'Historic' EU-Mid East-India trade plan launched - EU-Mideast-India trade plan launched at G20 summit

[Puffin]

Looks costly. loading and unloading goods will take too much time. So 40% time cut is fake propaganda. This route will take more time than sea freight.

unfortunately NOT TRUE. It takes nearly a month to cross through the Suez . It takes 12 days with new route. False propaganda is people who know nothing about ACTUAL transit times

 

[Cash GK]

It is just a bluf read my article on this. They already control the world waters. Nothing new in this plan it is just sketch under usa leadership

Evaluating the Viability of the G20 Alternative to the Belt and Road Initiative

Introduction: The recently unveiled alternative to China's ambitious Belt and Road initiative by the United States, India, Saudi Arabia, and the European Union at the G20 summit has sparked both intrigue and skepticism. While the proposal aims to provide an alternative framework for...

defence.pk

 

[Puffin]

It is just a bluf read my article on this. They already control the world waters. Nothing new in this plan it is just sketch under usa leadership

Evaluating the Viability of the G20 Alternative to the Belt and Road Initiative

Introduction: The recently unveiled alternative to China's ambitious Belt and Road initiative by the United States, India, Saudi Arabia, and the European Union at the G20 summit has sparked both intrigue and skepticism. While the proposal aims to provide an alternative framework for...

defence.pk

Quoting your own ramblings is sad joke

 

[Cash GK]

Quoting your own ramblings is sad joke

Tell you the truth. Happy man. I can see the pain since I have pointed this out very first day

 

[FuturePAF]

Rail transportation is fast but shipment volume is limited. Sea transportation is slow but shipment volume is huge. When the two combined, buckets effect happens. It's slow and low volume.

Chinese projects are either pure sea transportation or pure rail transportation.

If rail infrastructure use is to be maximized to increase speed, It only makes sense the sea journey is kept to a minimum. To counter this plan, linking Gwadar and the UAE and then building out the Iraqi and Syrian rail networks to link up with Turkey and Europe will bypass Iran.

China is already helping to rebuild Iraqi rail infrastructure and building a rail line in the balkans.

The real issue here is not Indian trade to Europe, but specifically the potential of ASEAN trade to Europe once Myanmar allows trains between ASEAN countries and India. If China can convince the Myanmar government to block a rail route to India, and at the same time build a rail route across Tibet and down into Pakistan, China will have linked Gwadar with ASEAN by rail, giving China control of the only rail route between ASEAN and the World, and India’s corridor to a Asia will be just Indian trade to Europe, which would undermine Indian plans, in that regard, for greater economic heft in global affairs.

Building out the Lhasa to Heitan railway along side the Karakoram railway between Xinjiang and Pakistan (especially so the cargo is not held up by disputes between Pakistan and Afghanistan, on a trans-afghan railway) should now be seen as a strategic need to counter this Indian corridor.

Qinghai Tibet Railway Map - Find Your Most Suitable Train Journey to Tibet

Maps of Qinghai Tibet Railway, Gives the most authoritative overall review of 7 major railway lines from China to Tibet.

www.tibettravel.org

China 'Green Lights' A Whopping ¥ 400 Billion BRI Project To Pakistan; Aims To Connect Kashgar To Gwadar Via Kashmir

Chinese President Xi Jinping has green signaled the largest Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) transport project of the railway line between Kashgar in East Turkestan (Xinjiang) to the Pakistani port of Gwadar on the Arabian Sea. China has taken the initiative knowing the strategic importance and...

www.eurasiantimes.com

 

[indushek]

If rail infrastructure use is to be maximized to increase speed, It only makes sense the sea journey is kept to a minimum. To counter this plan, linking Gwadar and the UAE and then building out the Iraqi and Syrian rail networks to link up with Turkey and Europe will bypass Iran.

China is already helping to rebuild Iraqi rail infrastructure and building a rail line in the balkans.

The real issue here is not Indian trade to Europe, but specifically the potential of ASEAN trade to Europe once Myanmar allows trains between ASEAN countries and India. If China can convince the Myanmar government to block a rail route to India, and at the same time build a rail route across Tibet and down into Pakistan, China will have linked Gwadar with ASEAN by rail, giving China control of the only rail route between ASEAN and the World, and India’s corridor to a Asia will be just Indian trade to Europe, which would undermine Indian plans, in that regard, for greater economic heft in global affairs.

Well the work has already begun, don't think Myanmar will block us that easily.

India steps up rail connectivity with Myanmar in outreach to ASEAN

After the inauguration of the much-awaited Sittwe Port in Myanmar, the Indian Railways has now announced linking the neighbouring country with Mizoram. It has approved the final location survey of a 223 km rail line from Aizawl to Hbichhuah in Mizoram, near the Myanmar border. Sources said that...

www.indianarrative.com

 

[_NOBODY_]

There are 4 threads on the same topic. Kindly stop creating separate threads for this topic. @waz And mods, can you kindly merge all the threads that are about this topic.

 

[Silicon0000]

The main part of this route is linking Israel-Jordan-Saudi Arabia-UAE ......... Rest is only top-ups.