laugh and walk away..........

You argue FOR the Two Nation Theory. But let me point out that the TNT was originally an idea of the Hindu Mahasabha and it was adopted by Jinnah after he saw that he in no way would get to become the PM of Unified India after Independence.

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

I have been saying the same thing ( as this committee ) for many months on PDF. The Muslims of India should enable an atmosphere of goodwill by handing over the disputed site ( Babri Masjid ) to the Hindu groups vying for the site.

The Babri Mosque is not the holiest place for Muslims. Nor is it the oldest mosque in India ( in Kerala state, built in 629 AD ).

Apart from Babri there are two disputed mosque sites where it is claimed that they were built on Hindu temples. These two should be handed over.

However, all this handing over should be limited to these three. Claims like the Taj Mahal being a temple called Tejo Mahalaya should be considered by the Supreme Court as frivolous.



What is wrong in wanting peace ??



Is that a stealth statement against Sonia Gandhi and about the NRC issue ??



In True Islam, a mosque is not the most important of ideas, unlike in Conservative Hinduism where a temple is considered a place where a god or goddess is actually present.

Wanting peace should not come at the cos tof justice and violation of rule of law. This gesture should be well received but the law should be allowed to take its own course in a civilised country. Whatever the Supreme Court says must happen. If any compromises had to be made, that should have happened at the mediation stage, which failed.

 

[PakSword]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1182345908987416576

Wait for a few more years, they will start giving their daughters, sisters, wives and mothers in goodwill gestures.

 

[jamahir]

Wait for a few more years, they will start giving their daughters, sisters, wives and mothers in goodwill gestures.

Your post suggests that women ( daughters and sisters ) are commodities that can be given by men to others for some purpose. Is that how it is in Islam ??

If any compromises had to be made, that should have happened at the mediation stage, which failed.

I suppose this group, Indian Muslims for Peace, had not got the idea earlier.

 

[PakSword]

Your post suggests that women ( daughters and sisters ) are commodities that can be given by men to others for some purpose. Is that how it is in Islam ??

Talking about them Muslims living in India.

And my answer to your question will depend on whether you believe Quran is Allah's book.

 

[jamahir]

Talking about them Muslims living in India.

Tunisia, a Muslim-majority country in Africa, had a law passed in 2017 that allowed Muslim women to marry non-Muslims.

We the people of South Asia need to let this possibility become part of our practices.

 

[Jackdaws]

I have been saying the same thing ( as this committee ) for many months on PDF. The Muslims of India should enable an atmosphere of goodwill by handing over the disputed site ( Babri Masjid ) to the Hindu groups vying for the site.

The Babri Mosque is not the holiest place for Muslims. Nor is it the oldest mosque in India ( in Kerala state, built in 629 AD ).

Apart from Babri there are two disputed mosque sites where it is claimed that they were built on Hindu temples. These two should be handed over.

However, all this handing over should be limited to these three. Claims like the Taj Mahal being a temple called Tejo Mahalaya should be considered by the Supreme Court as frivolous.



What is wrong in wanting peace ??



Is that a stealth statement against Sonia Gandhi and about the NRC issue ??



In True Islam, a mosque is not the most important of ideas, unlike in Conservative Hinduism where a temple is considered a place where a god or goddess is actually present.



You argue FOR the Two Nation Theory. But let me point out that the TNT was originally an idea of the Hindu Mahasabha and it was adopted by Jinnah after he saw that he in no way would get to become the PM of Unified India after Independence.

Tejo Mahalya theory has been thrown out by Supreme Court. That moron even wrote that Vatican City was Vatika Nagar or some such rubbish.

 

[PakSword]

Tunisia, a Muslim-majority country in Africa, had a law passed in 2017 that allowed Muslim women to marry non-Muslims.

We the people of South Asia need to let this possibility become part of our practices.

Who cares what Tunisia or Lunaticia has done? Similarly, who cares if Muslims of India decide to marry off their daughters to Hindus? Or even put Kali Mata and Ganesha in their mosques on the imam's pulpit as a goodwill gesture. Maybe that will save them from lynchings and raise them above dalits.

I see all of this as a race between Dalits and Muslims to get approval in Indian society, which Muslims will surely win.

 

[Sabretooth]

They might as well put their bottoms on the frying pan but it still won't be enough to please them.
For Muslims, they are not Muslim enough. For Hindus, they are not Hindu enough. So what are they?

 

[masterchief_mirza]

I have been saying the same thing ( as this committee ) for many months on PDF. The Muslims of India should enable an atmosphere of goodwill by handing over the disputed site ( Babri Masjid ) to the Hindu groups vying for the site.

The Babri Mosque is not the holiest place for Muslims. Nor is it the oldest mosque in India ( in Kerala state, built in 629 AD ).

Apart from Babri there are two disputed mosque sites where it is claimed that they were built on Hindu temples. These two should be handed over.

However, all this handing over should be limited to these three. Claims like the Taj Mahal being a temple called Tejo Mahalaya should be considered by the Supreme Court as frivolous.



What is wrong in wanting peace ??



Is that a stealth statement against Sonia Gandhi and about the NRC issue ??



In True Islam, a mosque is not the most important of ideas, unlike in Conservative Hinduism where a temple is considered a place where a god or goddess is actually present.



You argue FOR the Two Nation Theory. But let me point out that the TNT was originally an idea of the Hindu Mahasabha and it was adopted by Jinnah after he saw that he in no way would get to become the PM of Unified India after Independence.

Do you think that's why jinnah wanted the TNT? Wow. The Koolaid is strong in hinduville.

Indian Muslims are full citizens with full rights, they can also become the prime minister of India or take any other high office, unlike Pakistan that restricts non Muslims from high posts. Clear display of religious racism.
But this does not mean we take in people from other countries and make them Indian citizens.

Pakistan is a safe haven for Muslims and those of all faiths or none. Having a Hindutva in charge would by definition negate the ability of Pakistan to ensure safety for Muslims. This is based on the ample evidence provided by our dear neighbour to the east that whenever Hindutva is in charge, Muslims suffer.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1182345908987416576

Why don't hindus show this good will gesture?